| Aspect | 8Layers | Silverfort | Push Security |
|--------|---------|------------|--------------|
| Starting Price | Not publicly listed (demo/quote-based) | Not clearly published on vendor site; third-party procurement documents vary by channel | Public pricing information is limited; typically quote/demo-oriented |
| Best For | European organisations seeking combined identity posture, identity threat investigation/response, and identity compliance evidence in a consolidated platform | Organisations needing enforcement controls across legacy and cloud authentication flows | SaaS-centric identity attack-surface discovery and remediation |
| Key Strength | Vendor-stated identity data layer across modules; emphasis on non-human identities and Europe-specific compliance mapping | Control-plane enforcement and legacy authentication coverage | Discovery of unmanaged SaaS apps and identities |
| Key Weakness | Sparse public third-party reviews and limited publicly documented security certification evidence; pricing not transparent | Market feedback indicates channel/partner variability in pricing and implementation needs | May not provide the depth of ITDR investigation workflows found in dedicated ITDR platforms |
Narrative analysis
- Direct competitors and differentiators
- 8Layers differentiates by combining posture, detection/response, and compliance evidence features within a single platform rather than being positioned as a single-point solution.
- Buyer organisations commonly evaluate both consolidated-platform approaches and a best-of-breed pattern: ISPM and identity-attack-surface tools, ITDR and AD/Entra-focused detection tools, and compliance automation/GRC tooling.
- Feature comparison: where 8Layers appears to excel vs lag behind (based on vendor statements and available materials)
- Potential strengths (based on vendor detail):
- Identity graph/context approach spanning identity providers and cloud providers
- Explicit handling of non-human identities as distinct identity types
- Continuous mapping of identity controls to multiple frameworks including ENS and NIS2
- Potential risks / areas requiring validation:
- Depth and maturity relative to established vendors with larger telemetry sets and longer operational histories
- Breadth of integrations and compliance report packs compared with long-established compliance tooling
- Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives
- 8Layers: no public price; enterprise quote-based.
- Silverfort: pricing also not broadly public; third-party procurement documents report per-user annual pricing in some channels but may vary by region and partner.
- Buyers should compare the commercial case for consolidating multiple tools into one platform versus assembling a best-of-breed stack, and account for potential duplicated data pipelines and export costs.
- Customer testimonials comparing this product to competitors
- No verifiable end-user testimonials comparing 8Layers to competitors were found in public review sources.
- Market share and adoption trends
- Not found in authoritative public sources in the accessible corpus.
- When customers choose competitors instead (and why)
- Typical decision drivers in the market (generalised):
- Microsoft-heavy organisations often prioritize Microsoft-native identity security tooling for consolidation
- AD-centric organisations often select AD-focused vendors for resilience and recovery capabilities
- Organisations needing enforcement across legacy auth flows often consider enforcement-first vendors
- Organisations seeking rapid SaaS identity discovery may prioritize SaaS-focused identity attack-surface tools