Buildup

Name: Buildup
Brand: Buildup
Rating: 4.5 (47 reviews)

Construction and Renovation software for punch list, task management, and inspections.

Est 2015|Valuation $17.5M|Raised $8.9M|5 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 18|HQ Richmond, Virginia, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation: - Buildup: focused on punch lists, inspections, and closeout workflows with emphasis on field-oriented capture and export capabilities. - Fieldwire: selected for plan viewing, task management, and field coordination with transparent per-user licensing. - Procore: selected when buyers require an end-to-end platform covering RFIs, submittals, financials, and broader project controls. Pricing comparison and value perception: - Buildup Core has a publicly listed monthly price, while Buildup+ uses value-based pricing tied to construction value, which can complicate forecasting. - Fieldwire publishes transparent tiered pricing including a free entry option. - Procore uses customized pricing dependent on construction volume and selected modules. Market adoption and buyer behavior (directional): - Buildup's acquisition was noted as part of construction technology consolidation trends. - Some contractors seek lighter-weight tools than enterprise platforms for cost and fit reasons, creating demand for focused execution tools.

	Buildup	Fieldwire (Hilti)	Procore
Starting Price	Published monthly and annual per-seat pricing available from the vendor	Transparent per-user tiered pricing, including a free entry tier	Custom (depends on products and annual construction volume; not publicly itemized)
Best For	Teams prioritizing punch list, inspections, and closeout workflows; organizations that integrate with Procore/BIM 360	Field execution (plans + tasks + checklists) with transparent per-user pricing	Organizations seeking an end-to-end construction management platform across project and financial workflows
Key Strength	Mobile-oriented closeout workflows; advertised integrations with Procore and BIM 360	Transparent pricing and strong plans/tasks field workflow	Breadth of modules, large ecosystem, enterprise adoption
Key Weakness	Public security posture and enterprise feature disclosures are limited; reporting depth has been criticized; value-based pricing can reduce predictability	Some users report usability issues at scale; per-user pricing can add up in large deployments	Pricing is often custom and can be costly; implementation complexity and module-based licensing can increase TCO

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Feature differentiation:

Buildup: focused on punch lists, inspections, and closeout workflows with emphasis on field-oriented capture and export capabilities.
Fieldwire: selected for plan viewing, task management, and field coordination with transparent per-user licensing.
Procore: selected when buyers require an end-to-end platform covering RFIs, submittals, financials, and broader project controls.

Pricing comparison and value perception:

Buildup Core has a publicly listed monthly price, while Buildup+ uses value-based pricing tied to construction value, which can complicate forecasting.
Fieldwire publishes transparent tiered pricing including a free entry option.
Procore uses customized pricing dependent on construction volume and selected modules.

Market adoption and buyer behavior (directional):

Buildup's acquisition was noted as part of construction technology consolidation trends.
Some contractors seek lighter-weight tools than enterprise platforms for cost and fit reasons, creating demand for focused execution tools.

	Buildup	Fieldwire (Hilti)	Procore
Starting Price	Published monthly and annual per-seat pricing available from the vendor	Transparent per-user tiered pricing, including a free entry tier	Custom (depends on products and annual construction volume; not publicly itemized)
Best For	Teams prioritizing punch list, inspections, and closeout workflows; organizations that integrate with Procore/BIM 360	Field execution (plans + tasks + checklists) with transparent per-user pricing	Organizations seeking an end-to-end construction management platform across project and financial workflows
Key Strength	Mobile-oriented closeout workflows; advertised integrations with Procore and BIM 360	Transparent pricing and strong plans/tasks field workflow	Breadth of modules, large ecosystem, enterprise adoption
Key Weakness	Public security posture and enterprise feature disclosures are limited; reporting depth has been criticized; value-based pricing can reduce predictability	Some users report usability issues at scale; per-user pricing can add up in large deployments	Pricing is often custom and can be costly; implementation complexity and module-based licensing can increase TCO

Buildup

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map