Combo
Simplifying HR and team scheduling for SMBs and their frontline teams across Europe. Less admin, more human!
Est 2016|Valuation $122.1M|Raised $49.4M
Published Jun 25, 2026
A competitor publishes comparison material noting that Combo can reach limits as planning becomes complex and HR needs more automation. Competitor-authored material is inherently biased but can serve as a checklist for evaluating complex scheduling and automation requirements.
| Starting Price | Per-establishment, tiered pricing with progressive scaling by headcount and optional per-employee add-ons (low-hundreds per site monthly magnitude) | Low per-user monthly pricing with tiered plans and feature gates | Low per-user monthly pricing aimed at low-cost entry for small teams |
| Typical fit | EU SMBs with frontline scheduling and basic HR administration needs; multi-establishment operators using per-site packaging | SMB–midmarket needing more advanced scheduling, forecasting, and compliance tooling; broader global footprint | SMBs needing simple scheduling and team messaging with low per-user pricing |
| Primary capabilities | Scheduling + basic HRIS features; localized labor concepts for EU markets | Deeper WFM features (forecasting, labor optimization) and tiered feature sets | Low entry price and straightforward scheduling-centric experience |
| Noted limitations | Public security/compliance certifications and enterprise controls not clearly documented; some integration and reporting complaints reported by users | Can become expensive at scale; per-user pricing adds up; some advanced features restricted to higher tiers | May be less HRIS-oriented; enterprise controls (SSO) are typically available only in higher tiers |