Contingent

Name: Contingent
Brand: Contingent
Rating: 4.5 (3 reviews)

The single source of truth for supplier insights

Est 2019|Valuation $38.4M|Raised $12.4M|7 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 26|HQ London, England, GB

MarketsSupplier Intelligence Vendor Risk Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Compared with cyber-rating-first vendor risk management tools (UpGuard, SecurityScorecard, BitSight), Contingent emphasizes supplier intelligence and procurement workflows, whereas cyber-rating vendors emphasize security posture scoring and telemetry.
Compared with large TPRM/GRC suites (OneTrust, Aravo, Prevalent), those suites typically provide broader governance capabilities, policy management, and advanced workflow customization that appeal to global enterprises. Contingent may be positioned as a lighter-weight supplier intelligence and monitoring alternative that could be faster to implement, subject to validation.

- Compared with cyber-rating-first vendor risk management tools (UpGuard, SecurityScorecard, BitSight), Contingent emphasizes supplier intelligence and procurement workflows, whereas cyber-rating vendors emphasize security posture scoring and telemetry. - Compared with large TPRM/GRC suites (OneTrust, Aravo, Prevalent), those suites typically provide broader governance capabilities, policy management, and advanced workflow customization that appeal to global enterprises. Contingent may be positioned as a lighter-weight supplier intelligence and monitoring alternative that could be faster to implement, subject to validation.

Adoption and market presence signals

Public press coverage from industry outlets indicates early traction and investor interest. Market data sources classify the company at an early stage with limited public review volume relative to larger incumbents.

	Contingent (contingent.ai)	UpGuard Vendor Risk (upguard.com)	OneTrust Third-Party Risk (onetrust.com)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (demo/quote)	Entry-level starting in the low-thousands/month (billed annually)	Not publicly listed (quote-based)
Primary Focus	Supplier insight and monitoring with procurement-facing workflows	Cyber posture monitoring with vendor risk management	Broad third-party lifecycle workflows integrated with privacy and compliance modules
Key Strength	Supplier monitoring and procurement-oriented workflows	Pricing transparency at entry level; cyber posture monitoring	Platform breadth for enterprise-scale third-party governance
Key Weakness	Limited public security/compliance documentation and limited public review volume	Oriented to cyber posture; may be less procurement-centric	Potentially complex and expensive for some buyers