Udemy Business

Name: Udemy Business
Brand: Udemy

Leader

where skills happen.

Est 2010|Valuation $677.3M|Raised $910.1M|249 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1.7M|Website|Web traffic 56.1M|FTEs 1,380|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsIdentity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)

Platform CoversLearning Management System (LMS)Sales Training & Learning Management Systems (LMS)

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Udemy Business | LinkedIn Learning | Coursera for Business | |--------|---------------|------------------|-----------------------| | Starting Price | Published per-user monthly pricing (billed annually) | Organization pricing: contact vendor | Published per-user annual pricing for certain plans | | Recommended Use Cases | Broad skill coverage; rapid deployment for small teams; mix of technical and business topics; organizations that plan to curate content | Organizations seeking consistent production quality and LinkedIn integration for career development features | Organizations prioritizing recognized credentials and structured academic/industry content | | Key Strength | Wide catalog and multiple content modalities; available hands-on add-ons (Pro) | Career ecosystem integration and curated catalog production | Professional certificates and partnerships with universities and industry providers | | Key Weakness | Course quality variance and content overlap; curation effort and some enterprise pricing opacity | Pricing and licensing can be opaque for organizations; catalog breadth may vary by topic area | Potentially higher per-user cost and contract complexity compared with basic team subscriptions | - Pricing comparison (evidence-based where possible) - Udemy Business Team Plan is published with per-user monthly pricing billed annually. - Coursera for Teams has published per-user annual pricing for certain plans. - LinkedIn Learning organization pricing is generally handled via sales and is not consistently published. - Feature differentiation highlights - Udemy Business differentiators (reported by vendor and observed in customer feedback) - Large course catalog and support for multiple languages; company-level personalization features noted in vendor comparisons. Buyers should validate catalog coverage and language availability against organizational needs during evaluation. - Coursera for Business differentiators - Emphasis on professional certificates, partner content from academic and industry partners, and enterprise integration options. - Customer testimonial comparisons - Direct comparative user quotes were limited in the accessible sources during this research run. AI-generated review summaries on comparison pages provide directional signals but should not replace reading full review text for procurement decisions.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Udemy Business	LinkedIn Learning	Coursera for Business
Starting Price	Published per-user monthly pricing (billed annually)	Organization pricing: contact vendor	Published per-user annual pricing for certain plans
Recommended Use Cases	Broad skill coverage; rapid deployment for small teams; mix of technical and business topics; organizations that plan to curate content	Organizations seeking consistent production quality and LinkedIn integration for career development features	Organizations prioritizing recognized credentials and structured academic/industry content
Key Strength	Wide catalog and multiple content modalities; available hands-on add-ons (Pro)	Career ecosystem integration and curated catalog production	Professional certificates and partnerships with universities and industry providers
Key Weakness	Course quality variance and content overlap; curation effort and some enterprise pricing opacity	Pricing and licensing can be opaque for organizations; catalog breadth may vary by topic area	Potentially higher per-user cost and contract complexity compared with basic team subscriptions

Pricing comparison (evidence-based where possible)
- Udemy Business Team Plan is published with per-user monthly pricing billed annually.
- Coursera for Teams has published per-user annual pricing for certain plans.
- LinkedIn Learning organization pricing is generally handled via sales and is not consistently published.
Feature differentiation highlights
- Udemy Business differentiators (reported by vendor and observed in customer feedback)
  - Large course catalog and support for multiple languages; company-level personalization features noted in vendor comparisons. Buyers should validate catalog coverage and language availability against organizational needs during evaluation.
- Coursera for Business differentiators
  - Emphasis on professional certificates, partner content from academic and industry partners, and enterprise integration options.
Customer testimonial comparisons
- Direct comparative user quotes were limited in the accessible sources during this research run. AI-generated review summaries on comparison pages provide directional signals but should not replace reading full review text for procurement decisions.

Aspect

Udemy Business

LinkedIn Learning

Coursera for Business

Starting Price

Published per-user monthly pricing (billed annually)

Organization pricing: contact vendor

Published per-user annual pricing for certain plans

Recommended Use Cases

Broad skill coverage; rapid deployment for small teams; mix of technical and business topics; organizations that plan to curate content

Organizations seeking consistent production quality and LinkedIn integration for career development features

Organizations prioritizing recognized credentials and structured academic/industry content

Key Strength

Wide catalog and multiple content modalities; available hands-on add-ons (Pro)

Career ecosystem integration and curated catalog production

Professional certificates and partnerships with universities and industry providers

Key Weakness

Course quality variance and content overlap; curation effort and some enterprise pricing opacity

Pricing and licensing can be opaque for organizations; catalog breadth may vary by topic area

Potentially higher per-user cost and contract complexity compared with basic team subscriptions