| Aspect | Azure Lighthouse | AWS Control Tower | Azure Arc |
|--------|------------------|-------------------|----------|
| Starting Price | No charge for the core service; customers pay for underlying Azure services and add-ons | No charge for the core service; customers pay for enabled AWS services and related consumption | Core control plane includes free components; paid add-ons and service usage drive costs |
| Best For | MSP/MSSP cross-tenant Azure resource management using delegated access | Multi-account AWS governance and landing zone orchestration on AWS Organizations | Extending Azure management to on-premises and multicloud servers/Kubernetes and enabling Azure management/security services |
| Key Strength | Delegated resource management across tenants; avoids creating provider admin accounts in customer tenants | Opinionated landing zone and governance baseline integrated with AWS Organizations | Broader hybrid/multicloud reach; brings non-Azure resources into the Azure management plane |
| Key Weakness | Not a complete organization-governance replacement; can be operationally heavy for monitoring/alerting at scale; depends on correct RBAC design | Can increase costs via enabled services and requires governance design choices | Can become costly when monitoring/security services are enabled broadly; not specifically a cross-tenant MSP delegation construct |
- Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives
- Azure Lighthouse: no charge for the core service; usage of paid services (for example, Log Analytics and Defender for Cloud) continues to drive costs.
- AWS Control Tower: no additional charge for the service itself; customers pay for enabled services and may see increased costs for configuration and logging.
- Azure Arc: core capabilities include free inventory and management features; paid add-ons such as guest configuration, Defender, and monitoring ingestion can dominate total cost of ownership.
- Feature comparison: where Azure Lighthouse excels vs lags
- Areas where Azure Lighthouse provides value
- Centralized cross-tenant visibility and a delegated access model for Azure resource management.
- Areas of concern or limitation
- Cross-tenant configuration management expectations (especially for SOC patterns) may require additional tooling or processes.
- Operationalizing monitoring and alerting at scale can be challenging without supplemental automation or third-party tooling.