Agrosmart

Name: Agrosmart
Brand: Cláudio Marquezeli

Accelerating the transition of agrifood systems through design and technology

Est 2014|Raised $13.3M|27 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 33K|Website|FTEs 66|HQ Campinas, São Paulo, BR

MarketsSupplier Intelligence

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas of relative strength: - Region-specific focus and localization for Latin American languages, crops, and operating contexts. - Integration of farmer network data and field-level ground-truth concepts for supply intelligence. - Explicit product components for ESG MRV and offline evidence capture. Where alternatives may have advantages: - Competitors sometimes publish information security and compliance certifications publicly (e.g., ISO 27001) and maintain more detailed trust centers. - Pricing transparency differs by vendor; some competitors publish tiered pricing in certain markets. Customer testimonial comparisons: - No public “we switched from X to Agrosmart” type of reference was found in the reviewed sources. This is a gap that should be explored during reference checks. Market adoption trends: - The vendor reports growth and network scale in public profiles and press summaries; these figures are vendor-reported and not independently audited.

	Agrosmart	Climate FieldView	CropX
Starting Price	BoosterAGRO: Free (public). BoosterPRO/Nexus/ESG: not publicly listed; demo-led. Historical media reporting has cited a wide range of prices depending on scope.	In some markets, basic tiers are offered at no charge with paid Plus/Premium tiers available.	Hardware plus subscription model. Sensors are sold through vendor channels and subscriptions vary by offering.
Primary use case	Latin America-focused climate and agronomic intelligence, plus supply chain and ESG MRV capabilities.	Farmers needing integrated field data collection, visualization, and prescriptions within the FieldView ecosystem.	Irrigation and soil moisture intelligence programs with sensor-driven decision workflows.
Key strengths	Regional focus; farmer network data inputs; integrated MRV/supply intelligence functionality.	Publicly listed pricing in some markets and a mature platform ecosystem with many integrations.	Productized sensor offerings and clear hardware-plus-subscription economics.
Key weaknesses	Limited third-party B2B review coverage; limited public security documentation; at least one public complaint related to data accuracy; enterprise pricing and integrations are opaque.	Some features depend on ecosystem components and add-ons; may be less tailored to specific Latin American conditions compared with local vendors.	Requires sensor deployment and ongoing maintenance; cost of scaling sensors can be substantial.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas of relative strength:

Region-specific focus and localization for Latin American languages, crops, and operating contexts.
Integration of farmer network data and field-level ground-truth concepts for supply intelligence.
Explicit product components for ESG MRV and offline evidence capture.

Where alternatives may have advantages:

Competitors sometimes publish information security and compliance certifications publicly (e.g., ISO 27001) and maintain more detailed trust centers.
Pricing transparency differs by vendor; some competitors publish tiered pricing in certain markets.

Customer testimonial comparisons:

No public “we switched from X to Agrosmart” type of reference was found in the reviewed sources. This is a gap that should be explored during reference checks.

Market adoption trends:

The vendor reports growth and network scale in public profiles and press summaries; these figures are vendor-reported and not independently audited.

	Agrosmart	Climate FieldView	CropX
Starting Price	BoosterAGRO: Free (public). BoosterPRO/Nexus/ESG: not publicly listed; demo-led. Historical media reporting has cited a wide range of prices depending on scope.	In some markets, basic tiers are offered at no charge with paid Plus/Premium tiers available.	Hardware plus subscription model. Sensors are sold through vendor channels and subscriptions vary by offering.
Primary use case	Latin America-focused climate and agronomic intelligence, plus supply chain and ESG MRV capabilities.	Farmers needing integrated field data collection, visualization, and prescriptions within the FieldView ecosystem.	Irrigation and soil moisture intelligence programs with sensor-driven decision workflows.
Key strengths	Regional focus; farmer network data inputs; integrated MRV/supply intelligence functionality.	Publicly listed pricing in some markets and a mature platform ecosystem with many integrations.	Productized sensor offerings and clear hardware-plus-subscription economics.
Key weaknesses	Limited third-party B2B review coverage; limited public security documentation; at least one public complaint related to data accuracy; enterprise pricing and integrations are opaque.	Some features depend on ecosystem components and add-ons; may be less tailored to specific Latin American conditions compared with local vendors.	Requires sensor deployment and ongoing maintenance; cost of scaling sensors can be substantial.