Corrigo

Name: Corrigo
Brand: Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL)

Corrigo is a cloud-based computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) that manages high-volume work orders, asset records, vendor coordination, and reporting/BI for multi-site facilities portfolios.

Est 1783|Valuation $14.9B|74 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2.3M|Website|Web traffic 891K|FTEs 105,934|HQ Chicago, Illinois, US

MarketsFacilities Management Industrial IoT

Platform CoversSupplier Relationship Management (SRM) and Vendor Management (VRM)

01Competitive Landscape

Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Corrigo | ServiceChannel | MaintainX | |--------|---------|----------------|-----------| | Starting Price | Not publicly listed (quote-based pricing) | Not publicly listed (quote-based pricing; sometimes structured by location) | Offers a free entry-level plan; published paid tiers with published pricing | | Typical Use Case | Multi-site facilities teams requiring centralized work orders, vendor coordination, and reporting | Multi-site brands with large contractor ecosystems and managed services needs | Teams prioritizing rapid deployment, mobile-first UX, and transparent published pricing | | Key Strength | Work order management, preventive maintenance scheduling, and vendor coordination capabilities (per vendor claims and reviewer feedback) | Contractor ecosystem and managed services positioning; spend visibility options | Transparent published pricing, modern onboarding, mobile collaboration | | Key Weakness | Reviewer feedback indicates UI/workflow friction, customization limits, and occasional performance issues | Pricing opacity and potential complexity for some enterprise buyers | May not address complex enterprise approval chains without additional capabilities |

Direct competitors and their key differentiators

- ServiceChannel - Focuses on a platform to manage and pay for repair and maintenance services across enterprises; positions itself around contractor management and managed services. - MaintainX - Publishes transparent pricing and emphasizes simple onboarding and mobile-first collaboration. - ARCHIBUS (Eptura) - Positioned as a broader IWMS/EAM solution beyond a pure CMMS; typically enterprise/contract-based pricing and deployment.

Feature comparison: where Corrigo excels vs lags behind (based on reviews and vendor positioning)

- Areas of relative strength (per reviewer feedback and vendor positioning): - Work order tracking and dispatch - Preventive maintenance scheduling and reporting - Vendor coordination for multi-site portfolios - Areas of concern or relative weakness (per reviewer feedback): - User interface modernity and workflow click burden - Flexibility for customization (reports/workflows) - Reported performance issues at scale in some deployments - Some mobile workflow gaps (for example, certain approval flows)

Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives

- Corrigo vs MaintainX - Corrigo’s quote-based pricing is consistent with enterprise procurement models but reduces early-stage budget transparency. MaintainX’s published pricing is more accessible to SMB and mid-market buyers and can serve as an anchor in negotiations. - Corrigo vs ServiceChannel - Both vendors commonly use quote-based pricing; selection decisions often hinge on contractor ecosystem fit, incumbent presence in the customer base, and which operational workflow model aligns with buyer needs.

Customer testimonials comparing this product to competitors

Comparison content on review platforms indicates Corrigo was chosen in some cases for PM scheduling, reporting, and portal/integration capabilities; other buyers selected competitors for mobile simplicity or contractor network coverage.

Market share and adoption trends

Public, independently audited market share data were not found in accessible sources for this report.
Review-platform visibility: Corrigo has a substantive presence on mainstream review platforms, which suggests a meaningful installed base among those platforms’ user communities.

When customers choose competitors instead (and why)

ServiceChannel is often selected when contractor management, provider ecosystem coverage, and managed services are primary selection criteria.
MaintainX / Limble / UpKeep are often selected when rapid time-to-value, simpler UX, and transparent published pricing are priorities.
IBM Maximo or equivalent EAM platforms are selected for deep enterprise asset management requirements in industrial contexts.