Auditive

Name: Auditive
Brand: Auditive

AI Native

Connecting vendors and their customers for easy and continuous third-party risk management.

Est 2023|3 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 260|Website|FTEs 10|HQ Walnut Creek, California, US

MarketsSupplier Relationship Management (SRM) and Vendor Management (VRM)Vendor Risk Management

Published Oct 12, 2026

01Common complaints

Highly regulated contexts where procurement gates require public SOC 2/ISO attestations and documented control evidence before vendor selection; public documentation for those attestations was not found in the accessible sources.
Very large enterprises with thousands of suppliers and complex hierarchical supplier-management requirements where enterprise GRC suites are commonly deployed.
Buyers whose primary need is a trust center with document-sharing, clickwrap NDAs, and clearly published enterprise SSO/SCIM features; dedicated trust-center vendors may provide clearer feature disclosures for that use case.
Organizations that require extensive independent peer validation and a large set of public customer references prior to purchase.

- Highly regulated contexts where procurement gates require public SOC 2/ISO attestations and documented control evidence before vendor selection; public documentation for those attestations was not found in the accessible sources. - Very large enterprises with thousands of suppliers and complex hierarchical supplier-management requirements where enterprise GRC suites are commonly deployed. - Buyers whose primary need is a trust center with document-sharing, clickwrap NDAs, and clearly published enterprise SSO/SCIM features; dedicated trust-center vendors may provide clearer feature disclosures for that use case. - Organizations that require extensive independent peer validation and a large set of public customer references prior to purchase.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require publicly documented SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certification from vendors as a procurement gate (such attestations were not identified in reviewed vendor materials).
Very large enterprises with extensive supplier bases and complex control mappings that typically require broad GRC suites and established supplier-mapping capabilities.
Buyers that require extensive, widely published independent peer reviews and referenceable customer case studies before engaging.

- Organizations that require publicly documented SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certification from vendors as a procurement gate (such attestations were not identified in reviewed vendor materials). - Very large enterprises with extensive supplier bases and complex control mappings that typically require broad GRC suites and established supplier-mapping capabilities. - Buyers that require extensive, widely published independent peer reviews and referenceable customer case studies before engaging.

Limitations evidenced in this research

No publicly documented vendor security or compliance attestations located in the accessible sources.
A limited independent review footprint on major peer-review platforms in the captured results, creating referenceability and confidence gaps for some buyers.

Roadmap and future features

No explicit public product roadmap was found in the accessible sources for this review.

Churn reasons

No reliable public narratives explaining customer churn for the vendor were found in the accessible third-party sources reviewed.

02Why they buy

Distinguishing characteristics (observed in vendor materials)

Explicit per-supplier pricing and a stated free entry tier, which facilitates trial or small-scale adoption.
Vendor positioning around AI-driven automation for supplier risk assessment and ongoing monitoring.
A vendor-described network concept for sharing supplier posture between vendors and buyers.

Where competitors may have advantages (observed)

Trust-center vendors often provide clearer public disclosures of document-sharing features and enterprise security integrations.
Large enterprise suites offer broader governance modules that large organizations may require.
Some competitors package assessment workflows in ways that suggest mature operationalization around assessment units.

03Field reports

Important limitation: limited independent third-party reviews found

Gartner Peer Insights

Searches did not surface an accessible vendor profile with customer review quotes in the retrieved results for this review.

Status: attempted; vendor-specific Gartner Peer Insights reviews were not located in the accessible results.

G2

A product listing for the vendor exists on G2; pricing information was accessible via that listing in the research set, but specific peer review text was not retrieved in the results available to this review.

Status: listing located; vendor-specific review text was not captured.

TrustRadius

A dedicated TrustRadius product page for the vendor was not found in the accessible results for this review.

Status: attempted; not found in the captured results.

Non-standard "review" site (low confidence)

A site that appears to aggregate coupon codes and related content displayed a vendor entry and ratings counts; that site does not read like an authoritative enterprise B2B review source and should be treated cautiously for procurement decisions.

Practical note: Treat non-standard, coupon-oriented, or low-signal review sources with low confidence compared with enterprise peer-review platforms.

Public, authoritative third-party review volume (e.g., on major B2B review platforms) for the vendor was limited in the accessible sources for this review. Some review platform listings exist, but detailed review content and substantive, verifiable customer quotes from independent platforms were not captured in the source set used here. #### Gartner Peer Insights Searches did not surface an accessible vendor profile with customer review quotes in the retrieved results for this review. Status: attempted; vendor-specific Gartner Peer Insights reviews were not located in the accessible results. #### G2 A product listing for the vendor exists on G2; pricing information was accessible via that listing in the research set, but specific peer review text was not retrieved in the results available to this review. Status: listing located; vendor-specific review text was not captured. #### TrustRadius A dedicated TrustRadius product page for the vendor was not found in the accessible results for this review. Status: attempted; not found in the captured results. #### Non-standard "review" site (low confidence) A site that appears to aggregate coupon codes and related content displayed a vendor entry and ratings counts; that site does not read like an authoritative enterprise B2B review source and should be treated cautiously for procurement decisions. Practical note: Treat non-standard, coupon-oriented, or low-signal review sources with low confidence compared with enterprise peer-review platforms.

Vendor-published testimonials (curated)

The vendor website includes vendor-curated customer testimonials attributed to named organizations, for example:

Checkr (Senior Technology Compliance Analyst): claims tasks that previously took hours can now complete in a matter of minutes.
NextEra Energy (Information Security Manager): used language about changing the nature of vendor security reviews toward vendor relationships.
PayNearMe (Sales Operations Specialist): describes improved process and customer feedback.

Critical note: These testimonials are vendor-selected and are useful for understanding vendor positioning; they are not independent validations and may not represent typical customer experiences.

The vendor website includes vendor-curated customer testimonials attributed to named organizations, for example: - Checkr (Senior Technology Compliance Analyst): claims tasks that previously took hours can now complete in a matter of minutes. - NextEra Energy (Information Security Manager): used language about changing the nature of vendor security reviews toward vendor relationships. - PayNearMe (Sales Operations Specialist): describes improved process and customer feedback. Critical note: These testimonials are vendor-selected and are useful for understanding vendor positioning; they are not independent validations and may not represent typical customer experiences.

Community and social discussion (limited signal)

A small discussion thread on a community forum described the vendor as an AI-powered platform that facilitates third-party risk management; the post reads more like a product highlight than a detailed, hands-on customer review.

Common criticisms and complaints

Because credible third-party review volume for the vendor was not found in the accessible sources, there is insufficient evidence to quantify recurring vendor-specific complaints (support responsiveness, product stability, etc.). To support diligence, buyers should consider common complaint themes from adjacent tools in the TPRM/GRC category, such as pricing changes and support issues among some large-suite vendors; those comments are not specific to this vendor and should be treated as contextual market observations.

Stated reasons customers selected the vendor (vendor material)

Vendor testimonials and positioning indicate reasons include:

Reduced time required for vendor reviews and questionnaire completion.
Continuous monitoring capabilities rather than strictly point-in-time questionnaires.

Available case-study style evidence

The vendor site includes customer quotes attributed to organizations such as Checkr, NextEra Energy, and PayNearMe. These items are presented as short testimonials rather than structured case studies with methodology, baselines, or independent verification.

Critical evaluation

Metrics and performance statements in vendor materials (e.g., time-to-complete figures and relative speed multipliers) are vendor-published and do not include disclosed baselines, sample sizes, or measurement methods in the materials reviewed.
No independent TEI/ROI analyst study for the vendor was identified in the accessible sources.

04Best fit

Company sizes (practical estimate)

Based on the pricing model and public indications of company maturity, the vendor appears most suited to:

Small and mid-market organizations with a meaningful supplier base (for example, organizations in the small-to-midsize enterprise range) that seek to adopt automation for vendor onboarding and ongoing monitoring.
Organizations that can tolerate working with an early-stage vendor and that plan to validate security and compliance through contractual and questionnaire evidence rather than relying only on published vendor attestations.

Based on the pricing model and public indications of company maturity, the vendor appears most suited to: - Small and mid-market organizations with a meaningful supplier base (for example, organizations in the small-to-midsize enterprise range) that seek to adopt automation for vendor onboarding and ongoing monitoring. - Organizations that can tolerate working with an early-stage vendor and that plan to validate security and compliance through contractual and questionnaire evidence rather than relying only on published vendor attestations.

Industries and verticals

Financial services organizations are explicitly referenced in some vendor event materials, suggesting potential applicability in that vertical.
Use cases are broadly applicable across industries that require vendor onboarding and supplier risk management.

Roles and personas

Procurement and vendor-management leaders,
Security and GRC teams conducting vendor security assessments,
Compliance and privacy analysts involved in third-party risk oversight.

Qualification criteria (good fit)

Organizations with repetitive vendor questionnaires that seek automation,
Programs that benefit from monitoring vendor posture continuously rather than relying on annual reviews,
Teams willing to engage with a newer vendor and validate controls through questionnaires and references where public attestations are not available.

05The pitch

What the product does (objective value proposition)

Primary capabilities described by the vendor include:

Risk Assessment Agent: autonomous assessments of suppliers against custom controls.
Supplier intake acceleration: reduced time-to-awareness and onboarding workflow features.
Continuous supply chain monitoring: ongoing monitoring rather than point-in-time procurement review.
Supplier-side features: vendor-described "Dynamic Trust Profiles," a questionnaire assistant, and AI-generated trust-profile construction.

Auditive describes itself as an AI-agent-based third-party and supplier risk management platform focused on procurement, vendor onboarding, and ongoing monitoring across the vendor lifecycle. Vendor statements indicate capabilities for automating risk assessments against custom controls, reducing supplier intake time, and providing continuous monitoring of third- and "nth-party" risk with incident alerts. The vendor also describes a "Trust Profile" for suppliers to share security posture with customers. (Vendor claims.) Primary capabilities described by the vendor include: - Risk Assessment Agent: autonomous assessments of suppliers against custom controls. - Supplier intake acceleration: reduced time-to-awareness and onboarding workflow features. - Continuous supply chain monitoring: ongoing monitoring rather than point-in-time procurement review. - Supplier-side features: vendor-described "Dynamic Trust Profiles," a questionnaire assistant, and AI-generated trust-profile construction.

Target market and market positioning

Auditive's marketing language targets:

Procurement and vendor management teams responsible for third-party risk management (TPRM) and supplier onboarding automation.
Security and governance, risk & compliance (GRC) teams that perform vendor security reviews and questionnaire workflows (implied by the vendor's references to SOC 2, ISO, and GDPR frameworks in its content).
Financial services organizations are specifically referenced in some third-party event materials.

In vendor materials, the product is positioned as an AI-driven supplier risk management solution with a network or marketplace concept intended to reduce repetitive vendor assessments between customers and suppliers.

Auditive's marketing language targets: - Procurement and vendor management teams responsible for third-party risk management (TPRM) and supplier onboarding automation. - Security and governance, risk & compliance (GRC) teams that perform vendor security reviews and questionnaire workflows (implied by the vendor's references to SOC 2, ISO, and GDPR frameworks in its content). - Financial services organizations are specifically referenced in some third-party event materials. In vendor materials, the product is positioned as an AI-driven supplier risk management solution with a network or marketplace concept intended to reduce repetitive vendor assessments between customers and suppliers.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Auditive including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →