Cargomatic

Name: Cargomatic
Brand: Cargomatic

Leader

At Cargomatic, We Deliver More.

Est 2013|Valuation $1B|Raised $227.7M|2 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 26K|Web traffic 10K|FTEs 262|HQ Long Beach, California, US

MarketsSupply Chain Visibility Freight Management

Published Aug 13, 2026

01Common complaints

If an organization requires independently verified security certifications to be publicly available (SOC 2/ISO): public materials reviewed do not clearly document these certifications.
If the primary need is multi-source visibility across a very large telematics and carrier ecosystem: dedicated visibility platforms (project44, FourKites) may offer deeper integrations and analytics; Cargomatic may be used for execution in selected lanes.
If global forwarding and end-to-end customs brokerage are core requirements: consider dedicated global forwarders and freight forwarders such as Flexport, Maersk, Kuehne+Nagel, or DHL Global Forwarding.
If the carrier base strongly resists driver apps or operations depend on flawless mobile app UX: carrier app feedback indicates potential risk; validate via pilot.
If a self-serve SaaS with publicly advertised subscription pricing is required: Cargomatic’s public materials indicate a quote- and contract-driven approach rather than transparent subscription tiers.

- If an organization requires independently verified security certifications to be publicly available (SOC 2/ISO): public materials reviewed do not clearly document these certifications. - If the primary need is multi-source visibility across a very large telematics and carrier ecosystem: dedicated visibility platforms (project44, FourKites) may offer deeper integrations and analytics; Cargomatic may be used for execution in selected lanes. - If global forwarding and end-to-end customs brokerage are core requirements: consider dedicated global forwarders and freight forwarders such as Flexport, Maersk, Kuehne+Nagel, or DHL Global Forwarding. - If the carrier base strongly resists driver apps or operations depend on flawless mobile app UX: carrier app feedback indicates potential risk; validate via pilot. - If a self-serve SaaS with publicly advertised subscription pricing is required: Cargomatic’s public materials indicate a quote- and contract-driven approach rather than transparent subscription tiers.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require publicly available SOC 2 or ISO documentation as a gating requirement (unless vendor can provide private evidence).
Teams that cannot tolerate carrier mobile-app friction when drivers must rely on an app for operations.
Highly specialized global forwarding needs (air/ocean end-to-end) where global forwarders may be a better fit.

Issues evidenced in public sources

Carrier mobile app (Android) reports: login and sign-up problems, freezing or slow performance, job upload issues, and notification behavior changes.

Limitations and unknowns due to lack of public disclosure

Security certifications and enterprise security features are not clearly documented publicly.
Formal platform SLAs (uptime, response times) are not found in the reviewed sources.
Roadmap and release transparency were not evident in public materials reviewed.

02Why they buy

Unique selling points supported by available evidence

Local freight and drayage emphasis with vendor-asserted U.S. port coverage.
Command platform positioned as a centralized portal for ordering, tracking, and billing.
Track and trace functionality using smartphone GPS to reduce carrier hardware requirements.

Where competitors may have clearer advantages

Uber Freight: highly productized instant quoting and large digital marketplace footprint.
Large brokers (C.H. Robinson): breadth of services, global coverage, and mature managed transportation programs.
Visibility vendors: deeper tracking ecosystem integrations and analytics.

03Field reports

Important caveat on review availability

Vendor-published testimonials (marketing-selected)
App store and mobile app review summaries (relevant for carriers/drivers)
Employee reviews (Glassdoor/Indeed) as an operational signal (indirect)

For many B2B logistics providers, reviews may be sparse or not well-represented on standard software review platforms. In this research, clear, accessible listings on major software review sites were not found in the returned sources. The section below relies on: - Vendor-published testimonials (marketing-selected) - App store and mobile app review summaries (relevant for carriers/drivers) - Employee reviews (Glassdoor/Indeed) as an operational signal (indirect)

Vendor-published testimonials (positive; marketing-selected)

Vendor-curated carrier testimonials include statements such as: "The things I love about Cargomatic is the fast responses, payments are made right away, and you get more jobs on demand." and "I would definitely recommend Cargomatic to others. It’s a family company…" These are selected by the vendor and should be interpreted as illustrative of messaging themes (responsiveness, payment cadence, job availability) rather than independent validation.

Carrier app sentiment (more mixed / negative)

Public summaries of Android reviews for the Cargomatic Driver app indicate mixed satisfaction and recurring functional complaints:

Reported issues include login and sign-up problems, freezing or slow performance, job upload issues, and removal of or problems with notifications.
Some users report unhelpful customer service.

The Apple App Store listing is moderately rated on the Apple App Store with limited review volume, suggesting iOS sentiment may be somewhat more favorable in that sample, but sample sizes are small and not necessarily representative.

Public summaries of Android reviews for the Cargomatic Driver app indicate mixed satisfaction and recurring functional complaints: - Reported issues include login and sign-up problems, freezing or slow performance, job upload issues, and removal of or problems with notifications. - Some users report unhelpful customer service. The Apple App Store listing is moderately rated on the Apple App Store with limited review volume, suggesting iOS sentiment may be somewhat more favorable in that sample, but sample sizes are small and not necessarily representative.

Employee reviews (indirect signals about execution risk)

Employee review platforms include mixed feedback about culture and operations:

Negative themes include descriptions of a dysfunctional environment, layoffs, poor systems cohesion, high turnover/burnout, lack of training, and management issues.
Positive reviews also exist, indicating mixed experiences.

Implications for buyers: employee sentiment is not a product-quality metric but can be a proxy for stability of account management/support, pace and quality of product delivery, and operational consistency (billing, claims, exception management).

Employee review platforms include mixed feedback about culture and operations: - Negative themes include descriptions of a dysfunctional environment, layoffs, poor systems cohesion, high turnover/burnout, lack of training, and management issues. - Positive reviews also exist, indicating mixed experiences. Implications for buyers: employee sentiment is not a product-quality metric but can be a proxy for stability of account management/support, pace and quality of product delivery, and operational consistency (billing, claims, exception management).

Reasons customers chose Cargomatic (as implied by messaging and testimonials)

Based on vendor positioning and testimonial themes, likely selection drivers include:

Need for local and port drayage capacity and same-day service.
Visibility (track & trace) that can be achieved via smartphone location without dedicated hardware.
Workflow and billing consolidation in Command (centralized portal).

Reasons customers might leave or avoid

Independent shipper reviews were not located in the sources reviewed. However plausible churn factors based on app sentiment and employee feedback include:

Reliability issues in the carrier app affecting compliance and tracking.
Variability in support responsiveness.
Operational inconsistency during peak periods or periods of internal reorganization.

Public case studies found

Detailed third-party-validated case studies with methodology were not clearly present in the sources used.

Vendor-claimed outcomes (need validation)

The vendor references metrics such as claimed high on-time delivery and significant delivery volumes, as well as tender acceptance rates and levels of touchless freight.

Critical evaluation:

These metrics are meaningful if validated, but the methodology (measurement period, definitions of on-time, exclusions, sample composition) is not provided in the reviewed materials.
Buyers should request KPI definitions, sample scorecards, reference customers in relevant verticals, and any audited or contractually-backed SLAs.

The vendor references metrics such as claimed high on-time delivery and significant delivery volumes, as well as tender acceptance rates and levels of touchless freight. Critical evaluation: - These metrics are meaningful if validated, but the methodology (measurement period, definitions of on-time, exclusions, sample composition) is not provided in the reviewed materials. - Buyers should request KPI definitions, sample scorecards, reference customers in relevant verticals, and any audited or contractually-backed SLAs.

04Best fit

Company size (practical ranges)

Likely best fit (inferred from positioning):

Mid-market to enterprise shippers and 3PLs with meaningful local freight volume, particularly where port drayage is significant.
Practical qualification ranges for lead scoring could include organizations with a few hundred to many thousands of employees and enterprise importers and retailers at scale.

Industries/verticals

Vendor positioning and third-party profiles suggest presence in:

Retail and e-commerce fulfillment
CPG and beverages
Furniture and home improvement
Electronics
Automotive
Port/import-heavy supply chains

Roles/personas

VP/Director of Transportation
Logistics and Operations Managers at ports and DCs
3PL Operations and Account Management
Procurement and Sourcing for freight
IT/Integration leads (EDI/API)

Pain points addressed

Port and metro area capacity constraints
Requirement for same-day local moves
Visibility gaps and exception management
Manual brokerage processes (calls, emails, spreadsheets)
Billing and paperwork fragmentation

05The pitch

What the product does (objective value proposition)

Key capabilities described by the vendor include:

Same-day capacity for local freight (including ports).
Digital dispatch and booking (APIs/EDI/spreadsheets supported).
Visibility (GPS tracking, status updates) and paperless billing.

Vendor-asserted performance and scale claims include on-time performance, tender acceptance, driver network size, and U.S. port coverage. These are vendor-stated metrics and should be validated by buyers (see "Case Studies" and "Critical Analysis" sections for guidance).

Cargomatic is a technology-enabled freight brokerage and managed transportation provider focused on local and regional intra-city freight (commonly under ~500 miles) and port/rail drayage, with additional coverage across modes such as intermodal, LTL, FTL, and white-glove. The company operates a model that combines a digital marketplace, shipper workflow tooling ("Command"), and a carrier mobile application with GPS-based tracking. Key capabilities described by the vendor include: - Same-day capacity for local freight (including ports). - Digital dispatch and booking (APIs/EDI/spreadsheets supported). - Visibility (GPS tracking, status updates) and paperless billing. Vendor-asserted performance and scale claims include on-time performance, tender acceptance, driver network size, and U.S. port coverage. These are vendor-stated metrics and should be validated by buyers (see "Case Studies" and "Critical Analysis" sections for guidance).

Target market and positioning

Cargomatic targets primarily:

Enterprise shippers with complex local freight needs (retail, CPG, import/export).
3PLs that require a single portal for ordering, tracking, and billing and proactive exception management.
Port-centric freight (drayage and intermodal handoffs).

The vendor messaging is oriented toward enterprise customers (coverage, integrations, workflow management, centralized platform), rather than small-business self-serve—although an instant-quote self-serve experience is available on a related LTL quoting site.

Cargomatic targets primarily: - Enterprise shippers with complex local freight needs (retail, CPG, import/export). - 3PLs that require a single portal for ordering, tracking, and billing and proactive exception management. - Port-centric freight (drayage and intermodal handoffs). The vendor messaging is oriented toward enterprise customers (coverage, integrations, workflow management, centralized platform), rather than small-business self-serve—although an instant-quote self-serve experience is available on a related LTL quoting site.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Cargomatic including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →