adam.ai

Name: adam.ai
Brand: adam.ai

An intelligent governance ecosystem that empowers leaders to move, decide, and govern with confidence in the era of AI

Est 2018|3 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 22K|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 58|HQ San Jose, California, US

MarketsBoard Management Board Management Software

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

adam.ai vs Fellow.app - Fellow provides clearer pricing and packaging, larger review volume, and broader recognition in meeting productivity. - adam.ai focuses more on governance workflows (minutes approval cycles, board/committee framing, meeting spaces, governance analytics). - Organizations whose primary requirement is an AI note-taker and recaps may find Fellow easier to purchase and deploy. Organizations whose requirement is governance-grade meeting artifacts and accountability may find adam.ai more suitable. adam.ai vs Boardable (board portal) - Boardable provides explicit per-user pricing and positions for boards/committees with portal features. - adam.ai spans board/committee governance and broader enterprise/project meetings, with an AI assistant component. - Buyers should compare board packet workflows, e-signatures, audit logs, data residency, and admin controls when evaluating either product. adam.ai vs Diligent/OnBoard/BoardEffect (enterprise board portals) - The incumbents are established in board portal procurement and often serve large enterprises. - Pricing for those vendors is typically quote-based and can be higher; they may provide deeper governance-specific features and enterprise references. - For deep governance suites, extensive compliance add-ons, and mature enterprise references, the incumbents are often chosen despite higher cost.

	adam.ai	Fellow.app	Boardable
Starting Price	Sales-led Request Pricing on official site (Business/Enterprise). Third parties list historical per-user plans; validate directly.	Free plan; paid self-serve per-user tiers with entry-level paid and higher business tiers	Transparent per-user pricing with tiered Essentials/Professional options billed annually
Best For	Governance-oriented meeting workflows (boards/committees/projects) needing minutes approval, decision tracking, and structured artifacts	Teams seeking meeting productivity and integrated AI note-taking with clear self-serve packaging	Boards/committees (notably nonprofits) wanting board portal features with transparent per-user pricing
Key Strength	Meeting lifecycle + governance workflow + action/decision structure; enterprise posture with SOC 2 compliance referenced in public materials	Large review volume, rapid onboarding, transparent pricing, broad meeting productivity features	Transparent board-focused pricing; strong governance/portal feature framing
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; mixed signals on packaging; smaller review volume; integration gaps reported by some reviewers	May be less tailored for formal board governance workflows compared with dedicated board portals	May be less focused on enterprise governance intelligence; costs can increase with user count

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

adam.ai vs Fellow.app

Fellow provides clearer pricing and packaging, larger review volume, and broader recognition in meeting productivity.
adam.ai focuses more on governance workflows (minutes approval cycles, board/committee framing, meeting spaces, governance analytics).
Organizations whose primary requirement is an AI note-taker and recaps may find Fellow easier to purchase and deploy. Organizations whose requirement is governance-grade meeting artifacts and accountability may find adam.ai more suitable.

adam.ai vs Boardable (board portal)

Boardable provides explicit per-user pricing and positions for boards/committees with portal features.
adam.ai spans board/committee governance and broader enterprise/project meetings, with an AI assistant component.
Buyers should compare board packet workflows, e-signatures, audit logs, data residency, and admin controls when evaluating either product.

adam.ai vs Diligent/OnBoard/BoardEffect (enterprise board portals)

The incumbents are established in board portal procurement and often serve large enterprises.
Pricing for those vendors is typically quote-based and can be higher; they may provide deeper governance-specific features and enterprise references.
For deep governance suites, extensive compliance add-ons, and mature enterprise references, the incumbents are often chosen despite higher cost.

	adam.ai	Fellow.app	Boardable
Starting Price	Sales-led Request Pricing on official site (Business/Enterprise). Third parties list historical per-user plans; validate directly.	Free plan; paid self-serve per-user tiers with entry-level paid and higher business tiers	Transparent per-user pricing with tiered Essentials/Professional options billed annually
Best For	Governance-oriented meeting workflows (boards/committees/projects) needing minutes approval, decision tracking, and structured artifacts	Teams seeking meeting productivity and integrated AI note-taking with clear self-serve packaging	Boards/committees (notably nonprofits) wanting board portal features with transparent per-user pricing
Key Strength	Meeting lifecycle + governance workflow + action/decision structure; enterprise posture with SOC 2 compliance referenced in public materials	Large review volume, rapid onboarding, transparent pricing, broad meeting productivity features	Transparent board-focused pricing; strong governance/portal feature framing
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; mixed signals on packaging; smaller review volume; integration gaps reported by some reviewers	May be less tailored for formal board governance workflows compared with dedicated board portals	May be less focused on enterprise governance intelligence; costs can increase with user count