Clari Groove

Name: Clari Groove
Brand: Clari
Rating: 4.4 (2987 reviews)

Clari & Salesloft have merged to form the Predictive Revenue System, where Al guides revenue teams to accelerate growth.

Est 2013|Valuation $2.6B|Raised $520M|80 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 122K|Website|Web traffic 615K|FTEs 654|HQ Sunnyvale, California, US

MarketsCRM Outreach Automation Sales Engagement Platforms (SEP)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Where Groove tends to be adopted - Organizations that prioritize Salesforce integration and embedding engagement workflows within existing Salesforce processes. - Teams seeking a relatively streamlined operational footprint and rapid onboarding in some cases. - Where competitors often have advantages - Outreach: Frequently referenced for its sequencing breadth and outbound capabilities, though users report sync complexity and occasional support issues. - Salesloft: Often selected for broader coaching and revenue orchestration workflows; implementation can be heavier and pricing negotiated. - Gong Engage: Sometimes chosen when organizations standardize on Gong; feature differences and Salesforce context integration vary by use case. - Pricing comparison reality - Outreach and Salesloft generally use sales-led pricing; Groove under Clari is also quote-based. Because of enterprise discounting and bundling, TCO varies with seat types, minimums, and services.

	Clari Groove	Outreach	Salesloft
Starting Price	Quote-based (not public on Clari)	Request pricing (per-user; not publicly listed)	Not publicly listed (packages shown; pricing via sales)
Best For	Salesforce-centric organizations seeking a Salesforce-aligned engagement layer and activity capture	Enterprises seeking broad sequencing and engagement capabilities with advanced outbound features	Organizations seeking engagement orchestration combined with coaching and analytics capabilities
Key Strength	Tight Salesforce workflow integration; activity capture; generally positive onboarding/support reviews	Breadth and maturity in sequencing and outbound tooling; extensive feature set	Broad platform capabilities with engagement and coaching features
Key Weakness	Reported dialer and integration issues; some users report UI and reliability concerns; pricing opacity	Cost and complexity for some buyers; integration and sync complexity reported in community discussions	Pricing opacity; implementation complexity for some teams

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Groove tends to be adopted
- Organizations that prioritize Salesforce integration and embedding engagement workflows within existing Salesforce processes.
- Teams seeking a relatively streamlined operational footprint and rapid onboarding in some cases.
Where competitors often have advantages
- Outreach: Frequently referenced for its sequencing breadth and outbound capabilities, though users report sync complexity and occasional support issues.
- Salesloft: Often selected for broader coaching and revenue orchestration workflows; implementation can be heavier and pricing negotiated.
- Gong Engage: Sometimes chosen when organizations standardize on Gong; feature differences and Salesforce context integration vary by use case.
Pricing comparison reality
- Outreach and Salesloft generally use sales-led pricing; Groove under Clari is also quote-based. Because of enterprise discounting and bundling, TCO varies with seat types, minimums, and services.

	Clari Groove	Outreach	Salesloft
Starting Price	Quote-based (not public on Clari)	Request pricing (per-user; not publicly listed)	Not publicly listed (packages shown; pricing via sales)
Best For	Salesforce-centric organizations seeking a Salesforce-aligned engagement layer and activity capture	Enterprises seeking broad sequencing and engagement capabilities with advanced outbound features	Organizations seeking engagement orchestration combined with coaching and analytics capabilities
Key Strength	Tight Salesforce workflow integration; activity capture; generally positive onboarding/support reviews	Breadth and maturity in sequencing and outbound tooling; extensive feature set	Broad platform capabilities with engagement and coaching features
Key Weakness	Reported dialer and integration issues; some users report UI and reliability concerns; pricing opacity	Cost and complexity for some buyers; integration and sync complexity reported in community discussions	Pricing opacity; implementation complexity for some teams