AppSheet

Name: AppSheet
Brand: AppSheet

AppSheet is now part of Google Cloud.

Est 2012|Valuation $60M|Raised $19.4M

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 8.9M|FTEs 19|HQ Seattle, Washington, US

MarketsWorkflow Automation Low-Code Development Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

**AppSheet vs Power Apps** - Power Apps is a direct enterprise alternative with published premium per-user pricing and a free developer option. - Power Apps typically performs well when an organization is standardized on Microsoft 365 and Dataverse and requires deep enterprise connectors and governance. - AppSheet is often selected where Google Workspace is dominant and where teams prioritize spreadsheet-to-app acceleration. **AppSheet vs Glide** - Glide is frequently cited in community discussions for providing a more polished UX; however, users cite pricing and data privacy behavior as considerations. - Glide’s business pricing is structured as a base subscription with included users and add-on costs, which can be cost-effective for certain team sizes but less so for very large deployments. **AppSheet vs Airtable/Bubble/FlutterFlow (adjacent competitors)** - **Airtable** is often used as a base/table platform with interfaces/automations; business plans are positioned above entry tiers but provide stronger base/table ergonomics and interface building for some workflows. - **Bubble** is oriented toward customer-facing web products and more complex UX, with different scaling and cost considerations. - **FlutterFlow** targets more developer-oriented builders; it offers free and paid tiers and capabilities such as code export—useful when teams want portability not typical in no-code platforms. **Market adoption trends (evidence-limited)** - Pre-acquisition reporting indicated traction in manufacturing and field operations use cases; post-acquisition growth metrics are not clearly published.

	AppSheet	Microsoft Power Apps	Glide
Starting Price	Tiered per-user monthly pricing (entry to enterprise tiers)	Per-user monthly pricing with free developer options and premium per-user tiers	Free tier (limited); business plan priced as a subscription with included users and add-ons
Best For	Internal apps from Sheets/SQL with Google ecosystem governance	Microsoft 365 + Dataverse-centric enterprises, deep connector ecosystem	Polished internal tools and simple business apps with stronger UX
Key Strength	Google Workspace alignment, no-code build with automations	Enterprise integration and governance within Microsoft stack	UX and app presentation; quick deployment
Key Weakness	UI customization limits; per-user scaling costs; complexity ceiling	Can become complex and costly with Dataverse/governance; licensing complexity	Can get expensive at scale; some users raise privacy/model concerns

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

AppSheet vs Power Apps

Power Apps is a direct enterprise alternative with published premium per-user pricing and a free developer option.
Power Apps typically performs well when an organization is standardized on Microsoft 365 and Dataverse and requires deep enterprise connectors and governance.
AppSheet is often selected where Google Workspace is dominant and where teams prioritize spreadsheet-to-app acceleration.

AppSheet vs Glide

Glide is frequently cited in community discussions for providing a more polished UX; however, users cite pricing and data privacy behavior as considerations.
Glide’s business pricing is structured as a base subscription with included users and add-on costs, which can be cost-effective for certain team sizes but less so for very large deployments.

AppSheet vs Airtable/Bubble/FlutterFlow (adjacent competitors)

Airtable is often used as a base/table platform with interfaces/automations; business plans are positioned above entry tiers but provide stronger base/table ergonomics and interface building for some workflows.
Bubble is oriented toward customer-facing web products and more complex UX, with different scaling and cost considerations.
FlutterFlow targets more developer-oriented builders; it offers free and paid tiers and capabilities such as code export—useful when teams want portability not typical in no-code platforms.

Market adoption trends (evidence-limited)

Pre-acquisition reporting indicated traction in manufacturing and field operations use cases; post-acquisition growth metrics are not clearly published.

	AppSheet	Microsoft Power Apps	Glide
Starting Price	Tiered per-user monthly pricing (entry to enterprise tiers)	Per-user monthly pricing with free developer options and premium per-user tiers	Free tier (limited); business plan priced as a subscription with included users and add-ons
Best For	Internal apps from Sheets/SQL with Google ecosystem governance	Microsoft 365 + Dataverse-centric enterprises, deep connector ecosystem	Polished internal tools and simple business apps with stronger UX
Key Strength	Google Workspace alignment, no-code build with automations	Enterprise integration and governance within Microsoft stack	UX and app presentation; quick deployment
Key Weakness	UI customization limits; per-user scaling costs; complexity ceiling	Can become complex and costly with Dataverse/governance; licensing complexity	Can get expensive at scale; some users raise privacy/model concerns