cloudapps

Name: cloudapps
Brand: CloudApps
Rating: 4.5 (25 reviews)

Empowering leaders to maximise revenue at speed with applied AI and behavioural science

Est 2009|Valuation $15.1M|Raised $2.9M|25 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Website|Web traffic 9K|FTEs 17|HQ Wokingham, England, GB

MarketsSales Forecasting

Published Oct 14, 2026

01Common complaints

- Independent enterprise compliance evidence (SOC 2 Type II / ISO 27001) is required and the vendor cannot provide it under NDA. - Transparent, self-serve pricing and immediate procurement without a sales engagement are required. - Forecasting deficiencies stem from upstream go-to-market strategy issues (poor qualification processes, unclear ICP, or insufficient pipeline generation); a forecasting layer alone will not resolve such problems. - The organisation is not Salesforce-first or has a highly customised Salesforce implementation without resources for integration. - The primary need is conversation intelligence (recording/transcription/analysis) rather than CRM-based deal scoring; specialised competitors may be a better fit.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Non-Salesforce CRM or a highly fragmented CRM landscape
Highly immature GTM process without stable stages or definitions
Organisational resistance to gamification or leaderboard-style incentives

Vendor-acknowledged / implied

Help Centre release notes indicate ongoing fixes, which is typical, but include items such as:
- Salesforce fiscal calendar edge cases
- Formatting and payload issues in certain scenarios
- Ongoing enhancements for integration behaviour

Roadmap transparency

No public, detailed roadmap with dated milestones was found in the sources reviewed.

Scale limitations

No explicit, public scale limitations were documented.

Security/compliance gaps (publicly visible)

SOC 2 and ISO certificates are not clearly published in the public material reviewed.

02Why they buy

Unique selling points supported by vendor positioning (to be validated in evaluation)

Integration designed for Salesforce to operate within CRM records and workflows.
A combination of predictive modeling and features intended to influence behaviour and execution (e.g., guidance and gamification).

Where competitors may have advantages

Larger platforms (Clari, Gong) may offer broader brand recognition, wider third-party review coverage, more extensive cross-system ingestion, and more mature enterprise security documentation.

03Field reports

Important caveat: review-site “CloudApp” vs cloudapps.com

The majority of review-platform entries under “CloudApp” reference Zight (formerly CloudApp), a visual communication/screen recording tool, not the cloudapps.com revenue intelligence product. Review content from those listings should not be treated as direct evidence of cloudapps.com product quality.

Review platform quotes (Zight / formerly CloudApp)

Capterra includes both negative and positive experiences for the visual communication product:

Negative feedback: reviewers report crashes, upload and recording issues over extended use.
Positive feedback: reviewers praise ease of use and a user-friendly interface.

G2 review themes for the visual communication product similarly highlight ease of use and time-saving benefits, alongside complaints about link reliability and compatibility problems.

What customers praise (for Zight listing)

Common positives from review snippets and platform summaries:

Easy capture and sharing workflows
Productivity and time savings
Simple user interface

What customers complain about (for Zight listing)

Common negatives:

Bugs and crashes
Upload and recording reliability
Link and sharing issues

Evidence gap for cloudapps.com

For cloudapps.com (revenue intelligence), a clear, extensive third-party review corpus was not identified in the public review platforms during this review. This could reflect brand ambiguity, a partner-led go-to-market approach, or a smaller installed base. Prospective buyers should request reference customers and consider a pilot with measurable success criteria.

Vendor-published case study signals

Cloudapps publishes vendor-stated outcomes in customer case studies that describe material improvements in sales-efficiency metrics, issuance of numerous sales-incentive awards, and increases in average win rates. Critical evaluation: - These are vendor-published claims. The methodology (baseline definition, measurement period, and control conditions) is not detailed in the public excerpts reviewed. - Large percentage changes or specific outcome figures should be validated with the vendor and reference customers to confirm definitions and measurement windows.

Time to value (vendor claim)

The vendor describes a streamlined Salesforce integration and states that Deal Health, Pipeline Health, and Forecasting can be provisioned quickly; the vendor also suggests initial provisioning can be completed rapidly. Buyers should distinguish provisioning speed from time to measurable business impact—forecasting improvements typically require at least one full forecasting cycle to validate accuracy and establish user trust.

04Best fit

Likely best-fit company sizes

Based on the Salesforce-native packaging (small user packages) and RevOps tooling patterns, likely fit is:

Mid-market: a mid-sized team (50–500 employees), with a dedicated Salesforce administrator or RevOps function
Enterprise: Possible, but enterprise procurement will likely require additional security and compliance evidence and customer references

Industries

Likely best-fit verticals:

B2B SaaS
Telecommunications and technology (telco adjacency is suggested by vendor case material)
Any Salesforce-centric organisation with structured pipeline stages

Roles and personas

Decision makers: CRO/VP Sales, VP RevOps, Sales Ops Director
Influencers: Salesforce administrators, BI/analytics teams
End users: Frontline managers, account executives, and SDRs (particularly if Next Best Action is embedded in opportunity records)

Qualification criteria (good fit)

Salesforce is the system of record and reasonably well maintained
Leadership seeks consistent execution and is open to behaviour-focused coaching or gamification
Forecasting accuracy is an identified pain point

05The pitch

What the product does (objective value proposition)

Cloudapps (styled “cloudapps”) is a Salesforce-native revenue intelligence and sales performance platform focused on: - Predictive analytics for deal health, pipeline health, sales forecasting, and optional churn and cross-sell/upsell prediction. - Sales execution enablement through “Next Best Action” guidance, behavioural intelligence (identifying actions correlated with success), KPI boards, and gamification elements. Cloudapps is positioned as an optimization layer on top of CRM data (especially Salesforce), intended to improve forecast accuracy and sales performance by combining statistical prediction models with features aimed at reinforcing process adherence and behaviour.

Target market and positioning

- Primary buyer personas: Sales leadership (CRO/VP Sales), RevOps/Sales Ops, forecasting owners, and Salesforce administrators. - Primary use case: Improving forecast reliability, deal prioritization, and rep execution consistency within Salesforce. - Positioning theme: The vendor frames the product as combining predictive analytics and behavioural science to improve win rates, operational efficiency, and revenue; these outcomes should be validated in pilots and reference checks.

Get a comprehensive analysis of cloudapps including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →