Centage

Name: Centage
Brand: Centage
Rating: 4.2 (101 reviews)

Centage automates budgeting, scenario planning, and consolidation.

Est 2001|Valuation $48.3M|Raised $24.3M|34 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 5K|Web traffic 1K|FTEs 60|HQ San Antonio, Texas, US

MarketsBudgeting & Forecasting Headcount & Workforce Planning

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

- Centage vs Workday Adaptive Planning: Adaptive is often perceived as a more widely adopted option in mid-market FP&A with broad integrations; Centage positions itself with an explicit workforce planning emphasis and publicly posted entry pricing. Mindshare indicators vary by source. - Centage vs Prophix: Centage provides side-by-side comparison materials. Independent reviews indicate Centage may encounter reporting and performance challenges at scale, while some users highlight flexibility and support as strengths. Prophix is frequently shortlisted for mid-market budgeting and consolidation; relative strengths depend on customer requirements and implementation strategy. - Centage vs Planful: Both target mid-market FP&A requirements; public sources did not provide extensive direct user comparisons between the two.

Customer testimonials comparing to competitors

Vendor-curated comparison content critiques competitors’ visualization or template performance; such material is curated by the vendor and should be treated as non-neutral.

	Centage	Workday Adaptive Planning	Prophix
Starting Price	Published list pricing (billed annually) with entry tier in the low thousands per month	Typically quote-based (varies widely)	Typically quote-based (varies widely)
Best For	Mid-market teams needing driver-based FP&A and workforce planning with configurable models	Mid-market to enterprise teams requiring broad ecosystem integration and scalable modeling	Mid-market finance teams focused on budgeting, consolidation, and reporting workflows
Key Strength	Workforce planning, driver-based modeling, and publicly posted entry pricing; multiple reviews report responsive support	Market adoption, broad integrations, and mature modeling/workflow capabilities	Mid-market adoption; emphasis on budgeting and consolidation workflows
Key Weakness	Reports of reporting/analytics complexity and performance issues at scale; mixed implementation outcomes	Cost and implementation complexity can be high	Can require consultants or IT support for complex deployments

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Centage vs Workday Adaptive Planning: Adaptive is often perceived as a more widely adopted option in mid-market FP&A with broad integrations; Centage positions itself with an explicit workforce planning emphasis and publicly posted entry pricing. Mindshare indicators vary by source.
Centage vs Prophix: Centage provides side-by-side comparison materials. Independent reviews indicate Centage may encounter reporting and performance challenges at scale, while some users highlight flexibility and support as strengths. Prophix is frequently shortlisted for mid-market budgeting and consolidation; relative strengths depend on customer requirements and implementation strategy.
Centage vs Planful: Both target mid-market FP&A requirements; public sources did not provide extensive direct user comparisons between the two.

Customer testimonials comparing to competitors

Vendor-curated comparison content critiques competitors’ visualization or template performance; such material is curated by the vendor and should be treated as non-neutral.

	Centage	Workday Adaptive Planning	Prophix
Starting Price	Published list pricing (billed annually) with entry tier in the low thousands per month	Typically quote-based (varies widely)	Typically quote-based (varies widely)
Best For	Mid-market teams needing driver-based FP&A and workforce planning with configurable models	Mid-market to enterprise teams requiring broad ecosystem integration and scalable modeling	Mid-market finance teams focused on budgeting, consolidation, and reporting workflows
Key Strength	Workforce planning, driver-based modeling, and publicly posted entry pricing; multiple reviews report responsive support	Market adoption, broad integrations, and mature modeling/workflow capabilities	Mid-market adoption; emphasis on budgeting and consolidation workflows
Key Weakness	Reports of reporting/analytics complexity and performance issues at scale; mixed implementation outcomes	Cost and implementation complexity can be high	Can require consultants or IT support for complex deployments