C.H. Robinson Managed Solutions

Name: C.H. Robinson Managed Solutions
Brand: C.H. Robinson
Rating: 2.8 (172 reviews)

Leader

Logistics like no one elseTM

Est 1905|Valuation $22.5B|53 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 384K|Website|Web traffic 430K|FTEs 11,855|HQ Eden Prairie, Minnesota, US

MarketsFreight Management

C.H. Robinson Managed Solutions screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

CHRW vs Flexport: CHRW provides North American surface brokerage density and managed transportation heritage; Flexport offers forwarding, fulfillment, and integrated digital workflows with some published program constructs.
CHRW vs asset-based carriers (e.g., XPO LTL): CHRW operates as an intermediary and managed service provider; asset carriers provide direct service control but may have rigid billing/accessorial structures.
CHRW vs global forwarders (e.g., Kuehne+Nagel): Forwarders compete on international forwarding and contract logistics depth; CHRW competes with its technology platform combined with brokerage scale.

- CHRW vs Flexport: CHRW provides North American surface brokerage density and managed transportation heritage; Flexport offers forwarding, fulfillment, and integrated digital workflows with some published program constructs. - CHRW vs asset-based carriers (e.g., XPO LTL): CHRW operates as an intermediary and managed service provider; asset carriers provide direct service control but may have rigid billing/accessorial structures. - CHRW vs global forwarders (e.g., Kuehne+Nagel): Forwarders compete on international forwarding and contract logistics depth; CHRW competes with its technology platform combined with brokerage scale.

Market/adoption signals

CHRW self-reports large network counts (customers/carriers/shipments); independent confirmation of these exact numbers was not found in the materials reviewed. Treat these figures as vendor claims unless independently verified.

	C.H. Robinson	Flexport	XPO (LTL focus)
Starting Price	Quote‑based (not publicly standardized)	Service pricing published for some fulfillment offerings; program minimums have been reported	Contract pricing is negotiated; published tariffs and accessorial rules apply
Best For	Shippers needing multimodal capacity and managed options; carriers seeking load access	Customers seeking integrated digital forwarding and fulfillment with packaged workflows	Shippers with significant North American LTL needs and carrier‑direct LTL relationships
Key Strength	Large network scale, integrated platform (Navisphere), and broad managed services	Technology-oriented customer experience and packaged fulfillment workflows	Dense LTL network coverage and standardized LTL operating model
Key Weakness	Service variability and communication issues reported in public reviews	Program minimums and potential pricing thresholds for smaller customers	Community complaints about billing and accessorial disputes