Amazing Charts

Name: Amazing Charts
Brand: Amazing Charts
Rating: 3.6 (106 reviews)

Founded by a physician, Amazing Charts offers affordable and usable solutions for medical practices.

Est 2001|1 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 3K|Web traffic 8K|FTEs 55|HQ West Warwick, Rhode Island, US

MarketsERP

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Amazing Charts | Practice Fusion | RXNT | |--------|---------------|----------------|------| | Starting Price | Published base pricing available from the vendor; varies by deployment and plan (vendor-published) | Published base pricing available from the vendor; typically offered as a cloud subscription (vendor-published; annual commitment typical) | Published base pricing available from the vendor; modular tiers and add-ons referenced in vendor materials | | Recommended For | Independent small-to-mid outpatient practices that prefer a familiar chart layout and may require on-prem and cloud deployment options | Budget-focused small practices seeking a cloud-native base EHR | Price-sensitive practices seeking modular pricing and suite options | | Key Strength | Deployment flexibility (cloud + on-prem) and workflow-oriented UI reported by some users as straightforward | Cloud-native simplicity and lower headline base price | Lower entry pricing for some packages; modular suite options | | Key Weakness | User-reported stability/performance issues and additional integration/add-on fees in some cases | Cloud-only deployment (no on-prem option); prior history of model changes noted in industry commentary | Support and feature trade-offs reported by some users; variability by configuration | - Direct competitors and their key differentiators - Practice Fusion: cloud-only, lower headline price; positioned for simple setups. - RXNT: emphasizes lower base-price options and modularity. - AdvancedMD: broader suite with optional RCM; positioned toward larger practices and typically higher cost. - Feature comparison: areas of relative strength and risk - Strengths for Amazing Charts: - On-prem deployment option uncommon among small-practice EHRs. - Multiple reviewers describe basic charting and scheduling as straightforward to learn. - Risk areas: - Reports of application instability and perceived feature gaps relative to newer platforms. - Integration costs and additional fees for third-party connectors. - Pricing comparison and value - Amazing Charts often lists a higher headline base price than some competitors but includes deployment options (on-prem) that some buyers may value; buyers should model total cost of ownership including add-ons, integration costs, and support commitments. - Market share and adoption trends - Earlier acquisition materials referenced an installed base figure at that time; recent independent adoption figures were not located in the sources reviewed. - Why buyers choose competitors instead - Buyers who prioritize lowest headline monthly price, the largest integration ecosystems, modern UX, or documented enterprise security attestations may evaluate alternatives such as Practice Fusion, RXNT, athenaOne, eClinicalWorks, or Elation.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Amazing Charts	Practice Fusion	RXNT
Starting Price	Published base pricing available from the vendor; varies by deployment and plan (vendor-published)	Published base pricing available from the vendor; typically offered as a cloud subscription (vendor-published; annual commitment typical)	Published base pricing available from the vendor; modular tiers and add-ons referenced in vendor materials
Recommended For	Independent small-to-mid outpatient practices that prefer a familiar chart layout and may require on-prem and cloud deployment options	Budget-focused small practices seeking a cloud-native base EHR	Price-sensitive practices seeking modular pricing and suite options
Key Strength	Deployment flexibility (cloud + on-prem) and workflow-oriented UI reported by some users as straightforward	Cloud-native simplicity and lower headline base price	Lower entry pricing for some packages; modular suite options
Key Weakness	User-reported stability/performance issues and additional integration/add-on fees in some cases	Cloud-only deployment (no on-prem option); prior history of model changes noted in industry commentary	Support and feature trade-offs reported by some users; variability by configuration

Direct competitors and their key differentiators
- Practice Fusion: cloud-only, lower headline price; positioned for simple setups.
- RXNT: emphasizes lower base-price options and modularity.
- AdvancedMD: broader suite with optional RCM; positioned toward larger practices and typically higher cost.
Feature comparison: areas of relative strength and risk
- Strengths for Amazing Charts:
  - On-prem deployment option uncommon among small-practice EHRs.
  - Multiple reviewers describe basic charting and scheduling as straightforward to learn.
- Risk areas:
  - Reports of application instability and perceived feature gaps relative to newer platforms.
  - Integration costs and additional fees for third-party connectors.
Pricing comparison and value
- Amazing Charts often lists a higher headline base price than some competitors but includes deployment options (on-prem) that some buyers may value; buyers should model total cost of ownership including add-ons, integration costs, and support commitments.
Market share and adoption trends
- Earlier acquisition materials referenced an installed base figure at that time; recent independent adoption figures were not located in the sources reviewed.
Why buyers choose competitors instead
- Buyers who prioritize lowest headline monthly price, the largest integration ecosystems, modern UX, or documented enterprise security attestations may evaluate alternatives such as Practice Fusion, RXNT, athenaOne, eClinicalWorks, or Elation.

Aspect

Amazing Charts

Practice Fusion

RXNT

Starting Price

Published base pricing available from the vendor; varies by deployment and plan (vendor-published)

Published base pricing available from the vendor; typically offered as a cloud subscription (vendor-published; annual commitment typical)

Published base pricing available from the vendor; modular tiers and add-ons referenced in vendor materials

Recommended For

Independent small-to-mid outpatient practices that prefer a familiar chart layout and may require on-prem and cloud deployment options

Budget-focused small practices seeking a cloud-native base EHR

Price-sensitive practices seeking modular pricing and suite options

Key Strength

Deployment flexibility (cloud + on-prem) and workflow-oriented UI reported by some users as straightforward

Cloud-native simplicity and lower headline base price

Lower entry pricing for some packages; modular suite options

Key Weakness

User-reported stability/performance issues and additional integration/add-on fees in some cases

Cloud-only deployment (no on-prem option); prior history of model changes noted in industry commentary

Support and feature trade-offs reported by some users; variability by configuration