Compleat

Name: Compleat
Brand: Compleat
Rating: 4.6 (37 reviews)

Compleat has one goal: To enable businesses to achieve the extraordinary. #TheFutureIsNow

Est 1998|Valuation $29.1M|Raised $18.8M|37 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 4K|Website|FTEs 43|HQ Doncaster, England, GB

MarketsIntake-to-Pay Source-to-Pay Procure-to-Pay Invoice Data Capture & Processing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where competitors excel)

- BILL vs Compleat: BILL publishes detailed pricing and targets SMBs with AP/AR and payments capabilities; Compleat is positioned more around P2P workflows and punchout functionality, with less public pricing transparency and a smaller review footprint. - Tipalti vs Compleat: Tipalti is often selected where global payables, diverse payout methods, and tax compliance onboarding matter. Comparative reviewer summaries indicate Compleat scores well for invoice capture and goods receipt workflows, while Tipalti is stronger on payments breadth and product direction. - Coupa vs Compleat: Coupa is enterprise-grade spend management suitable for complex sourcing and large global rollouts, typically with a higher implementation cost and longer time-to-value. - Precoro vs Compleat: Precoro’s advantage is transparent pricing and clear packaging; Compleat’s cited advantages include specific integrations and punchout workflows, but vendor transparency (pricing, security) appears more limited in the sources reviewed.

Adoption/market signals

The vendor states it serves a large customer base. G2 review volume is modest, which limits statistical confidence relative to competitors with larger review footprints.

	Compleat	Precoro	Tipalti
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Entry-level packages in the hundreds/month range (billed annually)	Entry-level pricing in the low-hundreds/month range
Best For	Small and mid-market organizations needing P2P and AP workflow automation and punchout capabilities	SMB/mid-market teams seeking transparent pricing and rapid P2P rollout	AP teams requiring AP automation with payments and compliance onboarding at a global scale
Key Strength	Focus on purchasing controls, invoice capture, and supplier site/punchout integrations; ERP/accounting integration options cited	Transparent pricing and packaging; positioning around quick deployment and ROI	Public pricing entry points; breadth of payments and tax/compliance onboarding features
Key Weakness	Public security/compliance posture not clearly documented; some reviews cite slowness and support variability; pricing opacity	May be less suited for highly complex enterprise procurement	Payments and global compliance features may be more than necessary for some buyers; total cost may grow with transaction volume and modules

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where competitors excel)

BILL vs Compleat: BILL publishes detailed pricing and targets SMBs with AP/AR and payments capabilities; Compleat is positioned more around P2P workflows and punchout functionality, with less public pricing transparency and a smaller review footprint.
Tipalti vs Compleat: Tipalti is often selected where global payables, diverse payout methods, and tax compliance onboarding matter. Comparative reviewer summaries indicate Compleat scores well for invoice capture and goods receipt workflows, while Tipalti is stronger on payments breadth and product direction.
Coupa vs Compleat: Coupa is enterprise-grade spend management suitable for complex sourcing and large global rollouts, typically with a higher implementation cost and longer time-to-value.
Precoro vs Compleat: Precoro’s advantage is transparent pricing and clear packaging; Compleat’s cited advantages include specific integrations and punchout workflows, but vendor transparency (pricing, security) appears more limited in the sources reviewed.

Adoption/market signals

The vendor states it serves a large customer base. G2 review volume is modest, which limits statistical confidence relative to competitors with larger review footprints.

	Compleat	Precoro	Tipalti
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Entry-level packages in the hundreds/month range (billed annually)	Entry-level pricing in the low-hundreds/month range
Best For	Small and mid-market organizations needing P2P and AP workflow automation and punchout capabilities	SMB/mid-market teams seeking transparent pricing and rapid P2P rollout	AP teams requiring AP automation with payments and compliance onboarding at a global scale
Key Strength	Focus on purchasing controls, invoice capture, and supplier site/punchout integrations; ERP/accounting integration options cited	Transparent pricing and packaging; positioning around quick deployment and ROI	Public pricing entry points; breadth of payments and tax/compliance onboarding features
Key Weakness	Public security/compliance posture not clearly documented; some reviews cite slowness and support variability; pricing opacity	May be less suited for highly complex enterprise procurement	Payments and global compliance features may be more than necessary for some buyers; total cost may grow with transaction volume and modules