Activity Stream
The platform for the people behind the show.
Published Sep 19, 2026
| Starting Price | Quote-based (no public list pricing) | Service-charge model with pricing on request | Quote-based / per-ticket models available; list pricing not publicly posted |
| Suggested Fit | Organizations in live entertainment seeking an integrated marketing / planning / visitor experience layer that pulls data from multiple ticketing systems | Arts and culture organizations prioritizing ticketing/CRM with strong services and implementation support | Organizations seeking ticketing + e-commerce + CRM with flexible pricing approaches |
| Key Strength | Ticketing-oriented marketing analytics and segmentation; integrated approach across planning and in-venue engagement via acquired products; multiple listed integrations | Strong services/implementation emphasis; aligns vendor with client operational models | Broad ticketing and commerce feature set with vendor positioning around transparent fee messaging |
| Key Weakness | Limited independent reviews in public platforms; unclear public security certification documentation; pricing not published; website content hygiene concern flagged during review | Pricing not transparent in a simple list; may require substantial platform alignment and change management | Pricing and fit can vary by segment; list pricing not consistently published |
Activity Stream focuses on marketing intelligence and audience activation for ticket sales, and integrates planning (Yesplan) and in-venue engagement (crowdEngage) into one suite. Competitors such as Spektrix and AudienceView operate more from the ticketing/CRM system-of-record layer, while Activity Stream acts as an overlay that ingests ticketing and marketing channel data to support analytics and activation.
If an organization already relies heavily on a ticketing/CRM vendor’s reporting and marketing modules, Activity Stream should justify incremental ROI relative to that vendor’s native capabilities.