Cluely

Name: Cluely
Brand: Cluely
Rating: 2.5 (8 reviews)

AI Native

Cluely is a real-time AI meeting assistant that listens to calls, generates live notes and summaries, extracts action items, and surfaces suggested responses during meetings.

Est 2025|Valuation $120M|Raised $20.2M

LinkedIn 43K|Web traffic 196K|FTEs 3|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsReal-Time Guided Selling AI Assistant

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Cluely | Fireflies.ai | Fathom | |--------|--------|--------------|--------| | Starting Price | Free starter tier available | Free tier available | Published team pricing (varies by tier) | | Typical Paid Entry | Published paid-tier pricing available from the vendor | Published per-seat pricing available from the vendor | Published team plan pricing available; vendor minimums vary by tier | | "Invisible / undetectable" positioning | Emphasized by the vendor and offered as a paid/concealment option | Not a core positioning (typically visible capture or bot-based) | Not a core positioning (meeting recording and summaries) | | Typical users | Individuals seeking real-time prompts during live calls and those prioritizing concealment options | Teams seeking automated recording, searchable transcripts, and integrations | Teams seeking lightweight meeting capture and post-meeting summaries, commonly used by sales and customer success teams | | Key Strength | Real-time in-call assistance and vendor emphasis on concealment capability | Established transcription workflows, searchability, and broader integration ecosystems | Simple onboarding and product-led adoption for team use | | Key Weakness | Reputational and policy risk associated with concealment emphasis; consumer review signals about refunds and reliability | Requires transparent consent workflows for recordings; compliance depends on proper configuration | Focuses on post-meeting utility rather than in-call coaching features |

Narrative analysis

- Areas of differentiation - The vendor emphasizes real-time, in-call assistance (responses during meetings) and offers a monetized option the vendor describes as concealed during screen share. - Areas where competitors have advantages - Competitors such as Fireflies.ai, tl;dv, Otter, and Fathom focus on transparent recording, searchable archives, collaboration features, and integrations that align more directly with enterprise governance and consent-based compliance. - These vendors tend to present a lower governance risk because their tools are typically positioned as visible notetakers rather than covert overlays. - Competitor perspective (example) - A competitor published critical commentary characterizing the vendor's approach as presenting ethical and procurement challenges; that commentary should be understood as the competitor's perspective and may contain marketing framing, but it highlights a potential procurement objection: features intended to conceal activity can be disqualifying for many organizations.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Cluely	Fireflies.ai	Fathom
Starting Price	Free starter tier available	Free tier available	Published team pricing (varies by tier)
Typical Paid Entry	Published paid-tier pricing available from the vendor	Published per-seat pricing available from the vendor	Published team plan pricing available; vendor minimums vary by tier
"Invisible / undetectable" positioning	Emphasized by the vendor and offered as a paid/concealment option	Not a core positioning (typically visible capture or bot-based)	Not a core positioning (meeting recording and summaries)
Typical users	Individuals seeking real-time prompts during live calls and those prioritizing concealment options	Teams seeking automated recording, searchable transcripts, and integrations	Teams seeking lightweight meeting capture and post-meeting summaries, commonly used by sales and customer success teams
Key Strength	Real-time in-call assistance and vendor emphasis on concealment capability	Established transcription workflows, searchability, and broader integration ecosystems	Simple onboarding and product-led adoption for team use
Key Weakness	Reputational and policy risk associated with concealment emphasis; consumer review signals about refunds and reliability	Requires transparent consent workflows for recordings; compliance depends on proper configuration	Focuses on post-meeting utility rather than in-call coaching features

Narrative analysis

Areas of differentiation
- The vendor emphasizes real-time, in-call assistance (responses during meetings) and offers a monetized option the vendor describes as concealed during screen share.
Areas where competitors have advantages
- Competitors such as Fireflies.ai, tl;dv, Otter, and Fathom focus on transparent recording, searchable archives, collaboration features, and integrations that align more directly with enterprise governance and consent-based compliance.
- These vendors tend to present a lower governance risk because their tools are typically positioned as visible notetakers rather than covert overlays.
Competitor perspective (example)
- A competitor published critical commentary characterizing the vendor's approach as presenting ethical and procurement challenges; that commentary should be understood as the competitor's perspective and may contain marketing framing, but it highlights a potential procurement objection: features intended to conceal activity can be disqualifying for many organizations.