Anaplan Security & Administration

Name: Anaplan Security & Administration
Brand: Anaplan
Rating: 4.5 (1416 reviews)

Leader

Outpredict. Outplan. Outperform. Be the Next.

Est 2006|Valuation $9.6B|Raised $388.2M

LinkedIn 407K|Website|Web traffic 617K|FTEs 2,000|HQ Miami, Florida, US

MarketsBudgeting & Forecasting

Anaplan Security & Administration screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Anaplan vs Workday Adaptive Planning:
- Comparative reviews indicate Anaplan is often selected for more complex modeling needs but may require greater implementation effort; Adaptive Planning is often selected for simpler FP&A workflows and for organizations that are already invested in the Workday ecosystem.
Anaplan vs OneStream:
- Community commentary indicates OneStream is frequently selected when statutory consolidation and the close process are the primary requirements; Anaplan is often selected when flexible, cross-functional planning is the primary requirement.

- Anaplan vs Workday Adaptive Planning: - Comparative reviews indicate Anaplan is often selected for more complex modeling needs but may require greater implementation effort; Adaptive Planning is often selected for simpler FP&A workflows and for organizations that are already invested in the Workday ecosystem. - Anaplan vs OneStream: - Community commentary indicates OneStream is frequently selected when statutory consolidation and the close process are the primary requirements; Anaplan is often selected when flexible, cross-functional planning is the primary requirement.

Market adoption and trends

Review activity on major platforms indicates active deployments and ongoing buyer interest.
Private ownership and continued acquisition activity indicate continued product investment; buyers should consider potential changes in packaging, pricing, and support models associated with private ownership.

	Anaplan (Security & Admin)	Workday Adaptive Planning	OneStream
Starting Price	Quote-based; BYOK and other security options may be offered as add-ons	Quote-based; published pricing guidance is available from the vendor	Quote-based; varies by scope and deployment
Typical Fit	Enterprises requiring broad connected planning and centralized IAM/auditability	Organizations seeking structured FP&A, often in Workday-centric environments	Organizations prioritizing consolidation and financial close workflows
Key Strengths	SSO/SAML support, administration console, audit log capabilities, BYOK option	Integration with Workday ecosystem; perceived ease of adoption for finance users in some cases	Consolidation-focused features and reporting capabilities
Key Weaknesses	Implementation complexity, specialist/admin dependency, higher implementation and ownership costs	May be more constrained for advanced modeling versus platforms designed for broader modeling	May be less flexible for broad planning scenarios beyond consolidation