CleanDesign

Name: CleanDesign
Brand: CleanDesign

Operating in hybrid energy management systems, we are committed to decarbonization through enhanced energy efficiency

Est 2017|2 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 920|Website|FTEs 20|HQ Ontario, California, US

MarketsEnergy Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- CleanDesign vs Wärtsilä: Wärtsilä positions GEMS as a broad microgrid control platform with explicit discussion of organizational security practices. CleanDesign’s public materials are more focused on drilling-rig and diesel genset optimization and disclose less enterprise-grade security documentation. - CleanDesign vs Aggreko: Aggreko offers hybrid generation packages emphasizing operational flexibility and emissions reduction, often delivered via rental or service contracts. CleanDesign appears to offer a productized hybrid retrofit with proprietary control software and vertical focus. - CleanDesign vs Generac microgrid controllers: Generac provides controllers intended to interface with a wide variety of distributed energy resources. CleanDesign’s public messaging primarily focuses on battery-plus-genset optimization, suggesting a narrower but more vertically focused solution.

Customer testimonials comparing to competitors

No direct head-to-head customer quotes were found in accessible sources.

Market share and adoption trends

No reliable market share figures were found. Adoption is evidenced indirectly by mentions in drilling contractor press, references by industry partners, inclusion in H&P reporting, and a recent capital raise.

	CleanDesign (hEMS)	Wärtsilä (GEMS + storage)	Aggreko (Hybrid power solutions)
Starting Price	Quote-based (not public)	Quote-based (not public)	Quote-based; often rental/service-based
Typical fit	Drilling-rig retrofit and diesel-heavy operations seeking retrofit savings	Utility-scale and commercial/industrial microgrids needing broad asset orchestration and a mature platform	Temporary or rental-first deployments; rapid hybridization for mines, events, and industrial sites
Key Strength	Domain focus on drilling rigs; retrofit approach integrating battery and genset controls	Platform breadth and reference cases; documented organizational security processes for some offerings	Operational logistics, global service footprint, flexible commercial and rental models
Key Weakness	Limited public security/compliance documentation; scarce third-party user reviews; unclear pricing	May be larger-scale or more complex than needed for narrow retrofit use cases	May prioritize rental economics over long-term owner-operator optimization in some engagements

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

CleanDesign vs Wärtsilä: Wärtsilä positions GEMS as a broad microgrid control platform with explicit discussion of organizational security practices. CleanDesign’s public materials are more focused on drilling-rig and diesel genset optimization and disclose less enterprise-grade security documentation.
CleanDesign vs Aggreko: Aggreko offers hybrid generation packages emphasizing operational flexibility and emissions reduction, often delivered via rental or service contracts. CleanDesign appears to offer a productized hybrid retrofit with proprietary control software and vertical focus.
CleanDesign vs Generac microgrid controllers: Generac provides controllers intended to interface with a wide variety of distributed energy resources. CleanDesign’s public messaging primarily focuses on battery-plus-genset optimization, suggesting a narrower but more vertically focused solution.

Customer testimonials comparing to competitors

No direct head-to-head customer quotes were found in accessible sources.

Market share and adoption trends

	CleanDesign (hEMS)	Wärtsilä (GEMS + storage)	Aggreko (Hybrid power solutions)
Starting Price	Quote-based (not public)	Quote-based (not public)	Quote-based; often rental/service-based
Typical fit	Drilling-rig retrofit and diesel-heavy operations seeking retrofit savings	Utility-scale and commercial/industrial microgrids needing broad asset orchestration and a mature platform	Temporary or rental-first deployments; rapid hybridization for mines, events, and industrial sites
Key Strength	Domain focus on drilling rigs; retrofit approach integrating battery and genset controls	Platform breadth and reference cases; documented organizational security processes for some offerings	Operational logistics, global service footprint, flexible commercial and rental models
Key Weakness	Limited public security/compliance documentation; scarce third-party user reviews; unclear pricing	May be larger-scale or more complex than needed for narrow retrofit use cases	May prioritize rental economics over long-term owner-operator optimization in some engagements