August

Name: August
Brand: August

AI Native

Gender-Inclusive, Sustainable, Ultra-Comfy Period Care🩸

Est 2020|Raised $5.7M|7 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6K|Website|Web traffic 37K|FTEs 37|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsContract Review Legal AI

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

#### Direct competitors and differentiators - **August vs Spellbook:** both integrate with Microsoft Word; August emphasizes collaborative configuration to align outputs with firm precedents, while Spellbook emphasizes standardized playbooks and Word-native contracting workflows. - **August vs CoCounsel:** CoCounsel's differentiator is its integration with a large legal-content ecosystem; August emphasizes configuration for midsize-firm workflows and deployment options. - **August vs Luminance:** Luminance positions itself as a platform for contract lifecycle touchpoints and analysis; its procurement process and pricing models are generally demo-based and often oriented toward enterprise customers. #### Pricing comparison (value proposition vs alternatives) - August publishes an individual price point, which is comparatively transparent relative to many enterprise legal-AI competitors that provide quote-based pricing for teams. - Spellbook provides some public pricing information but routes team and enterprise inquiries to sales. - CoCounsel pricing is often tied to product bundles and procurement arrangements; exact per-seat pricing should be confirmed with the vendor. #### Market adoption trends (limited independent evidence) - The vendor cites a growing user base and references customers in press materials, but independent verification or a comprehensive customer list was not available in the resources reviewed.

	August (august.law)	Spellbook	CoCounsel (Thomson Reuters)
Starting Price	Public individual price point in the hundreds per user per month; teams quoted via sales	Custom for teams; public page does not show a simple per-seat number	Public pricing varies by package; trial available; enterprise bundles and procurement arrangements are common
Typical Fit	Midsize firms seeking configurable, firm-specific workflows and Word/Outlook integration	Transactional teams seeking Word-integrated drafting/review and playbooks	Firms using Thomson Reuters content and seeking integrated research and drafting workflows
Key Characteristics	Collaborative configuration services, Word/Outlook integration, vendor-described data-residency options	Word-native contracting workflows and playbook capabilities	Integration with TR content ecosystem and established enterprise procurement channels
Known Weaknesses	Limited independent review footprint; pricing may be a barrier; outcomes depend on implementation effort	Pricing and enterprise features may require direct engagement; positioning skews transactional	Pricing and bundling complexity; procurement processes may be formal and time-consuming

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Direct competitors and differentiators

August vs Spellbook: both integrate with Microsoft Word; August emphasizes collaborative configuration to align outputs with firm precedents, while Spellbook emphasizes standardized playbooks and Word-native contracting workflows.
August vs CoCounsel: CoCounsel's differentiator is its integration with a large legal-content ecosystem; August emphasizes configuration for midsize-firm workflows and deployment options.
August vs Luminance: Luminance positions itself as a platform for contract lifecycle touchpoints and analysis; its procurement process and pricing models are generally demo-based and often oriented toward enterprise customers.

Pricing comparison (value proposition vs alternatives)

August publishes an individual price point, which is comparatively transparent relative to many enterprise legal-AI competitors that provide quote-based pricing for teams.
Spellbook provides some public pricing information but routes team and enterprise inquiries to sales.
CoCounsel pricing is often tied to product bundles and procurement arrangements; exact per-seat pricing should be confirmed with the vendor.

Market adoption trends (limited independent evidence)

The vendor cites a growing user base and references customers in press materials, but independent verification or a comprehensive customer list was not available in the resources reviewed.

	August (august.law)	Spellbook	CoCounsel (Thomson Reuters)
Starting Price	Public individual price point in the hundreds per user per month; teams quoted via sales	Custom for teams; public page does not show a simple per-seat number	Public pricing varies by package; trial available; enterprise bundles and procurement arrangements are common
Typical Fit	Midsize firms seeking configurable, firm-specific workflows and Word/Outlook integration	Transactional teams seeking Word-integrated drafting/review and playbooks	Firms using Thomson Reuters content and seeking integrated research and drafting workflows
Key Characteristics	Collaborative configuration services, Word/Outlook integration, vendor-described data-residency options	Word-native contracting workflows and playbook capabilities	Integration with TR content ecosystem and established enterprise procurement channels
Known Weaknesses	Limited independent review footprint; pricing may be a barrier; outcomes depend on implementation effort	Pricing and enterprise features may require direct engagement; positioning skews transactional	Pricing and bundling complexity; procurement processes may be formal and time-consuming