Cisco IOS Embedded Packet Capture

Name: Cisco IOS Embedded Packet Capture
Brand: Cisco
Rating: 4.6 (400 reviews)

Leader

We securely connect everything to make anything possible.

Est 1984|Valuation $449.2B|Raised $49.2B

LinkedIn 7.6M|Website|Web traffic 11.8M|FTEs 95,663|HQ San Jose, California, US

MarketsEnterprise Networking

Cisco IOS Embedded Packet Capture screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Areas where EPC is most useful - Short, targeted troubleshooting on remote devices where it is not feasible to deploy a tap or SPAN endpoint. - Situations that require capture directly on the forwarding device without reconfiguring SPAN sessions. - Areas where alternatives are preferable - SPAN/ERSPAN with external capture hosts is generally preferred for longer-duration captures or to avoid on-box resource contention. - Dedicated capture appliances and packet brokers are better suited for very high-throughput links and continuous retention with centralized governance. - Cloud-managed capture tools can provide simpler workflows for distributed branch deployments but are part of different product stacks. - Practitioner guidance - Community guidance commonly recommends using EPC for convenience in ad-hoc situations, but often prefers ERSPAN or external capture hosts for live analysis or when EPC does not capture expected traffic.

	Cisco IOS Embedded Packet Capture (EPC)	SPAN/ERSPAN + external capture host	Cisco Meraki Dashboard packet capture
Starting price	Typically included in the vendor's IOS/IOS XE feature set; software image and licensing requirements may apply	Requires switch mirroring features plus an external capture host; additional infrastructure costs apply	Included as part of the Meraki platform; vendor licensing for the Meraki platform required
Primary use case	CLI-driven operations teams needing on-device capture on routers/switches	High-fidelity off-box capture and centralized collectors	Distributed branch environments managed via a cloud dashboard
Key advantages	On-device capture without additional hardware; exports to PCAP for offline analysis	Flexible vendor-agnostic analysis and scalable capture infrastructure	Simpler operational model for teams that use Meraki cloud management
Key limitations	Behavior varies by platform/release; potential CPU/memory impact; capture point complexity	Requires correct mirroring configuration and reachability to capture host	Different product architecture; not a replacement for IOS/IOS XE features

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas where EPC is most useful
- Short, targeted troubleshooting on remote devices where it is not feasible to deploy a tap or SPAN endpoint.
- Situations that require capture directly on the forwarding device without reconfiguring SPAN sessions.
Areas where alternatives are preferable
- SPAN/ERSPAN with external capture hosts is generally preferred for longer-duration captures or to avoid on-box resource contention.
- Dedicated capture appliances and packet brokers are better suited for very high-throughput links and continuous retention with centralized governance.
- Cloud-managed capture tools can provide simpler workflows for distributed branch deployments but are part of different product stacks.
Practitioner guidance
- Community guidance commonly recommends using EPC for convenience in ad-hoc situations, but often prefers ERSPAN or external capture hosts for live analysis or when EPC does not capture expected traffic.

	Cisco IOS Embedded Packet Capture (EPC)	SPAN/ERSPAN + external capture host	Cisco Meraki Dashboard packet capture
Starting price	Typically included in the vendor's IOS/IOS XE feature set; software image and licensing requirements may apply	Requires switch mirroring features plus an external capture host; additional infrastructure costs apply	Included as part of the Meraki platform; vendor licensing for the Meraki platform required
Primary use case	CLI-driven operations teams needing on-device capture on routers/switches	High-fidelity off-box capture and centralized collectors	Distributed branch environments managed via a cloud dashboard
Key advantages	On-device capture without additional hardware; exports to PCAP for offline analysis	Flexible vendor-agnostic analysis and scalable capture infrastructure	Simpler operational model for teams that use Meraki cloud management
Key limitations	Behavior varies by platform/release; potential CPU/memory impact; capture point complexity	Requires correct mirroring configuration and reachability to capture host	Different product architecture; not a replacement for IOS/IOS XE features