AWS CloudHSM

Name: AWS CloudHSM
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 4.3 (14 reviews)

Leader

Official Global LinkedIn page for Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Est 2006|Valuation $2560B|2 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10.9M|Website|Web traffic 1.1M|FTEs 148,001|HQ Seattle, Washington, US

MarketsCloud Infrastructure Providers (IaaS/PaaS)

Platform CoversData Security Platforms Secrets Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

AWS CloudHSM vs AWS KMS: AWS KMS has evolved and obtained FIPS certifications for its HSMs, narrowing some historical compliance distinctions. KMS remains a managed service with different control boundaries; CloudHSM is selected when direct HSM control or single-tenant HSMs are required.
AWS CloudHSM vs Azure Dedicated HSM: Both offer single-tenant hardware options; Azure’s offering references Thales Luna hardware and sales-quoted pricing, while CloudHSM is integrated into AWS VPC patterns.
AWS CloudHSM vs Entrust nShield as a Service: Entrust promotes cross-cloud interoperability and subscription-based HSM consumption; pricing models and regional availability differ and are not directly comparable without detailed workload and throughput requirements.

- AWS CloudHSM vs AWS KMS: AWS KMS has evolved and obtained FIPS certifications for its HSMs, narrowing some historical compliance distinctions. KMS remains a managed service with different control boundaries; CloudHSM is selected when direct HSM control or single-tenant HSMs are required. - AWS CloudHSM vs Azure Dedicated HSM: Both offer single-tenant hardware options; Azure’s offering references Thales Luna hardware and sales-quoted pricing, while CloudHSM is integrated into AWS VPC patterns. - AWS CloudHSM vs Entrust nShield as a Service: Entrust promotes cross-cloud interoperability and subscription-based HSM consumption; pricing models and regional availability differ and are not directly comparable without detailed workload and throughput requirements.

	AWS CloudHSM	Azure Dedicated HSM	Google Cloud KMS / Cloud HSM*
Starting Price	Published hourly pricing per provisioned HSM; regional rates vary	Quote-based — contact vendor for pricing	Published usage-based pricing for KMS; HSM-backed keys involve usage and key-version charges; some HSM offerings use flat monthly pricing
Best For	AWS-native applications requiring single-tenant HSM control in a VPC; PKI and signing workloads	Organizations requiring dedicated Thales Luna devices in Azure with vendor-specified hardware	Teams preferring a managed KMS API surface with HSM-backed keys and lower HSM operational overhead
Key Strength	Dedicated single-tenant HSMs with support for PKCS#11/JCE/CNG/OpenSSL integration	Dedicated hardware (Thales Luna) and enterprise procurement models	Unified KMS API experience and simplified developer integration
Key Weakness	Higher baseline cost and increased operational complexity; fewer examples for niche use cases	Limited integration with some cloud services per vendor guidance; sales-quoted pricing models	Less appliance-level control; may not satisfy customers requiring direct HSM administration