Cloudbrink

Name: Cloudbrink
Brand: Cloudbrink
Rating: 4.7 (13 reviews)

Enjoy life and work. The new office is anywhere.

Est 2019|Valuation $57M|Raised $33.2M

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 35K|FTEs 44|HQ Sunnyvale, California, US

MarketsFirewalls Security Service Edge (SSE)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Cloudbrink may be appropriate: - Organizations where the primary operational pain is end-user quality-of-experience under poor last-mile conditions rather than only centralized security controls. - If acceleration capabilities function as described, they may reduce the performance-security tradeoffs experienced by remote users. Where competitors often excel: - Established SSE/SASE vendors generally provide broader, proven enterprise platform breadth, third-party ecosystem maturity, and more extensive public documentation and community knowledge. Pricing comparison (evidence constraints): - Major vendors commonly provide enterprise pricing by quote; publicly available pricing is limited and varies by negotiation and bundling. Procurement takeaway: run a paid pilot or controlled proof-of-concept (PoC) with identical test plans across Cloudbrink and one incumbent (e.g., Zscaler, Netskope, Prisma, Cloudflare) to assess performance and operational fit.

	Cloudbrink	Zscaler (ZPA/ZIA)	Netskope (Netskope One)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; quote-based; free personal + limited corporate trial	Public pricing pages for bundles; enterprise pricing often quote-based	Typically quote-based; public list pricing is limited or varies by region
Best For	Organizations addressing last-mile packet loss and user experience issues; teams prioritizing endpoint-based ZTNA with performance optimization	Large enterprises standardizing on SSE/SASE; mature ZTNA and broad ecosystem	Organizations focused on SaaS governance, CASB/DLP depth, and SSE capabilities
Key Strength	Performance and last-mile optimization focus; software-only delivery model	Mature platform, broad customer base, ecosystem integrations	Strong cloud app controls and data protection features
Key Weakness	Limited independently verifiable public data; fewer reviews across common review platforms; some adverse media requires diligence	Pricing and complexity can be a concern for some deployments	Pricing and operational complexity can vary based on required modules

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Cloudbrink may be appropriate:

Organizations where the primary operational pain is end-user quality-of-experience under poor last-mile conditions rather than only centralized security controls.
If acceleration capabilities function as described, they may reduce the performance-security tradeoffs experienced by remote users.

Where competitors often excel:

Established SSE/SASE vendors generally provide broader, proven enterprise platform breadth, third-party ecosystem maturity, and more extensive public documentation and community knowledge.

Pricing comparison (evidence constraints):

Major vendors commonly provide enterprise pricing by quote; publicly available pricing is limited and varies by negotiation and bundling.

Procurement takeaway: run a paid pilot or controlled proof-of-concept (PoC) with identical test plans across Cloudbrink and one incumbent (e.g., Zscaler, Netskope, Prisma, Cloudflare) to assess performance and operational fit.

	Cloudbrink	Zscaler (ZPA/ZIA)	Netskope (Netskope One)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; quote-based; free personal + limited corporate trial	Public pricing pages for bundles; enterprise pricing often quote-based	Typically quote-based; public list pricing is limited or varies by region
Best For	Organizations addressing last-mile packet loss and user experience issues; teams prioritizing endpoint-based ZTNA with performance optimization	Large enterprises standardizing on SSE/SASE; mature ZTNA and broad ecosystem	Organizations focused on SaaS governance, CASB/DLP depth, and SSE capabilities
Key Strength	Performance and last-mile optimization focus; software-only delivery model	Mature platform, broad customer base, ecosystem integrations	Strong cloud app controls and data protection features
Key Weakness	Limited independently verifiable public data; fewer reviews across common review platforms; some adverse media requires diligence	Pricing and complexity can be a concern for some deployments	Pricing and operational complexity can vary based on required modules