Climes

Name: Climes
Brand: Climes

AI Native

Helping businesses measure emissions, meet global compliance standards & neutralise their impact

Est 2021|Valuation $10.9M|Raised $4.2M|35 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 9K|Website|FTEs 12|HQ IN

Published Oct 15, 2026

01Common complaints

- If an organization requires publicly documented enterprise security attestations (SOC 2 or ISO 27001) as part of an expedited procurement process. - If a brand cannot tolerate public scrutiny of neutralisation claims and prefers to avoid offsetting language in customer-facing communications. - If the primary requirement is a mature carbon accounting system focused on Scope 3 heavy analyses with deep ERP/procurement integrations and extensive customer references—larger carbon accounting vendors may be a better match. - If procurement decisions rely heavily on third-party review platforms (G2/TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights), since Climes appears to have a limited footprint on those platforms in accessible results. - If a buyer requires built-in independent project quality ratings and explicit retirement traceability (for example, BeZero/Sylvera-style scoring) without custom verification work, consider vendors or marketplaces that clearly integrate those capabilities.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require publicly documented SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certificates prior to procurement.
Organizations requiring extensive third-party validation and a large volume of peer reviews before selection.
Organizations that have policies against offsetting/neutralisation and prefer only direct emissions reductions or insetting.

Limitations evidenced in sources (and notable gaps)

- Limited third-party review footprint: no Climes-specific entries on G2/TrustRadius/Capterra were found in accessible search results. - Security and compliance transparency gap: no public SOC 2 or ISO 27001 statements were located in materials reviewed. - Uptime claim: API documentation references a 99.99% uptime figure, but no public status history or independent SLA evidence was available in the excerpts. - Category risk: neutralisation and offset claims face industry-wide skepticism; Climes’ public materials do not fully resolve those concerns without deeper project-level transparency.

Roadmap / future features

Climes’ pricing blog indicates intent to support higher-priced project types (for example, mangroves, CCS, and enhanced rock weathering) with incremental pricing adjustments. No specific timelines were published in the reviewed materials.

Why customers might leave (hypotheses grounded in market patterns)

Not directly evidenced for Climes in the sources found, but common churn drivers in this category include:

Concerns about credit quality and scrutiny of neutralisation claims.
Preference for vendors with stronger enterprise governance, audit support, and integrations.
Reputational risk if projects or credits used are later publicly challenged.

02Why they buy

Observed differentiators (based on available evidence)

A consumer unit concept (1 Clime = 1 kg CO2e) used to present contributions in small, discrete increments.
Support for multiple touchpoints: checkout, events, and logistics workflows rather than a single-purpose offset integration.
Regional pricing and project framing that emphasize projects in the Global South.

Areas where competitors may have an advantage

Independent validation and review presence: several competitors have a broader enterprise adoption and more extensive review footprints.
Security and compliance transparency: mature B2B vendors commonly publish security documentation and third-party attestations.
Project quality assurance: some providers explicitly surface independent rating partnerships or integrations that reduce reputational risk.

03Field reports

Review-platform availability (Gartner Peer Insights, G2, TrustRadius)

Gartner Peer Insights: no Climes-specific listing was found in accessible results during this research.
G2 / TrustRadius / Capterra: Climes-specific product pages or reviews were not found in accessible search results; searches returned unrelated products where “carbon” appeared as a keyword. This suggests limited presence or discoverability on major review platforms.

Vendor-published testimonials and case material

Because mainstream third-party review platforms did not return Climes-specific entries during this run, the available testimonial-like material is primarily vendor-published and should be treated as marketing-selected. Positive vendor-site testimonial (events): - Airbus India & South Asia (named on Climes events page) is quoted saying: “Shout out to Climes for helping us make this a carbon neutral event.” (vendor-published quote) Vendor-published case material (WRI): - A Climes resource page states WRI achieved full participation from a group of district-level officials using Carbon Neutral Events, and describes a mix of emissions-reduction steps plus neutralisation of residual emissions through Climes. These outcomes are vendor-published and do not include an independently documented methodology in the public excerpts reviewed. Press coverage signals (not reviews): - Forbes India (Sep 13, 2022) describes Climes’ checkout integrations and reports a founder-quoted figure indicating a substantial daily opt-in rate in a specific implementation referenced in the article.

Common criticisms and complaints (from accessible sources)

Direct Climes-specific complaints were scarce in public community or review sources located during this run. However, the broader category of carbon offsets and neutralisation faces extensive skepticism across public forums: - Community posts express difficulty finding independent reviews and question registries and project legitimacy. - Reddit discussions about offsets and removals highlight general skepticism and concerns about greenwashing across providers. Interpretation: the absence of Climes-specific negative reviews in accessible English-speaking review communities should not be interpreted as validation; it may indicate limited adoption, regional focus, or low public discussion volume.

Why customers choose Climes (inferred from sources)

Based on Climes’ positioning and partner mentions in press coverage, likely drivers include:

A streamlined consumer experience that reduces steps for participation in neutralisation at checkout.
A combined measurement and allocation flow that covers both calculation and project funding.
Pricing framed in local currency increments that make contributions small and understandable for some consumers.

WRI event case (vendor resource page)

- Claimed outcomes: a WRI workshop is described as using emissions reduction steps (for example, food choices, reduced disposables, digital promotion) and neutralising residual emissions through Climes; the page states full participation from a cohort of district-level officials. - Critical evaluation: these metrics are vendor-published; the definition of participation (for example, opt-in to neutralisation versus attendance) is not clarified, and the emissions calculation boundaries (travel, venue energy, materials) and factor sources are not disclosed in the public excerpts.

Carbon Neutral Events (vendor page)

Claimed metric: a substantial quantity of CO2e neutralised is shown on an events marketing page.
Critical evaluation: the timeframe, whether this is cumulative, and the verification or retirement proof for those credits are not documented in the public materials reviewed.

MakeMyTrip integration (press / secondary coverage)

Press coverage indicates MakeMyTrip offered a neutralisation option for flight bookings using Climes.
Critical evaluation: the existence of an integration supports product-market applicability for checkout neutralisation, but it does not validate credit quality or long-term customer satisfaction metrics.

04Best fit

Company sizes

Two plausible ICP bands based on Climes’ combined consumer and enterprise focus:

Digital brands and platforms (small to mid-market): organizations able to ship an API/checkout feature and seeking measurable consumer engagement.
Logistics and mobility operators (mid-market to large enterprise): organizations needing multi-modal emissions consolidation and customer-facing reporting.

Industries / verticals

Logistics and multimodal freight
Mobility and travel platforms
Events (corporate events, conferences)
Consumer brands seeking engagement at checkout

Roles and personas

Sustainability / ESG leads
Product managers (checkout / customer experience)
Operations / logistics analytics
Finance / compliance stakeholders (for disclosure use cases)

Qualification criteria (better fit)

Organizations seeking customer-facing climate action integrated into purchase flows.
Organizations willing to use neutralisation as a communications approach with appropriate disclaimers.
Organizations with internal capacity to manage carbon data and governance.

05The pitch

What the product does (core value proposition)

Climes is a climate-finance and carbon-intelligence solution with two related product directions: 1) Consumer/brand neutralisation at the point of sale: API and checkout integrations that present an emissions estimate for a transaction (e.g., travel, logistics, events) and enable the customer or the business to fund climate projects to allocate an emissions-equivalent amount. Climes defines 1 “Clime” as 1 kg CO2e and treats it as a unit customers can purchase or allocate to projects. 2) B2B carbon accounting and compliance-oriented carbon intelligence: product messaging and pages describe measurement across Scope 1/2/3 and alignment with standards/frameworks (for example, the GHG Protocol and logistics-specific references to GLEC) and state support for disclosure workflows intended to be compatible with audits. Important buyer caveat: Climes uses the language of “neutralise” and “carbon credits/projects.” In the broader market, such claims are often scrutinized (additionality, permanence, leakage, double-counting, and whether offsetting meaningfully compensates for ongoing emissions). Climes’ materials present a curated project portfolio and evolving pricing to support higher-priced project types; independent verification of those quality claims is not consistently visible in public sources.

Target market and positioning

- B2B (current positioning emphasis): logistics providers, mobility operators, and multimodal shipping companies needing carbon measurement and reporting plus potential customer-facing climate touchpoints. - Brands / consumer platforms: e-commerce, travel, events—embedding a neutralisation option at checkout via API integrations. - Market positioning: describes itself as a carbon-intelligence provider and a climate finance layer that connects measurement to project funding.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Climes including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →

Published Oct 15, 2026

01Common complaints

If an organization requires publicly documented enterprise security attestations (SOC 2 or ISO 27001) as part of an expedited procurement process.
If a brand cannot tolerate public scrutiny of neutralisation claims and prefers to avoid offsetting language in customer-facing communications.
If the primary requirement is a mature carbon accounting system focused on Scope 3 heavy analyses with deep ERP/procurement integrations and extensive customer references—larger carbon accounting vendors may be a better match.
If procurement decisions rely heavily on third-party review platforms (G2/TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights), since Climes appears to have a limited footprint on those platforms in accessible results.
If a buyer requires built-in independent project quality ratings and explicit retirement traceability (for example, BeZero/Sylvera-style scoring) without custom verification work, consider vendors or marketplaces that clearly integrate those capabilities.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations that require publicly documented SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certificates prior to procurement.
Organizations requiring extensive third-party validation and a large volume of peer reviews before selection.
Organizations that have policies against offsetting/neutralisation and prefer only direct emissions reductions or insetting.

Limitations evidenced in sources (and notable gaps)

Limited third-party review footprint: no Climes-specific entries on G2/TrustRadius/Capterra were found in accessible search results.
Security and compliance transparency gap: no public SOC 2 or ISO 27001 statements were located in materials reviewed.
Uptime claim: API documentation references a 99.99% uptime figure, but no public status history or independent SLA evidence was available in the excerpts.
Category risk: neutralisation and offset claims face industry-wide skepticism; Climes’ public materials do not fully resolve those concerns without deeper project-level transparency.

Roadmap / future features

Climes’ pricing blog indicates intent to support higher-priced project types (for example, mangroves, CCS, and enhanced rock weathering) with incremental pricing adjustments. No specific timelines were published in the reviewed materials.

Why customers might leave (hypotheses grounded in market patterns)

Not directly evidenced for Climes in the sources found, but common churn drivers in this category include:

Concerns about credit quality and scrutiny of neutralisation claims.
Preference for vendors with stronger enterprise governance, audit support, and integrations.
Reputational risk if projects or credits used are later publicly challenged.

02Why they buy

Observed differentiators (based on available evidence)

A consumer unit concept (1 Clime = 1 kg CO2e) used to present contributions in small, discrete increments.
Support for multiple touchpoints: checkout, events, and logistics workflows rather than a single-purpose offset integration.
Regional pricing and project framing that emphasize projects in the Global South.

Areas where competitors may have an advantage

Independent validation and review presence: several competitors have a broader enterprise adoption and more extensive review footprints.
Security and compliance transparency: mature B2B vendors commonly publish security documentation and third-party attestations.
Project quality assurance: some providers explicitly surface independent rating partnerships or integrations that reduce reputational risk.

03Field reports

Review-platform availability (Gartner Peer Insights, G2, TrustRadius)

Gartner Peer Insights: no Climes-specific listing was found in accessible results during this research.
G2 / TrustRadius / Capterra: Climes-specific product pages or reviews were not found in accessible search results; searches returned unrelated products where “carbon” appeared as a keyword. This suggests limited presence or discoverability on major review platforms.

Vendor-published testimonials and case material

Positive vendor-site testimonial (events):

Airbus India & South Asia (named on Climes events page) is quoted saying: “Shout out to Climes for helping us make this a carbon neutral event.” (vendor-published quote)

Vendor-published case material (WRI):

A Climes resource page states WRI achieved full participation from a group of district-level officials using Carbon Neutral Events, and describes a mix of emissions-reduction steps plus neutralisation of residual emissions through Climes. These outcomes are vendor-published and do not include an independently documented methodology in the public excerpts reviewed.

Press coverage signals (not reviews):

Forbes India (Sep 13, 2022) describes Climes’ checkout integrations and reports a founder-quoted figure indicating a substantial daily opt-in rate in a specific implementation referenced in the article.

Common criticisms and complaints (from accessible sources)

Community posts express difficulty finding independent reviews and question registries and project legitimacy.
Reddit discussions about offsets and removals highlight general skepticism and concerns about greenwashing across providers.

Interpretation: the absence of Climes-specific negative reviews in accessible English-speaking review communities should not be interpreted as validation; it may indicate limited adoption, regional focus, or low public discussion volume.

Why customers choose Climes (inferred from sources)

Based on Climes’ positioning and partner mentions in press coverage, likely drivers include:

A streamlined consumer experience that reduces steps for participation in neutralisation at checkout.
A combined measurement and allocation flow that covers both calculation and project funding.
Pricing framed in local currency increments that make contributions small and understandable for some consumers.

WRI event case (vendor resource page)

Claimed outcomes: a WRI workshop is described as using emissions reduction steps (for example, food choices, reduced disposables, digital promotion) and neutralising residual emissions through Climes; the page states full participation from a cohort of district-level officials.
Critical evaluation: these metrics are vendor-published; the definition of participation (for example, opt-in to neutralisation versus attendance) is not clarified, and the emissions calculation boundaries (travel, venue energy, materials) and factor sources are not disclosed in the public excerpts.

Carbon Neutral Events (vendor page)

Claimed metric: a substantial quantity of CO2e neutralised is shown on an events marketing page.
Critical evaluation: the timeframe, whether this is cumulative, and the verification or retirement proof for those credits are not documented in the public materials reviewed.

MakeMyTrip integration (press / secondary coverage)

Press coverage indicates MakeMyTrip offered a neutralisation option for flight bookings using Climes.
Critical evaluation: the existence of an integration supports product-market applicability for checkout neutralisation, but it does not validate credit quality or long-term customer satisfaction metrics.

04Best fit

Company sizes

Two plausible ICP bands based on Climes’ combined consumer and enterprise focus:

Digital brands and platforms (small to mid-market): organizations able to ship an API/checkout feature and seeking measurable consumer engagement.
Logistics and mobility operators (mid-market to large enterprise): organizations needing multi-modal emissions consolidation and customer-facing reporting.

Industries / verticals

Logistics and multimodal freight
Mobility and travel platforms
Events (corporate events, conferences)
Consumer brands seeking engagement at checkout

Roles and personas

Sustainability / ESG leads
Product managers (checkout / customer experience)
Operations / logistics analytics
Finance / compliance stakeholders (for disclosure use cases)

Qualification criteria (better fit)

Organizations seeking customer-facing climate action integrated into purchase flows.
Organizations willing to use neutralisation as a communications approach with appropriate disclaimers.
Organizations with internal capacity to manage carbon data and governance.

05The pitch

What the product does (core value proposition)

Climes is a climate-finance and carbon-intelligence solution with two related product directions:

Consumer/brand neutralisation at the point of sale: API and checkout integrations that present an emissions estimate for a transaction (e.g., travel, logistics, events) and enable the customer or the business to fund climate projects to allocate an emissions-equivalent amount. Climes defines 1 “Clime” as 1 kg CO2e and treats it as a unit customers can purchase or allocate to projects.
B2B carbon accounting and compliance-oriented carbon intelligence: product messaging and pages describe measurement across Scope 1/2/3 and alignment with standards/frameworks (for example, the GHG Protocol and logistics-specific references to GLEC) and state support for disclosure workflows intended to be compatible with audits.

Important buyer caveat: Climes uses the language of “neutralise” and “carbon credits/projects.” In the broader market, such claims are often scrutinized (additionality, permanence, leakage, double-counting, and whether offsetting meaningfully compensates for ongoing emissions). Climes’ materials present a curated project portfolio and evolving pricing to support higher-priced project types; independent verification of those quality claims is not consistently visible in public sources.

Target market and positioning

B2B (current positioning emphasis): logistics providers, mobility operators, and multimodal shipping companies needing carbon measurement and reporting plus potential customer-facing climate touchpoints.
Brands / consumer platforms: e-commerce, travel, events—embedding a neutralisation option at checkout via API integrations.
Market positioning: describes itself as a carbon-intelligence provider and a climate finance layer that connects measurement to project funding.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Climes including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →