CodeLogic

Name: CodeLogic
Brand: CodeLogic
Rating: 4.7 (24 reviews)

AI Native

CodeLogic maps your software architecture, automatically fixes tech debt, updates libraries, and prevents new problems.

Est 2020|Valuation $58.3M|Raised $30M

LinkedIn 1K|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 17|HQ San Francisco, California, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

- CodeLogic vs CAST: CAST provides productized application intelligence and public pricing for Imaging. CodeLogic emphasizes continuous dependency intelligence with binary and runtime scanning and developer workflow integrations. Buyers should evaluate: - coverage of their technology stack (languages/frameworks/databases) - quality and accuracy of dependency maps and change impact analysis - portfolio-scale rollout capabilities versus single-application analysis - CodeLogic vs Semgrep/Snyk-type tools: If the primary objective is security scanning (SAST/SCA/secrets), Semgrep and Snyk typically provide larger ecosystems, policy management, and security-focused reporting. If the primary pain is dependency and architecture understanding, CodeLogic, CAST, and vFunction are more directly comparable.

Market adoption signals

G2: modest review footprint.
Press: coverage in industry outlets appears to be largely product-announcement and promotional.

	CodeLogic	CAST Imaging	Semgrep (AppSec Platform)
Starting Price	Not transparently published on vendor site; third-party listings suggest enterprise pricing	Published: vendor provides published annual per-application pricing for Express and full Imaging editions	Published: vendor provides published per-contributor monthly pricing and module-based subscriptions for code/SCA and secrets scanning
Best For	Dependency mapping and change impact analysis across code and databases; modernization planning; teams seeking a centralized view of dependencies	Portfolio/application intelligence, modernization, structural flaws, cloud/containerization insights; established application mapping features	Security-focused organizations needing SAST/SCA/secrets scanning with developer workflow integration and policy enforcement
Key Strength	Graph-based visibility into dependencies and IDE/pipeline integrations; vendor materials describe continuous coverage across artefacts and runtime signals	Productized modernization intelligence, published pricing, broad technology support	Clear pricing, fast CI workflows, strong security rule ecosystem
Key Weakness	Pricing transparency and public security/compliance documentation were limited in the sources reviewed; smaller public community footprint and learning curve	Can be expensive at scale and may require analysis expertise	Not a full dependency/architecture mapping tool; focuses on security findings and triage rather than a continuously updated architecture map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

CodeLogic vs CAST: CAST provides productized application intelligence and public pricing for Imaging. CodeLogic emphasizes continuous dependency intelligence with binary and runtime scanning and developer workflow integrations. Buyers should evaluate:
- coverage of their technology stack (languages/frameworks/databases)
- quality and accuracy of dependency maps and change impact analysis
- portfolio-scale rollout capabilities versus single-application analysis
CodeLogic vs Semgrep/Snyk-type tools: If the primary objective is security scanning (SAST/SCA/secrets), Semgrep and Snyk typically provide larger ecosystems, policy management, and security-focused reporting. If the primary pain is dependency and architecture understanding, CodeLogic, CAST, and vFunction are more directly comparable.

Market adoption signals

G2: modest review footprint.
Press: coverage in industry outlets appears to be largely product-announcement and promotional.

	CodeLogic	CAST Imaging	Semgrep (AppSec Platform)
Starting Price	Not transparently published on vendor site; third-party listings suggest enterprise pricing	Published: vendor provides published annual per-application pricing for Express and full Imaging editions	Published: vendor provides published per-contributor monthly pricing and module-based subscriptions for code/SCA and secrets scanning
Best For	Dependency mapping and change impact analysis across code and databases; modernization planning; teams seeking a centralized view of dependencies	Portfolio/application intelligence, modernization, structural flaws, cloud/containerization insights; established application mapping features	Security-focused organizations needing SAST/SCA/secrets scanning with developer workflow integration and policy enforcement
Key Strength	Graph-based visibility into dependencies and IDE/pipeline integrations; vendor materials describe continuous coverage across artefacts and runtime signals	Productized modernization intelligence, published pricing, broad technology support	Clear pricing, fast CI workflows, strong security rule ecosystem
Key Weakness	Pricing transparency and public security/compliance documentation were limited in the sources reviewed; smaller public community footprint and learning curve	Can be expensive at scale and may require analysis expertise	Not a full dependency/architecture mapping tool; focuses on security findings and triage rather than a continuously updated architecture map

CodeLogic

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Market adoption signals

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Market adoption signals

02Market Map