Avoma

Name: Avoma
Brand: Avoma
Rating: 4.6 (1377 reviews)

An all-in-won AI Meeting Assistant with Conversation and Revenue Intelligence

Est 2017|Valuation $52M|Raised $18.2M|28 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 44K|Website|Web traffic 97K|FTEs 60

MarketsConversation Intelligence Rep Coaching Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Versus Gong: Avoma competes on transparent public pricing and modular packaging that can consolidate multiple point tools. Gong often has more mature enterprise analytics and may be selected by customers prioritizing large-scale revenue intelligence and established enterprise controls. Comparison pages indicate both receive strong ratings, with differences by feature maturity and customer scale. - Versus Fireflies: Fireflies provides low-cost entry and simple adoption for transcription and summaries. Avoma serves as an option for teams that require CRM automation, coaching, and deal/pipeline signals beyond simple note-taking. - Versus Otter/Fathom: these tools are relevant for individuals or teams primarily needing transcription and summaries with simpler workflows.

Market adoption / trends (evidence-based constraints)

Significant review volume on major review platforms suggests notable market penetration.
Independent market share numbers were not available in the reviewed sources.

	Avoma	Fireflies.ai	Gong
Starting Price	Public per-user entry tier with add-on modules	Public low-cost entry tiers and a freemium option	Quote-based enterprise pricing
Best For	Revenue teams seeking integrated meeting, conversation, and revenue workflows with modular adoption options	Teams needing meeting transcription/summaries with low-cost entry points	Larger mid-market/enterprise needing mature revenue intelligence and in-depth conversation analytics
Key Strength	Modular suite covering meeting capture, scheduling/lead routing, coaching, and pipeline signals; CRM workflow emphasis	Low-cost tiers for broad transcription/summaries; accessible entry-level offering	Mature enterprise analytics and revenue workflow capabilities; established in larger deployments
Key Weakness	Meeting bot reliability reports; variable support experiences; may exceed needs for simple note-taking use cases	Lacks deep revenue intelligence and enterprise coaching features in some tiers	Higher total cost and typically quote-based pricing; longer implementation for large deployments

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Versus Gong: Avoma competes on transparent public pricing and modular packaging that can consolidate multiple point tools. Gong often has more mature enterprise analytics and may be selected by customers prioritizing large-scale revenue intelligence and established enterprise controls. Comparison pages indicate both receive strong ratings, with differences by feature maturity and customer scale.
Versus Fireflies: Fireflies provides low-cost entry and simple adoption for transcription and summaries. Avoma serves as an option for teams that require CRM automation, coaching, and deal/pipeline signals beyond simple note-taking.
Versus Otter/Fathom: these tools are relevant for individuals or teams primarily needing transcription and summaries with simpler workflows.

Market adoption / trends (evidence-based constraints)

Significant review volume on major review platforms suggests notable market penetration.
Independent market share numbers were not available in the reviewed sources.

	Avoma	Fireflies.ai	Gong
Starting Price	Public per-user entry tier with add-on modules	Public low-cost entry tiers and a freemium option	Quote-based enterprise pricing
Best For	Revenue teams seeking integrated meeting, conversation, and revenue workflows with modular adoption options	Teams needing meeting transcription/summaries with low-cost entry points	Larger mid-market/enterprise needing mature revenue intelligence and in-depth conversation analytics
Key Strength	Modular suite covering meeting capture, scheduling/lead routing, coaching, and pipeline signals; CRM workflow emphasis	Low-cost tiers for broad transcription/summaries; accessible entry-level offering	Mature enterprise analytics and revenue workflow capabilities; established in larger deployments
Key Weakness	Meeting bot reliability reports; variable support experiences; may exceed needs for simple note-taking use cases	Lacks deep revenue intelligence and enterprise coaching features in some tiers	Higher total cost and typically quote-based pricing; longer implementation for large deployments