Cint

Name: Cint
Brand: Cint

Feeding the world’s curiosity. https://www.cint.com/

Est 1998|Valuation $137M|Raised $596.8M|38 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 194K|Web traffic 9.5M|FTEs 930|HQ Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Cint vs Dynata: Dynata emphasizes access to its own panel and DIY tooling. For buyers who prefer first-party panel ownership to reduce fraud and duplicates, Dynata may be more appropriate; Cint’s marketplace can offer broader integrated supply and programmatic routing.
Cint vs Toluna: Toluna provides automation and documented pricing model types. Cint competes on exchange scale and on trust and safety practices.
Cint vs Prolific: Prolific focuses on curated, owned participants and is commonly presented as an alternative when authenticity and attentiveness are critical.

- Cint vs Dynata: Dynata emphasizes access to its own panel and DIY tooling. For buyers who prefer first-party panel ownership to reduce fraud and duplicates, Dynata may be more appropriate; Cint’s marketplace can offer broader integrated supply and programmatic routing. - Cint vs Toluna: Toluna provides automation and documented pricing model types. Cint competes on exchange scale and on trust and safety practices. - Cint vs Prolific: Prolific focuses on curated, owned participants and is commonly presented as an alternative when authenticity and attentiveness are critical.

Market adoption trends

Vendor messaging highlights a broad client base and reported high survey completion volumes.
Listing and M&A activity reflect strategic expansion into measurement and automation at scale.

	Cint	Dynata	Toluna (SampleXpress / integrated panel ecosystem)
Starting Price	Not publicly standardized; typically project-based CPI/rate card	Not publicly standardized (often quote-based / platform-based)	Not publicly standardized; pricing models include fixed, programmatic, or grid structures depending on contract
Best For	Large-scale, multi-country survey sample; integrations; marketplace approach	Organizations wanting access to a large first-party panel + DIY tools	Panel and sample sourcing with automation tooling and integrated panel programs
Key Strength	Large supply network and marketplace automation; emphasizes fraud-prevention	First-party panel positioning and DIY workflows	Platform and integration options; structured pricing model choices; automation tooling
Key Weakness	Quality can vary across third-party supply; cost opacity; feasibility concerns in some use cases	Can be expensive; panel availability varies by niche and country	B2C panel reputation can be mixed; quality and screen-out issues reported in some communities

Cint

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market adoption trends

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market adoption trends

02Market Map