Alt

Name: Alt
Brand: Alt

alt Inc.

Est 2014|Valuation $1.2M|Raised $86.4M|8 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 35|HQ Minato-Ku, Tokyo Metropolis, JP

- **Alt vs Otter/Fireflies (feature posture):** Alt’s public materials emphasize Japanese-language performance, personalization, and quota-based enterprise plans; Otter and Fireflies emphasize agent-like features, broader integrations, and a larger English-language user base. - **Pricing comparison:** - Alt: low individual entry price in JPY, with substantial enterprise pricing and explicit overage fees. - Fireflies: transparent per-seat pricing with potential add-on credits for some features. - Otter: typically priced per user with tiered plans (buyers should confirm current pricing on each vendor’s official pricing page before procurement). - **Market adoption signals:** Vendor-published user counts indicate local traction, but the vendor’s presence on global review platforms appears limited compared with some competitors.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Alt vs Otter/Fireflies (feature posture): Alt’s public materials emphasize Japanese-language performance, personalization, and quota-based enterprise plans; Otter and Fireflies emphasize agent-like features, broader integrations, and a larger English-language user base.
Pricing comparison:
- Alt: low individual entry price in JPY, with substantial enterprise pricing and explicit overage fees.
- Fireflies: transparent per-seat pricing with potential add-on credits for some features.
- Otter: typically priced per user with tiered plans (buyers should confirm current pricing on each vendor’s official pricing page before procurement).
Market adoption signals: Vendor-published user counts indicate local traction, but the vendor’s presence on global review platforms appears limited compared with some competitors.

	Alt (AI GIJIROKU)	Otter.ai	Fireflies.ai
Starting Price	Free tier; personal tier in the low-hundreds JPY/month	Free tier; paid plans vary (USD)	Free tier; Pro starts at low double-digits per seat/month billed annually (per vendor docs)
Best For	Organizations focused on Japanese-language transcription and translation; teams requiring plan quotas and controlled model-learning options	English-language teams and broad meeting-agent workflows	Teams seeking integrated meeting bots and multi-platform integrations
Key Strength	Local language focus and vendor-defined plan controls (quotas, learning opt-out)	Broad brand awareness and rapid feature development in meeting agents	Extensive integrations and established admin features
Key Weakness	Limited independent review presence on global platforms; enterprise security/compliance documentation is not clearly published; quota/overage model adds cost variability	Feature and pricing changes between tiers can impact predictability	Certain AI features may require additional credits; privacy and retention policies may require legal review

Alt

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map