CloudSEK

Name: CloudSEK
Brand: CloudSEK

AI-powered Digital Risk Monitoring platform that provides real-time visibility of cyber threats and actionable Intel.

Est 2015|Valuation $44.8M|Raised $42.6M|19 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 282K|Web traffic 572K|FTEs 250|HQ Bengaluru, India

MarketsThreat Intelligence Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where CloudSEK's offering aligns with buyer needs: - Organizations seeking a single vendor that covers multiple external risk domains (brand + leaks + attack surface) and that value vendor-provided implementation support. - Organizations prioritizing early detection of exposures and integrated workflows for escalation and takedown management. Where alternatives may be stronger: - Mandiant: for enterprises prioritizing an established incident response brand, managed cyber operations, and credibility in executive conversations. - Recorded Future: for mature threat intelligence programs needing extensive correlation, enrichment, and a large integration ecosystem. - Specialist EASM vendors (CyCognito/Xpanse): for organizations requiring deep external asset discovery and continuous attack surface mapping at scale. Pricing comparison caveat: Public pricing is not broadly available across the category; CloudSEK has at least one Marketplace listing for BeVigil Enterprise, while many competitors remain fully quote-based.

	CloudSEK	Mandiant Digital Threat Monitoring	Recorded Future
Starting Price	Public pricing limited; BeVigil Enterprise listed as a five-figure annual offering on AWS Marketplace	Contact sales (licensing models vary; Google Cloud page references enterprise licensing)	Typically contact sales (enterprise TI platform; public list pricing uncommon)
Primary use case	Organizations needing an integrated DRP + EASM monitoring capability with takedown workflow options (noted strength in APAC and growing U.S. presence)	Organizations seeking Mandiant/Google-backed digital threat monitoring and managed services	Organizations needing a broad threat intelligence platform with extensive enrichment and integrations
Key Strength	Broad external risk coverage across several domains in one vendor; reviewers note integration capabilities and implementation support	Brand strength, incident response expertise, managed options, enterprise credibility	Depth and breadth of intelligence graph, integrations, and mature TI workflows
Key Weakness	Reviews frequently cite alert noise/false positives and initial complexity	Pricing can be premium; managed and incident response offerings may be required for full value	Often expensive and may require a mature TI program to realize full benefit

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where CloudSEK's offering aligns with buyer needs:

Organizations seeking a single vendor that covers multiple external risk domains (brand + leaks + attack surface) and that value vendor-provided implementation support.
Organizations prioritizing early detection of exposures and integrated workflows for escalation and takedown management.

Where alternatives may be stronger:

Mandiant: for enterprises prioritizing an established incident response brand, managed cyber operations, and credibility in executive conversations.
Recorded Future: for mature threat intelligence programs needing extensive correlation, enrichment, and a large integration ecosystem.
Specialist EASM vendors (CyCognito/Xpanse): for organizations requiring deep external asset discovery and continuous attack surface mapping at scale.

Pricing comparison caveat: Public pricing is not broadly available across the category; CloudSEK has at least one Marketplace listing for BeVigil Enterprise, while many competitors remain fully quote-based.

	CloudSEK	Mandiant Digital Threat Monitoring	Recorded Future
Starting Price	Public pricing limited; BeVigil Enterprise listed as a five-figure annual offering on AWS Marketplace	Contact sales (licensing models vary; Google Cloud page references enterprise licensing)	Typically contact sales (enterprise TI platform; public list pricing uncommon)
Primary use case	Organizations needing an integrated DRP + EASM monitoring capability with takedown workflow options (noted strength in APAC and growing U.S. presence)	Organizations seeking Mandiant/Google-backed digital threat monitoring and managed services	Organizations needing a broad threat intelligence platform with extensive enrichment and integrations
Key Strength	Broad external risk coverage across several domains in one vendor; reviewers note integration capabilities and implementation support	Brand strength, incident response expertise, managed options, enterprise credibility	Depth and breadth of intelligence graph, integrations, and mature TI workflows
Key Weakness	Reviews frequently cite alert noise/false positives and initial complexity	Pricing can be premium; managed and incident response offerings may be required for full value	Often expensive and may require a mature TI program to realize full benefit