1up

Name: 1up
Brand: 1up
Rating: 4.9 (36 reviews)

AI Native

Answer sales questions, RFPs, and security questionnaires 10x faster with 1up. ⚡👾⚡

Est 2021|Valuation $22M|Raised $8.6M|15 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 14K|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 35|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsAI Sales Engineers RFP Response Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where 1up may provide advantages: published starting price, self-service trial, relatively quick setup, and a focus on extracting recent information from connected sources rather than maintaining a static library.
Where incumbents may have advantages: Loopio and Responsive typically offer more mature enterprise workflows, such as structured libraries, review/approval processes, analytics, and detailed permissioning.
From competitor commentary: competitor materials position this vendor as an AI-focused, lightweight alternative that drafts answers by pulling from existing knowledge sources in near real time, which can reduce content curation overhead in some environments.

- Where 1up may provide advantages: published starting price, self-service trial, relatively quick setup, and a focus on extracting recent information from connected sources rather than maintaining a static library. - Where incumbents may have advantages: Loopio and Responsive typically offer more mature enterprise workflows, such as structured libraries, review/approval processes, analytics, and detailed permissioning. - From competitor commentary: competitor materials position this vendor as an AI-focused, lightweight alternative that drafts answers by pulling from existing knowledge sources in near real time, which can reduce content curation overhead in some environments.

Adoption trends / market signals

Press coverage and vendor materials indicate early-stage growth and a growing customer base, but the vendor remains earlier-stage relative to legacy RFP incumbents.

	1up	Loopio	Responsive
Starting Price	Free tier available; paid tiers starting in the lower-hundreds-per-month when billed annually	Starts at enterprise-priced levels	Pricing is typically quote-based and not publicly listed
Recommended for	Lean teams seeking AI-assisted drafting from connected sources and relatively quick setup	Established proposal teams needing structured response management and enterprise workflows	Organizations seeking a broad response platform with extensive process coverage
Key Strength	Lower upfront cost, published pricing, and a self-service trial with chat and browser extension workflow surfaces	Mature platform with enterprise onboarding and a structured content library model	Broad feature set across the response lifecycle and integrations
Key Weakness	Answer quality depends on source governance; some enterprise controls are not clearly documented publicly	Higher cost and heavier deployment; less self-service oriented	Complexity and opacity in pricing; content-library maintenance requirements