Behavior Science Technology

Name: Behavior Science Technology
Brand: Behavior Science Technology
Rating: 4.1 (10 reviews)

Stop the turnover. Start measuring procedural integrity.

Est 2019|Valuation $4M|Raised $1.4M|1 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 5K|Website|FTEs 3|HQ Fort Lauderdale, Florida, US

01Competitive Landscape

Where BSTperform may be advantageous vs where it may be less suitable

Where BSTperform may be advantageous: - Narrow, specialized focus on procedural integrity/treatment fidelity measurement, which many general ABA EMRs do not prioritize as a primary quality KPI. - Published list pricing facilitates initial budget assessment for mid-market organizations. Where competitors may be stronger: - All-in-one workflows: CentralReach and RethinkBH aim to handle scheduling, billing, documentation, and data collection in a single platform; organizations seeking a single platform may prefer those vendors. - Review footprint & market awareness: larger vendors have a more substantial presence on third-party review platforms and broader market recognition. Market adoption signal: - BST’s acquisition by CentralReach indicates fidelity measurement is a strategic capability within the broader ABA software market.

	BSTperform (Behavior Science Technology)	CentralReach (Care360/EMR ecosystem)	RethinkBH
Starting Price	Published list pricing available for common organization sizes	Custom quote; pricing not publicly disclosed	Custom quote; pricing not publicly disclosed
Best For	ABA organizations prioritizing fidelity/procedural integrity measurement and QA dashboards	Larger organizations seeking an integrated EMR + practice management + billing solution	Providers seeking an integrated suite with clinical tools, scheduling, billing/RCM options
Key Strength	Focus on treatment fidelity and QA reporting; published list prices for common organization sizes	Broad end-to-end platform; established enterprise presence	Integrated clinical and practice management tools; content libraries and workflows for ABA
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews; public security/compliance details not prominent; integration specifics not transparent	Community feedback includes price and usability complaints; complex pricing and fees	Pricing not publicly posted; deployment usability varies

01Competitive Landscape

Where BSTperform may be advantageous vs where it may be less suitable

Where BSTperform may be advantageous:

Narrow, specialized focus on procedural integrity/treatment fidelity measurement, which many general ABA EMRs do not prioritize as a primary quality KPI.
Published list pricing facilitates initial budget assessment for mid-market organizations.

Where competitors may be stronger:

All-in-one workflows: CentralReach and RethinkBH aim to handle scheduling, billing, documentation, and data collection in a single platform; organizations seeking a single platform may prefer those vendors.
Review footprint & market awareness: larger vendors have a more substantial presence on third-party review platforms and broader market recognition.

Market adoption signal:

BST’s acquisition by CentralReach indicates fidelity measurement is a strategic capability within the broader ABA software market.

	BSTperform (Behavior Science Technology)	CentralReach (Care360/EMR ecosystem)	RethinkBH
Starting Price	Published list pricing available for common organization sizes	Custom quote; pricing not publicly disclosed	Custom quote; pricing not publicly disclosed
Best For	ABA organizations prioritizing fidelity/procedural integrity measurement and QA dashboards	Larger organizations seeking an integrated EMR + practice management + billing solution	Providers seeking an integrated suite with clinical tools, scheduling, billing/RCM options
Key Strength	Focus on treatment fidelity and QA reporting; published list prices for common organization sizes	Broad end-to-end platform; established enterprise presence	Integrated clinical and practice management tools; content libraries and workflows for ABA
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews; public security/compliance details not prominent; integration specifics not transparent	Community feedback includes price and usability complaints; complex pricing and fees	Pricing not publicly posted; deployment usability varies

Behavior Science Technology

01Competitive Landscape

Where BSTperform may be advantageous vs where it may be less suitable

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Where BSTperform may be advantageous vs where it may be less suitable

02Market Map