Astelia

Name: Astelia
Brand: Astelia

AI Native

Astelia is the only platform that reveals true vulnerability exposure through reachability analysis.

Est 2024|Valuation $113M|Raised $35M|6 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6K|Web traffic 18K|FTEs 53|HQ New York, NY

MarketsVulnerability Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Astelia vs traditional VM (Tenable/Qualys/Rapid7): Astelia emphasizes contextual validation (reachability and exploit requirements) and attack-path visualization rather than scanning volume and severity scoring alone. Traditional VM vendors continue to add prioritization and contextual features. - Astelia vs cloud CNAPP (Wiz): Wiz is a cloud-focused platform with broad posture management capabilities. Astelia’s positioning focuses on hybrid reachability and contextual exposure assessment; overlap depends on whether the buyer’s primary exposure issues are cloud misconfigurations/identity or internal network reachability. - Astelia vs attack-path specialists (XM Cyber): Both offer attack-path analysis; differentiation depends on data source integrations, modeling depth, usability, and remediation workflow support.

Competitive selection dynamics (what to validate)

Prospective evaluators should validate the following in a proof-of-value or pilot:

Accuracy of reachability classification
Breadth and depth of integrations (network devices, EDR, scanners, cloud providers)
Workflow fit with ticketing systems (ServiceNow/Jira), reporting, and governance requirements

	Astelia	Wiz	XM Cyber
Starting Price	Not publicly posted; marketplace listings indicate private offers	Quote-based (publicly requires vendor contact)	Often quote-based; some public procurement listings show context-specific pricing
Best For	Hybrid/on-prem+cloud organizations needing reachability-driven prioritization and attack-path context	Cloud-first organizations needing broad CNAPP capabilities	Organizations focused on attack path management and exposure validation
Key Strength	Emphasis on reachability and exploit-requirement analysis plus remediation guidance beyond patching	Broad cloud posture and configuration risk coverage in cloud-native environments	Attack-path management with emphasis on exposure validation
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews and community footprint; early-stage maturity risk	Cloud-centric focus may not address deep on-prem reachability without additional tooling	Integration and data maturity requirements; channel-dependent pricing models

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Astelia vs traditional VM (Tenable/Qualys/Rapid7): Astelia emphasizes contextual validation (reachability and exploit requirements) and attack-path visualization rather than scanning volume and severity scoring alone. Traditional VM vendors continue to add prioritization and contextual features.
Astelia vs cloud CNAPP (Wiz): Wiz is a cloud-focused platform with broad posture management capabilities. Astelia’s positioning focuses on hybrid reachability and contextual exposure assessment; overlap depends on whether the buyer’s primary exposure issues are cloud misconfigurations/identity or internal network reachability.
Astelia vs attack-path specialists (XM Cyber): Both offer attack-path analysis; differentiation depends on data source integrations, modeling depth, usability, and remediation workflow support.

Competitive selection dynamics (what to validate)

Prospective evaluators should validate the following in a proof-of-value or pilot:

Accuracy of reachability classification
Breadth and depth of integrations (network devices, EDR, scanners, cloud providers)
Workflow fit with ticketing systems (ServiceNow/Jira), reporting, and governance requirements

	Astelia	Wiz	XM Cyber
Starting Price	Not publicly posted; marketplace listings indicate private offers	Quote-based (publicly requires vendor contact)	Often quote-based; some public procurement listings show context-specific pricing
Best For	Hybrid/on-prem+cloud organizations needing reachability-driven prioritization and attack-path context	Cloud-first organizations needing broad CNAPP capabilities	Organizations focused on attack path management and exposure validation
Key Strength	Emphasis on reachability and exploit-requirement analysis plus remediation guidance beyond patching	Broad cloud posture and configuration risk coverage in cloud-native environments	Attack-path management with emphasis on exposure validation
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews and community footprint; early-stage maturity risk	Cloud-centric focus may not address deep on-prem reachability without additional tooling	Integration and data maturity requirements; channel-dependent pricing models