Cisco MDS 9000 NX-OS and SAN-OS Software

Name: Cisco MDS 9000 NX-OS and SAN-OS Software
Brand: Cisco
Rating: 4.1 (23 reviews)

Leader

We securely connect everything to make anything possible.

Est 1984|Valuation $449.2B|Raised $49.2B

LinkedIn 7.6M|Website|Web traffic 11.8M|FTEs 95,663|HQ San Jose, California, US

MarketsEnterprise Networking

Cisco MDS 9000 NX-OS and SAN-OS Software screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Cisco’s NX-OS model emphasizes NX-OS operational constructs and VSAN segmentation; vendor materials contrast this with Brocade fabric partitioning models. Community feedback is mixed and often anecdotal, with some users reporting operational preferences for one vendor’s workflows over another. - Brocade ecosystems can be more attractive where teams maintain extensive Brocade operational runbooks; migration to Cisco introduces learning and migration risks. - Centralized management controllers (NDFC / Nexus Dashboard vs SANnav) provide analytics and automation capabilities but introduce additional deployment and maintenance overhead; customer sentiment on controller stacks is mixed.

Market share / adoption trends

This report did not locate a current, authoritative independent dataset for FC switching market share in the public sources reviewed (e.g., industry analyst firms). No market share assertions are made without independent verification.

	Cisco MDS 9000 NX-OS / SAN-OS	Broadcom/Brocade Fabric OS (FOS)	Brocade SANnav (management)
Starting Price	Quote-based; tiered subscriptions and feature packages; public pricing limited	Quote-based; hardware and licenses quoted by vendor/partners	Reseller pricing varies; edition- and port-count-dependent; order-of-magnitude pricing signals available
Typical Use Case	Enterprises standardizing on Cisco MDS FC SANs; environments requiring VSANs, IVR, SAN Analytics, and automation	Enterprises with substantial Brocade footprints and Brocade operational expertise	Organizations seeking Brocade-centric GUI management and analytics for SANs
Key Strength	Integration with Cisco MDS hardware features and Cisco operational ecosystem; VSAN model and programmability options	Mature FC feature set and a large installed base; operational familiarity for Brocade teams	GUI-based workflows for SAN management and centralized visibility (depends on edition/version)
Key Weakness	Licensing and management tooling complexity; requiring additional management platforms to obtain GUI and analytics features	Licensing and transition complexity; potential integration challenges when migrating	Cost and licensing complexity; additional management platform overhead

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Cisco’s NX-OS model emphasizes NX-OS operational constructs and VSAN segmentation; vendor materials contrast this with Brocade fabric partitioning models. Community feedback is mixed and often anecdotal, with some users reporting operational preferences for one vendor’s workflows over another.
Brocade ecosystems can be more attractive where teams maintain extensive Brocade operational runbooks; migration to Cisco introduces learning and migration risks.
Centralized management controllers (NDFC / Nexus Dashboard vs SANnav) provide analytics and automation capabilities but introduce additional deployment and maintenance overhead; customer sentiment on controller stacks is mixed.

Market share / adoption trends

This report did not locate a current, authoritative independent dataset for FC switching market share in the public sources reviewed (e.g., industry analyst firms). No market share assertions are made without independent verification.

	Cisco MDS 9000 NX-OS / SAN-OS	Broadcom/Brocade Fabric OS (FOS)	Brocade SANnav (management)
Starting Price	Quote-based; tiered subscriptions and feature packages; public pricing limited	Quote-based; hardware and licenses quoted by vendor/partners	Reseller pricing varies; edition- and port-count-dependent; order-of-magnitude pricing signals available
Typical Use Case	Enterprises standardizing on Cisco MDS FC SANs; environments requiring VSANs, IVR, SAN Analytics, and automation	Enterprises with substantial Brocade footprints and Brocade operational expertise	Organizations seeking Brocade-centric GUI management and analytics for SANs
Key Strength	Integration with Cisco MDS hardware features and Cisco operational ecosystem; VSAN model and programmability options	Mature FC feature set and a large installed base; operational familiarity for Brocade teams	GUI-based workflows for SAN management and centralized visibility (depends on edition/version)
Key Weakness	Licensing and management tooling complexity; requiring additional management platforms to obtain GUI and analytics features	Licensing and transition complexity; potential integration challenges when migrating	Cost and licensing complexity; additional management platform overhead