Agnoris

Name: Agnoris
Brand: Agnoris

Helping the restaurant community we love make more profit and have happier customers with a lot less effort.

Est 2017|Raised $275K

LinkedIn 64|Website|FTEs 1|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsBusiness Intelligence (BI) and Analytics

01Competitive Landscape

Agnoris competes in a market where buyers often choose between:

focused analytics offerings (menu engineering, margin optimization)
full-service restaurant platforms (POS + payroll + inventory + reporting)

Narrative analysis

- Against Toast/TouchBistro (POS suites): Agnoris is positioned as an analytics-first option rather than a POS replacement. If Agnoris can integrate cleanly, it may be less disruptive than switching POS providers. POS suites may be preferred when an operator wants a single vendor for orders, payments, and reporting with integrated workflows. - Against Restaurant365: Restaurant365's strength is deep operational accounting and inventory/recipe costing. Agnoris appears to act as a recommendation layer that could complement, or in some cases be substituted by, robust reporting within an ERP-like system depending on buyer needs. - Against Nory (AI operations platform): Nory has publicly indicated recent fundraising and growth signals. Nory may be favored for groups seeking a broader operating system and rapid product development; Agnoris may be lighter-weight and more narrowly focused.

Market share and adoption trends

No reliable, direct market share data for Agnoris was found. Website traffic estimators indicate relatively low traffic for the vendor's site, but those metrics are approximate and not definitive proxies for customer count.

	Agnoris	Toast	Restaurant365
Starting Price	Published entry pricing reported by third-party directories; historically noted higher annual per-location pricing in older recaps	Entry software fees vary; meaningful total cost includes processing and add-ons; typically contract-based	Published per-location monthly pricing reported by third-party sources (annual billing)
Best For	Operators seeking recurring, recommendation-oriented analytics without replacing POS/ERP	Operators seeking an integrated POS ecosystem with payments, online ordering, and reporting	Operators needing accounting-focused operations (inventory/recipe costing) and enterprise reporting
Key Strength	Focused on profit-improvement recommendations across menu/labor/delivery (per directories)	End-to-end operating stack and ecosystem integrations	Deep back-office controls (accounting, inventory, recipe costing)
Key Weakness	Limited public proof (limited reviews, unclear security posture, unclear integrations)	Can be expensive when modules and payment processing are added; potential vendor lock-in	Higher base cost; can be complex to implement

01Competitive Landscape

Agnoris competes in a market where buyers often choose between:

focused analytics offerings (menu engineering, margin optimization)
full-service restaurant platforms (POS + payroll + inventory + reporting)

Narrative analysis

Against Toast/TouchBistro (POS suites): Agnoris is positioned as an analytics-first option rather than a POS replacement. If Agnoris can integrate cleanly, it may be less disruptive than switching POS providers. POS suites may be preferred when an operator wants a single vendor for orders, payments, and reporting with integrated workflows.
Against Restaurant365: Restaurant365's strength is deep operational accounting and inventory/recipe costing. Agnoris appears to act as a recommendation layer that could complement, or in some cases be substituted by, robust reporting within an ERP-like system depending on buyer needs.
Against Nory (AI operations platform): Nory has publicly indicated recent fundraising and growth signals. Nory may be favored for groups seeking a broader operating system and rapid product development; Agnoris may be lighter-weight and more narrowly focused.

Market share and adoption trends

	Agnoris	Toast	Restaurant365
Starting Price	Published entry pricing reported by third-party directories; historically noted higher annual per-location pricing in older recaps	Entry software fees vary; meaningful total cost includes processing and add-ons; typically contract-based	Published per-location monthly pricing reported by third-party sources (annual billing)
Best For	Operators seeking recurring, recommendation-oriented analytics without replacing POS/ERP	Operators seeking an integrated POS ecosystem with payments, online ordering, and reporting	Operators needing accounting-focused operations (inventory/recipe costing) and enterprise reporting
Key Strength	Focused on profit-improvement recommendations across menu/labor/delivery (per directories)	End-to-end operating stack and ecosystem integrations	Deep back-office controls (accounting, inventory, recipe costing)
Key Weakness	Limited public proof (limited reviews, unclear security posture, unclear integrations)	Can be expensive when modules and payment processing are added; potential vendor lock-in	Higher base cost; can be complex to implement