Augtera Networks

Name: Augtera Networks
Brand: Augtera Networks

The First Network AI For The Modern Enterprise

Est 2016|Valuation $48M|Raised $17M|2 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 3K|Website|FTEs 4|HQ Palo Alto, California, US

MarketsSecurity Information and Event Management (SIEM)Infrastructure Monitoring Enterprise Networking Observability Platform

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Augtera and ThousandEyes address different primary pain points: ThousandEyes is often selected for end-to-end path and user-experience visibility (Internet, SaaS, WAN), while Augtera historically emphasized incident detection and correlation across network devices and logs. They can be complementary depending on use case. - Arista CloudVision is most relevant when network operations are centered on Arista switching; Augtera’s approach was more vendor-agnostic and analytics-focused. - Kentik provides published starting prices that can make budgeting and early piloting easier for buyers who require transparent entry points.

Market share / adoption trends

No authoritative public market-share metrics were found in the reviewed sources. The reported acquisition by a large networking/AI company is a notable strategic signal for AI networking efforts.

	Augtera Networks (platform)	Cisco ThousandEyes	Arista CloudVision
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (enterprise quote-based)	Annual subscription; Cisco provides pricing/ordering guidance	Reseller listings show subscription pricing; pricing signals vary by reseller/vendor
Best For	NOCs/NetOps needing ML-based anomaly detection and topology correlation across multi-vendor networks (historical positioning)	Internet/WAN visibility, endpoint experience, synthetic monitoring, external dependency monitoring	Arista-centric environments seeking telemetry/automation and lifecycle workflows
Key Strength	Emphasis on log analysis combined with metrics and topology-aware correlation; on-prem deployment option referenced	Global probe/agent network and digital experience monitoring; clear ordering constructs	Deep integration with Arista hardware and automation workflows
Key Weakness	Post-acquisition uncertainty; limited public reviews; pricing not transparent	Can be complex and costly at scale; focused primarily on external and WAN visibility rather than in-depth NOC correlation	Most compelling when standardizing on Arista hardware; may be less compelling in heterogeneous environments

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Augtera and ThousandEyes address different primary pain points: ThousandEyes is often selected for end-to-end path and user-experience visibility (Internet, SaaS, WAN), while Augtera historically emphasized incident detection and correlation across network devices and logs. They can be complementary depending on use case.
Arista CloudVision is most relevant when network operations are centered on Arista switching; Augtera’s approach was more vendor-agnostic and analytics-focused.
Kentik provides published starting prices that can make budgeting and early piloting easier for buyers who require transparent entry points.

Market share / adoption trends

No authoritative public market-share metrics were found in the reviewed sources. The reported acquisition by a large networking/AI company is a notable strategic signal for AI networking efforts.

	Augtera Networks (platform)	Cisco ThousandEyes	Arista CloudVision
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (enterprise quote-based)	Annual subscription; Cisco provides pricing/ordering guidance	Reseller listings show subscription pricing; pricing signals vary by reseller/vendor
Best For	NOCs/NetOps needing ML-based anomaly detection and topology correlation across multi-vendor networks (historical positioning)	Internet/WAN visibility, endpoint experience, synthetic monitoring, external dependency monitoring	Arista-centric environments seeking telemetry/automation and lifecycle workflows
Key Strength	Emphasis on log analysis combined with metrics and topology-aware correlation; on-prem deployment option referenced	Global probe/agent network and digital experience monitoring; clear ordering constructs	Deep integration with Arista hardware and automation workflows
Key Weakness	Post-acquisition uncertainty; limited public reviews; pricing not transparent	Can be complex and costly at scale; focused primarily on external and WAN visibility rather than in-depth NOC correlation	Most compelling when standardizing on Arista hardware; may be less compelling in heterogeneous environments