Adobe Dreamweaver

Name: Adobe Dreamweaver
Brand: Adobe
Rating: 4.1 (2953 reviews)

Leader

Empowering everyone to create. ✨

Est 1982|Valuation $97.9B|Raised $8.2B

LinkedIn 5.5M|Website|Web traffic 351.9M|FTEs 31,360|HQ San Jose, California, US

MarketsCode Editors & IDEs

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Dreamweaver vs VS Code (editor-first approach): - VS Code is generally better aligned with modern developer workflows due to its extensibility, performance, and alignment with JavaScript frameworks and DevOps processes. Dreamweaver differentiates on integrated Live View and legacy site management features. Dreamweaver vs Webflow (hosted visual platform): - Webflow provides an integrated publishing experience (hosting/SSL/CMS) that reduces operational overhead. Dreamweaver provides local file control and hosting flexibility but requires the organization to manage deployment and environments. Dreamweaver vs Pinegrow (hybrid desktop visual editor): - Pinegrow positions itself as a modern hybrid visual editor with different licensing approaches. Organizations standardized on Adobe licensing or requiring Creative Cloud integration may continue to prefer Dreamweaver.

Market adoption trends (qualitative)

Community discussions and developer forums indicate Dreamweaver is less common in contemporary professional web development than historically. Usage is concentrated in legacy maintenance and specific niches.

	Adobe Dreamweaver	Visual Studio Code	Webflow
Starting Price	Published Creative Cloud subscription pricing (vendor-published per-app/subscription rates)	Free / open-source (no published per-seat cost)	Published tiered site and workspace plans (pricing varies by plan and features)
Best For	Maintenance of legacy HTML/CSS sites; combined visual and code workflows; Adobe CC users	Modern development workflows; extensibility; Git-first teams	Designers and marketers requiring hosted visual building, CMS, and integrated hosting
Key Strength	Live View plus code editor and basic site management combined in a desktop tool	Lightweight, extensible, strong ecosystem and modern dev support	Hosted publishing with integrated hosting and SSL; design-centric collaboration
Key Weakness	Resource usage and perceived datedness; limited alignment with modern framework toolchains	Not a WYSIWYG site builder; requires assembling a toolchain for publishing	Pricing structure and potential vendor lock-in; less direct control over hosting and codebase

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Dreamweaver vs VS Code (editor-first approach):

VS Code is generally better aligned with modern developer workflows due to its extensibility, performance, and alignment with JavaScript frameworks and DevOps processes. Dreamweaver differentiates on integrated Live View and legacy site management features.

Dreamweaver vs Webflow (hosted visual platform):

Webflow provides an integrated publishing experience (hosting/SSL/CMS) that reduces operational overhead. Dreamweaver provides local file control and hosting flexibility but requires the organization to manage deployment and environments.

Dreamweaver vs Pinegrow (hybrid desktop visual editor):

Pinegrow positions itself as a modern hybrid visual editor with different licensing approaches. Organizations standardized on Adobe licensing or requiring Creative Cloud integration may continue to prefer Dreamweaver.

Market adoption trends (qualitative)

Community discussions and developer forums indicate Dreamweaver is less common in contemporary professional web development than historically. Usage is concentrated in legacy maintenance and specific niches.

	Adobe Dreamweaver	Visual Studio Code	Webflow
Starting Price	Published Creative Cloud subscription pricing (vendor-published per-app/subscription rates)	Free / open-source (no published per-seat cost)	Published tiered site and workspace plans (pricing varies by plan and features)
Best For	Maintenance of legacy HTML/CSS sites; combined visual and code workflows; Adobe CC users	Modern development workflows; extensibility; Git-first teams	Designers and marketers requiring hosted visual building, CMS, and integrated hosting
Key Strength	Live View plus code editor and basic site management combined in a desktop tool	Lightweight, extensible, strong ecosystem and modern dev support	Hosted publishing with integrated hosting and SSL; design-centric collaboration
Key Weakness	Resource usage and perceived datedness; limited alignment with modern framework toolchains	Not a WYSIWYG site builder; requires assembling a toolchain for publishing	Pricing structure and potential vendor lock-in; less direct control over hosting and codebase