Amazon VPC

Name: Amazon VPC
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 4.5 (426 reviews)

Leader

Official Global LinkedIn page for Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Est 2006|Valuation $2560B|15 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10.9M|Website|Web traffic 1.1M|FTEs 148,001|HQ Seattle, Washington, US

MarketsSecurity Service Edge (SSE)Cloud Infrastructure Providers (IaaS/PaaS)Enterprise Networking Cloud Infrastructure Providers (IaaS/PaaS)

Platform CoversFirewalls Network Detection & Response (NDR)Infrastructure Monitoring

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Pricing & what is included: - Azure VNet: Virtual Network is generally provided without a base fee; published usage charges apply for peering traffic and gateway features. - Google Cloud VPC: Google publishes detailed networking pricing with per-unit data transfer and telemetry/logging charges described. - AWS VPC: VPC itself is generally available without a base fee but many components are billed; newer features can introduce additional per-VPC usage charges. Feature/architecture differences that matter in practice: - Large AWS deployments commonly adopt a hub-and-spoke architecture with Transit Gateway or Cloud WAN to address non-transitive peering limitations. This approach influences operational complexity and overall vendor billing. - Google Cloud’s global VPC model (regional subnets within a global VPC) presents a different tradeoff compared with AWS’s regional VPC model, affecting governance and segmentation strategies. When customers choose competitors instead: - Organizations already standardized on Microsoft identity and governance frequently choose Azure for tighter integration with existing enterprise controls. - Buyers seeking more explicit, centralized networking pricing and different private connectivity constructs may prefer Google Cloud.

	Amazon VPC	Microsoft Azure Virtual Network (VNet)	Google Cloud VPC
Starting Price	VPC itself: generally no additional charge; many components are metered. Certain advanced features can introduce published per-VPC usage charges when enabled.	VNet itself is generally available without a base fee; peering and gateway functionality incur published usage charges.	VPC network itself generally does not have a bundled per-VPC charge; data transfer and add-on services (NAT, logging, etc.) drive published usage costs.
Best For	Organizations using AWS requiring deep integration with AWS services and ecosystem tools.	Organizations standardized on Microsoft technologies and Azure governance models.	Organizations that prioritize Google Cloud network architecture and pricing models.
Key Strength	Integration with AWS services and a rich ecosystem of adjacent networking services.	Integration with Azure governance and enterprise tooling.	Global network architecture and explicit networking pricing tables.
Key Weakness	Operational complexity and potential cost surprises from components (NAT/endpoints/logging); scaling across accounts/VPCs often requires additional tooling (Transit Gateway/Cloud WAN).	Networking SKU complexity and gateway costs can present challenges.	Different architecture model (global VPC) that changes governance/segmentation tradeoffs and requires different operational skills.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Pricing & what is included:

Azure VNet: Virtual Network is generally provided without a base fee; published usage charges apply for peering traffic and gateway features.
Google Cloud VPC: Google publishes detailed networking pricing with per-unit data transfer and telemetry/logging charges described.
AWS VPC: VPC itself is generally available without a base fee but many components are billed; newer features can introduce additional per-VPC usage charges.

Feature/architecture differences that matter in practice:

Large AWS deployments commonly adopt a hub-and-spoke architecture with Transit Gateway or Cloud WAN to address non-transitive peering limitations. This approach influences operational complexity and overall vendor billing.
Google Cloud’s global VPC model (regional subnets within a global VPC) presents a different tradeoff compared with AWS’s regional VPC model, affecting governance and segmentation strategies.

When customers choose competitors instead:

Organizations already standardized on Microsoft identity and governance frequently choose Azure for tighter integration with existing enterprise controls.
Buyers seeking more explicit, centralized networking pricing and different private connectivity constructs may prefer Google Cloud.

	Amazon VPC	Microsoft Azure Virtual Network (VNet)	Google Cloud VPC
Starting Price	VPC itself: generally no additional charge; many components are metered. Certain advanced features can introduce published per-VPC usage charges when enabled.	VNet itself is generally available without a base fee; peering and gateway functionality incur published usage charges.	VPC network itself generally does not have a bundled per-VPC charge; data transfer and add-on services (NAT, logging, etc.) drive published usage costs.
Best For	Organizations using AWS requiring deep integration with AWS services and ecosystem tools.	Organizations standardized on Microsoft technologies and Azure governance models.	Organizations that prioritize Google Cloud network architecture and pricing models.
Key Strength	Integration with AWS services and a rich ecosystem of adjacent networking services.	Integration with Azure governance and enterprise tooling.	Global network architecture and explicit networking pricing tables.
Key Weakness	Operational complexity and potential cost surprises from components (NAT/endpoints/logging); scaling across accounts/VPCs often requires additional tooling (Transit Gateway/Cloud WAN).	Networking SKU complexity and gateway costs can present challenges.	Different architecture model (global VPC) that changes governance/segmentation tradeoffs and requires different operational skills.