Check Point Remote Access VPN
LeaderCustomers rely on Lakera for real-time security that doesn’t slow down their GenAI applications.
Est 1993|Valuation $14.1B|Raised $1.8B
MarketsEnterprise Networking
Customers rely on Lakera for real-time security that doesn’t slow down their GenAI applications.
Published May 16, 2026
An increasing number of buyers evaluate ZTNA/SASE approaches that provide per-application access and identity-centric controls rather than full network-level VPN connectivity. The vendor also presents SASE offerings as alternatives to traditional VPN deployments.
| Starting Price | Quote-based; not clearly published on the product page | Published pricing typically provided by vendor or channel quotation | Subscription pricing varies by model and distribution channel |
| Typical fit | Organizations standardized on Check Point gateways and SmartConsole requiring centralized policy | Cisco-centric enterprises with a broad endpoint module ecosystem | Organizations with Palo Alto NGFW deployments seeking tight integration |
| Key Strength | Centralized management and policy visibility; integration with Check Point ecosystem | Mature client footprint and broad ecosystem | Integration with Palo Alto Networks firewall stack and PAN-OS features |
| Key Weakness | Configuration complexity, documentation and troubleshooting challenges, client compatibility issues, Linux client gaps | Licensing and packaging complexity; migration to newer client modules can require planning | Subscription costs and operational considerations depending on deployment model |