Alasco

Name: Alasco
Brand: Alasco

Alasco is a cloud-based financial controlling and ESG management platform for real estate projects that centralizes budgets, contracts/orders, invoices, forecasting/cash flow and stakeholder reporting into a single source of record.

Est 2018|Valuation $44.9M|Raised $48.3M|50 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 18K|Web traffic 3K|FTEs 131|HQ Munich, Bavaria, DE

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where alternatives may be preferable

- For organizations that prioritize construction execution (RFIs, submittals, field coordination) over finance controlling, Procore or Autodesk Build typically offer broader field execution features and larger construction ecosystems. - For organizations seeking transparent per-user SaaS pricing and a self-serve trial model, PlanRadar’s pricing and trial model may reduce procurement friction. - For procurement processes that require immediate access to third-party security attestations (SOC 2/ISO), vendors with publicly documented certifications may proceed through procurement more quickly than vendors that have not provided attestation evidence.

Adoption trends / market presence

The vendor presents itself as serving a broad customer base and provides customer examples on its site.
Third-party funding coverage indicates investor interest and financial backing in the vendor’s sector and positioning.

	Alasco	PlanRadar	Procore
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (usage-based; invoice volume)	Entry-level per-user/month pricing	Not publicly listed (quote-based, varies by modules)
Primary use case	Real estate development and asset organizations seeking finance controlling and ESG/retrofit planning	Construction/site teams needing tickets, documentation, workflows	Construction organizations needing full-suite project management and collaboration
Key strengths	Combines financial controlling and ESG planning; multi-project controlling; emphasis on auditability	Transparent entry pricing; self-serve trial; site documentation workflows	Broad construction ecosystem; extensive integration options; strong on-site adoption
Key weaknesses	Limited third-party review volume in public listings; formal certification attestations are not publicly documented	Less specialized for real estate finance controlling and ESG strategy	Can be complex/costly and is construction-focused rather than controller-focused

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where alternatives may be preferable

For organizations that prioritize construction execution (RFIs, submittals, field coordination) over finance controlling, Procore or Autodesk Build typically offer broader field execution features and larger construction ecosystems.
For organizations seeking transparent per-user SaaS pricing and a self-serve trial model, PlanRadar’s pricing and trial model may reduce procurement friction.
For procurement processes that require immediate access to third-party security attestations (SOC 2/ISO), vendors with publicly documented certifications may proceed through procurement more quickly than vendors that have not provided attestation evidence.

Adoption trends / market presence

The vendor presents itself as serving a broad customer base and provides customer examples on its site.
Third-party funding coverage indicates investor interest and financial backing in the vendor’s sector and positioning.

	Alasco	PlanRadar	Procore
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (usage-based; invoice volume)	Entry-level per-user/month pricing	Not publicly listed (quote-based, varies by modules)
Primary use case	Real estate development and asset organizations seeking finance controlling and ESG/retrofit planning	Construction/site teams needing tickets, documentation, workflows	Construction organizations needing full-suite project management and collaboration
Key strengths	Combines financial controlling and ESG planning; multi-project controlling; emphasis on auditability	Transparent entry pricing; self-serve trial; site documentation workflows	Broad construction ecosystem; extensive integration options; strong on-site adoption
Key weaknesses	Limited third-party review volume in public listings; formal certification attestations are not publicly documented	Less specialized for real estate finance controlling and ESG strategy	Can be complex/costly and is construction-focused rather than controller-focused

Alasco

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where alternatives may be preferable

Adoption trends / market presence

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where alternatives may be preferable

Adoption trends / market presence

02Market Map