Boardable

Name: Boardable
Brand: Boardable

Boardable: Board management software built for nonprofits.

Est 2016|Valuation $37.4M|Raised $15M|18 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 5K|Web traffic 95K|FTEs 41|HQ Fishers, Indiana, US

MarketsBoard Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Boardable vs BoardEffect (Diligent): - **Pricing transparency:** Boardable publishes per-seat pricing; BoardEffect typically requires a custom quote. - **Nonprofit focus:** Both target nonprofit customers; BoardEffect emphasizes enterprise-style support while Boardable emphasizes simpler onboarding and self-service options. - **Mobile experience:** Community feedback indicates Boardable may have mobile optimization gaps for some boards; some incumbents emphasize director mobile/offline usability. Boardable vs Diligent Boards: - **Market segment:** Diligent Boards is positioned for public companies and large regulated enterprises; Boardable targets smaller nonprofit and SMB segments. - **Cost and implementation:** Diligent tends to be more expensive and heavier-weight; Boardable can be started with lower friction but may require internal governance design and adoption work. Boardable vs OnBoard: - OnBoard positions itself on enterprise-grade security and packaged governance features. OnBoard’s pricing is typically quote-based; buyers should benchmark total costs for director counts and required modules.

Adoption trends / market notes

Press coverage and market reporting indicate ongoing investor interest and continued product development in nonprofit technology and governance tooling.
Review activity on major platforms suggests meaningful adoption in the nonprofit segment, though Boardable is one of several vendors serving this market.

	Boardable	BoardEffect (Diligent)	Diligent Boards
Starting Price	Public per-user / per-seat pricing published on the vendor site	Pricing typically requires a quote (annual subscription; tiered by user counts)	Custom / enterprise pricing (quote-based for larger packages)
Best For	Nonprofits seeking straightforward governance workflows and transparent per-seat pricing	Mission-driven organizations wanting a nonprofit-focused portal with incumbent support expectations	Large enterprises/public companies needing deep governance and compliance capabilities
Key Strength	Usability and transparent per-seat pricing; core feature set (agendas, packets, tasks, discussions)	Established incumbent footprint; integrated service expectations; nonprofit packaging	Enterprise-grade security/compliance posture and breadth of GRC-adjacent capabilities
Key Weakness	Reported mobile optimization and reporting/export limitations; mixed feedback on integrated video	Pricing not public; may be heavier than needed for small organizations	Cost and complexity; can be overkill for most nonprofits

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Boardable vs BoardEffect (Diligent):

Pricing transparency: Boardable publishes per-seat pricing; BoardEffect typically requires a custom quote.
Nonprofit focus: Both target nonprofit customers; BoardEffect emphasizes enterprise-style support while Boardable emphasizes simpler onboarding and self-service options.
Mobile experience: Community feedback indicates Boardable may have mobile optimization gaps for some boards; some incumbents emphasize director mobile/offline usability.

Boardable vs Diligent Boards:

Market segment: Diligent Boards is positioned for public companies and large regulated enterprises; Boardable targets smaller nonprofit and SMB segments.
Cost and implementation: Diligent tends to be more expensive and heavier-weight; Boardable can be started with lower friction but may require internal governance design and adoption work.

Boardable vs OnBoard:

OnBoard positions itself on enterprise-grade security and packaged governance features. OnBoard’s pricing is typically quote-based; buyers should benchmark total costs for director counts and required modules.

Adoption trends / market notes

Press coverage and market reporting indicate ongoing investor interest and continued product development in nonprofit technology and governance tooling.
Review activity on major platforms suggests meaningful adoption in the nonprofit segment, though Boardable is one of several vendors serving this market.

	Boardable	BoardEffect (Diligent)	Diligent Boards
Starting Price	Public per-user / per-seat pricing published on the vendor site	Pricing typically requires a quote (annual subscription; tiered by user counts)	Custom / enterprise pricing (quote-based for larger packages)
Best For	Nonprofits seeking straightforward governance workflows and transparent per-seat pricing	Mission-driven organizations wanting a nonprofit-focused portal with incumbent support expectations	Large enterprises/public companies needing deep governance and compliance capabilities
Key Strength	Usability and transparent per-seat pricing; core feature set (agendas, packets, tasks, discussions)	Established incumbent footprint; integrated service expectations; nonprofit packaging	Enterprise-grade security/compliance posture and breadth of GRC-adjacent capabilities
Key Weakness	Reported mobile optimization and reporting/export limitations; mixed feedback on integrated video	Pricing not public; may be heavier than needed for small organizations	Cost and complexity; can be overkill for most nonprofits