Asilla

Name: Asilla
Brand: Asilla

Technology Driven Future

Est 2015|Valuation $52.6M|Raised $11.6M|2 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 7K|FTEs 72|HQ Machida, Tokyo Metropolis, JP

MarketsPhysical Security Systems

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Compared with platform vendors (Genetec/Avigilon/Milestone): Asilla is positioned as a specialized behavior-recognition analytics capability that can be integrated with existing camera/VMS setups. Platform vendors may be preferred when procurement seeks a single, unified security stack with vendor-managed governance. - Compared with analytics specialists (BriefCam and similar): Asilla's anomaly-focused approach is a point of differentiation, but vendor materials do not provide benchmarking data that would enable an objective performance comparison. - Compared with North American VSaaS/AI camera providers (Spot AI): Some competitors surface standardized compliance claims publicly, which can simplify enterprise onboarding in certain jurisdictions. Asilla's public documentation on certifications is lighter and may require additional diligence.

Adoption / market presence signals

Partner disclosures and vendor materials indicate pilot activity and partner-led deployments. Buyers should seek customer references and clarify whether reported installations are pilots or production deployments.

	Asilla (AI Security asilla)	Genetec Security Center SaaS	Spot AI
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based); vendor marketing referenced an "implementation cost 0" offer in some campaigns	Public list pricing: video connections with listed per-connection subscriptions (varies by plan)	Pricing is quote-based; vendor documentation highlights compliance features but does not present a simple per-camera public price
Typical fit	Facilities seeking behavior/anomaly detection applied to existing camera feeds; channel-focused deployments in Japan and selected markets	Organizations needing a unified security platform (video, access, intrusion) with hybrid/cloud options and published pricing tiers	Organizations seeking an AI camera system and operational analytics with compliance documentation in North America
Key characteristics	Behavior/anomaly detection framing; local network deployment options; claims about per-server camera capacity	Broad platform and ecosystem; structured subscription offerings	AI camera and analytics provider with public compliance claims
Key weaknesses / procurement considerations	Limited transparent pricing; limited presence in major public review platforms; standardized certifications not clearly surfaced publicly	Complexity and integration costs typical of large enterprise platforms	Pricing and deployment options may vary by package; may be more cloud-centric depending on configuration

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Compared with platform vendors (Genetec/Avigilon/Milestone): Asilla is positioned as a specialized behavior-recognition analytics capability that can be integrated with existing camera/VMS setups. Platform vendors may be preferred when procurement seeks a single, unified security stack with vendor-managed governance.
Compared with analytics specialists (BriefCam and similar): Asilla's anomaly-focused approach is a point of differentiation, but vendor materials do not provide benchmarking data that would enable an objective performance comparison.
Compared with North American VSaaS/AI camera providers (Spot AI): Some competitors surface standardized compliance claims publicly, which can simplify enterprise onboarding in certain jurisdictions. Asilla's public documentation on certifications is lighter and may require additional diligence.

Adoption / market presence signals

Partner disclosures and vendor materials indicate pilot activity and partner-led deployments. Buyers should seek customer references and clarify whether reported installations are pilots or production deployments.

	Asilla (AI Security asilla)	Genetec Security Center SaaS	Spot AI
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based); vendor marketing referenced an "implementation cost 0" offer in some campaigns	Public list pricing: video connections with listed per-connection subscriptions (varies by plan)	Pricing is quote-based; vendor documentation highlights compliance features but does not present a simple per-camera public price
Typical fit	Facilities seeking behavior/anomaly detection applied to existing camera feeds; channel-focused deployments in Japan and selected markets	Organizations needing a unified security platform (video, access, intrusion) with hybrid/cloud options and published pricing tiers	Organizations seeking an AI camera system and operational analytics with compliance documentation in North America
Key characteristics	Behavior/anomaly detection framing; local network deployment options; claims about per-server camera capacity	Broad platform and ecosystem; structured subscription offerings	AI camera and analytics provider with public compliance claims
Key weaknesses / procurement considerations	Limited transparent pricing; limited presence in major public review platforms; standardized certifications not clearly surfaced publicly	Complexity and integration costs typical of large enterprise platforms	Pricing and deployment options may vary by package; may be more cloud-centric depending on configuration