Metaroom by Amrax®

Name: Metaroom by Amrax®
Brand: Metaroom by Amrax®
Rating: 4.5 (49 reviews)

AI Native

Digital as-built capture for existing buildings - in minutes.

Est 2020

LinkedIn 3K|Web traffic 10K|FTEs 22|HQ Puch bei Hallein, Salzburg, AT

MarketsOffice & Space Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives can excel)

- Matterport: Often used for end-to-end hosted 3D tour experiences and has a mature hosting/viewing ecosystem. If the primary output is client-facing tours and a hosted viewer, Matterport’s ecosystem may be preferable. For CAD/BIM exports from phone LiDAR workflows, Metaroom or Polycam may be more directly focused on those deliverables. - Canvas: Appropriate when buyers prefer pay-per-deliverable CAD outputs with per-area pricing rather than a per-user subscription. - magicplan: Well-suited for insurance/restoration documentation and exports (ESX/FML) and for users who prefer project-based pricing.

Adoption trends / market presence

Vendor partnership announcements (Autodesk Construction Cloud, RELUX, Siemens mentions) indicate channel and integration activity but are not equivalent to broad market penetration metrics.
Review counts on platforms like Capterra/GetApp indicate some traction but with limited sample sizes; G2 showed limited review presence at the time of this review.

	Metaroom by Amrax	Polycam	magicplan
Starting Price	Published per-user starter pricing available from the vendor	Free tier available; published basic plan pricing available from the vendor	Published project-based pricing available from the vendor
Typical Use Case	AEC professionals needing structured IFC/DXF-style exports from iPhone/iPad LiDAR	Mixed creators and professionals; broader platform support and scanning + floor plans	Restoration/claims and field documentation workflows; project-based pricing
Key Strengths	Multiple CAD/BIM export formats; documented integrations (RELUX, Autodesk, Ranplan, etc.)	Multi-platform support and a broad creator ecosystem; clearer enterprise feature descriptions in public materials	Strong field documentation and claims workflows; project-based pricing options
Key Weaknesses	Apple LiDAR only; limitations with complex geometry and exterior envelope capture; security certifications not clearly published	Some features or pricing changes have generated community feedback; certain features are iOS-focused	Costs can scale with project volume; differs from per-user SaaS budgeting

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives can excel)

Matterport: Often used for end-to-end hosted 3D tour experiences and has a mature hosting/viewing ecosystem. If the primary output is client-facing tours and a hosted viewer, Matterport’s ecosystem may be preferable. For CAD/BIM exports from phone LiDAR workflows, Metaroom or Polycam may be more directly focused on those deliverables.
Canvas: Appropriate when buyers prefer pay-per-deliverable CAD outputs with per-area pricing rather than a per-user subscription.
magicplan: Well-suited for insurance/restoration documentation and exports (ESX/FML) and for users who prefer project-based pricing.

Adoption trends / market presence

Vendor partnership announcements (Autodesk Construction Cloud, RELUX, Siemens mentions) indicate channel and integration activity but are not equivalent to broad market penetration metrics.
Review counts on platforms like Capterra/GetApp indicate some traction but with limited sample sizes; G2 showed limited review presence at the time of this review.

	Metaroom by Amrax	Polycam	magicplan
Starting Price	Published per-user starter pricing available from the vendor	Free tier available; published basic plan pricing available from the vendor	Published project-based pricing available from the vendor
Typical Use Case	AEC professionals needing structured IFC/DXF-style exports from iPhone/iPad LiDAR	Mixed creators and professionals; broader platform support and scanning + floor plans	Restoration/claims and field documentation workflows; project-based pricing
Key Strengths	Multiple CAD/BIM export formats; documented integrations (RELUX, Autodesk, Ranplan, etc.)	Multi-platform support and a broad creator ecosystem; clearer enterprise feature descriptions in public materials	Strong field documentation and claims workflows; project-based pricing options
Key Weaknesses	Apple LiDAR only; limitations with complex geometry and exterior envelope capture; security certifications not clearly published	Some features or pricing changes have generated community feedback; certain features are iOS-focused	Costs can scale with project volume; differs from per-user SaaS budgeting