Column
We are on a mission to improve the process of informing the public through great software.
We are on a mission to improve the process of informing the public through great software.
Published Oct 15, 2026
The vendor has published partner and deployment counts in acquisition and company reports. Media coverage has cited processing volumes and cross-state deployments. These numbers are largely vendor-reported or based on spokesperson comments and should be validated when used in procurement or market sizing.
| Starting Price | Not publicly listed (sales-led) | Not publicly listed (contact sales / varies) | Not publicly listed (varies by product) |
| Best For | Newspapers seeking notice/obit/classified workflows and optional outsourcing | Press associations and statewide notice repositories; monitoring/archiving | Publishers seeking broader publisher tech stack (CMS, e-edition, apps) |
| Key Strength | Transactional workflow for notices; affidavit workflow features; advertiser-facing ordering flow | Established press association partnerships and statewide hosting experience | Publisher platform breadth and integration with publishing workflows |
| Key Weakness | Limited public third-party review volume; limited public security and pricing transparency; precedent of sunsetting some product lines | Implementation quality varies by deployment; governance model can influence completeness | Public-notice-specific workflow depth may require additional integration work |
—
Column's differentiation centers on treating notices as an end-to-end transactional workflow that includes proofing, billing, and affidavit automation rather than functioning solely as a searchable repository. Other vendors may be more focused on statewide repository hosting or broader publisher platform features.
Where alternatives may excel: