Actively AI

Name: Actively AI
Brand: Actively AI
Rating: 4.9 (12 reviews)

AI Native

AI agents for enterprise-scale GTM teams. Powering the world's most ambitious revenue teams.

Est 2021|Valuation $88.5M|Raised $22.5M|10 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 17K|Web traffic 18K|FTEs 81|HQ New York, New York, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Actively AI appears to differentiate - Vendor materials and some reviews emphasize decision quality (who/when/why) rather than maximizing outreach volume. - Reviews highlight simplified rep workflows (a single prioritized view) and hands-on support. Where competitors may be stronger - 6sense / Demandbase: More mature capabilities for intent signals, advertising orchestration, and broader platform coverage. - ZoomInfo / Apollo: Typically stronger on contact database breadth, large-scale enrichment, and self-serve purchasing (especially Apollo). If the primary need is an extensive verified contact database, those vendors may offer more direct solutions. Pricing comparison (what’s known publicly) - Actively: quote-based. - Demandbase: quote-based; the company publicly describes packaging approaches. - 6sense: has a free tier for select Sales Intelligence features; paid tiers are quote-based. Adoption trends / market evidence - Independent press coverage exists focused on recent financing and positioning relative to other AI-driven sales tools. - Review volume is limited, suggesting early-stage adoption relative to larger incumbents.

	Actively AI	6sense (Sales Intelligence)	Demandbase (Demandbase One)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Free tier exists; paid is quote-based	Quote-based (platform fee + per-user fee described)
Primary use case	Teams seeking CRM-trained next-best-action recommendations and per-account automated prioritization	Organizations wanting intent signals, broad account data, and predictive scoring	Organizations running account-based GTM across Sales, Marketing, and Ads with unified ABM workflows
Key Strength	Hands-on support (per reviews); workflow prioritization; vendor claims of customer-specific model training	Mature intent ecosystem and breadth of account-based signals	ABM suite breadth and Sales/Marketing orchestration
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; value depends on CRM data quality; limited independent validation	Complexity and cost; often requires significant enablement	Enterprise-weighted implementation and cost; may be over-provisioned for smaller teams

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Actively AI appears to differentiate

Vendor materials and some reviews emphasize decision quality (who/when/why) rather than maximizing outreach volume.
Reviews highlight simplified rep workflows (a single prioritized view) and hands-on support.

Where competitors may be stronger

6sense / Demandbase: More mature capabilities for intent signals, advertising orchestration, and broader platform coverage.
ZoomInfo / Apollo: Typically stronger on contact database breadth, large-scale enrichment, and self-serve purchasing (especially Apollo). If the primary need is an extensive verified contact database, those vendors may offer more direct solutions.

Pricing comparison (what’s known publicly)

Actively: quote-based.
Demandbase: quote-based; the company publicly describes packaging approaches.
6sense: has a free tier for select Sales Intelligence features; paid tiers are quote-based.

Adoption trends / market evidence

Independent press coverage exists focused on recent financing and positioning relative to other AI-driven sales tools.
Review volume is limited, suggesting early-stage adoption relative to larger incumbents.

	Actively AI	6sense (Sales Intelligence)	Demandbase (Demandbase One)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Free tier exists; paid is quote-based	Quote-based (platform fee + per-user fee described)
Primary use case	Teams seeking CRM-trained next-best-action recommendations and per-account automated prioritization	Organizations wanting intent signals, broad account data, and predictive scoring	Organizations running account-based GTM across Sales, Marketing, and Ads with unified ABM workflows
Key Strength	Hands-on support (per reviews); workflow prioritization; vendor claims of customer-specific model training	Mature intent ecosystem and breadth of account-based signals	ABM suite breadth and Sales/Marketing orchestration
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; value depends on CRM data quality; limited independent validation	Complexity and cost; often requires significant enablement	Enterprise-weighted implementation and cost; may be over-provisioned for smaller teams

Actively AI

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map