Celonis

Name: Celonis
Brand: Celonis

Leader

When processes work, everything works.

Est 2011|Valuation $13B|Raised $1.4B|25 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 352K|Web traffic 295K|FTEs 3,500|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsBusiness Process Management (BPM)

Platform CoversData Preparation Data Integration (ETL/ELT)Workflow Automation

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Celonis vs SAP Signavio - SAP Signavio typically requires a request-for-quote and offers capabilities focused on process modeling, governance, and collaboration. - Third-party comparisons suggest Signavio can be stronger in collaboration and a shared process repository, while Celonis is frequently selected for operational execution and programmatic value capture. - Practical implication: If the buyer’s primary need is process modeling, governance, and SAP transformation alignment, Signavio may be a closer fit. If the buyer’s priority is cross-system mining and operational actioning at enterprise scale, Celonis is often considered. Celonis vs IBM Process Mining - IBM publishes entry-level pricing information and references ROI in its materials. That pricing transparency can reduce early procurement friction. - IBM emphasizes integration with its broader ecosystem and includes assistant features in its messaging. - Celonis is widely cited in market discussions; however, vendor leadership statements should be validated through independent analyst reports. Celonis vs Microsoft Power Automate (Process Mining) - Microsoft offers process mining capabilities as part of Power Automate licensing, with public list pricing for relevant licensing tiers. - For Microsoft-centric organizations, the integration and procurement simplicity of Microsoft offerings can be compelling for lighter process mining needs. - Celonis is typically evaluated for deeper, enterprise-scale process mining programs; Microsoft may be sufficient where requirements are lighter and integration with Microsoft tooling is a priority. Celonis vs UiPath Process Mining - UiPath Process Mining is often considered when an organization has an RPA-centered program and existing UiPath investments. Pricing and fit vary by enterprise agreements and use case.

	Celonis	SAP Signavio	IBM Process Mining
Starting Price	Quote-based / not publicly listed for core platform	Quote-based (request a quote)	Published starting price at entry SaaS level
Best For	Large enterprises needing deep process mining and operationalization programs	SAP-centric transformation governance, modeling, and process insights	Organizations seeking published entry pricing and integration with the IBM ecosystem
Key Strength	Deep process transparency, established presence in enterprise accounts, broad use-case support	Collaboration and process repository capabilities aligned to SAP transformation	Transparent entry pricing and multiple deployment options (SaaS/on-prem)
Key Weakness	Implementation complexity, learning curve, perceived high cost	Pricing not transparent; may be most suited when SAP stack is primary	Feature depth and specific capabilities may vary by use case; ROI claims should be evaluated against methodology

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Celonis vs SAP Signavio

SAP Signavio typically requires a request-for-quote and offers capabilities focused on process modeling, governance, and collaboration.
Third-party comparisons suggest Signavio can be stronger in collaboration and a shared process repository, while Celonis is frequently selected for operational execution and programmatic value capture.
Practical implication: If the buyer’s primary need is process modeling, governance, and SAP transformation alignment, Signavio may be a closer fit. If the buyer’s priority is cross-system mining and operational actioning at enterprise scale, Celonis is often considered.

Celonis vs IBM Process Mining

IBM publishes entry-level pricing information and references ROI in its materials. That pricing transparency can reduce early procurement friction.
IBM emphasizes integration with its broader ecosystem and includes assistant features in its messaging.
Celonis is widely cited in market discussions; however, vendor leadership statements should be validated through independent analyst reports.

Celonis vs Microsoft Power Automate (Process Mining)

Microsoft offers process mining capabilities as part of Power Automate licensing, with public list pricing for relevant licensing tiers.
For Microsoft-centric organizations, the integration and procurement simplicity of Microsoft offerings can be compelling for lighter process mining needs.
Celonis is typically evaluated for deeper, enterprise-scale process mining programs; Microsoft may be sufficient where requirements are lighter and integration with Microsoft tooling is a priority.

Celonis vs UiPath Process Mining

UiPath Process Mining is often considered when an organization has an RPA-centered program and existing UiPath investments. Pricing and fit vary by enterprise agreements and use case.

	Celonis	SAP Signavio	IBM Process Mining
Starting Price	Quote-based / not publicly listed for core platform	Quote-based (request a quote)	Published starting price at entry SaaS level
Best For	Large enterprises needing deep process mining and operationalization programs	SAP-centric transformation governance, modeling, and process insights	Organizations seeking published entry pricing and integration with the IBM ecosystem
Key Strength	Deep process transparency, established presence in enterprise accounts, broad use-case support	Collaboration and process repository capabilities aligned to SAP transformation	Transparent entry pricing and multiple deployment options (SaaS/on-prem)
Key Weakness	Implementation complexity, learning curve, perceived high cost	Pricing not transparent; may be most suited when SAP stack is primary	Feature depth and specific capabilities may vary by use case; ROI claims should be evaluated against methodology