CreAim DS

Name: CreAim DS
Brand: CreAim DS

Sterker in digitale verantwoording met een persoonlijke aanpak

Est 2000|8 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 311|Website|FTEs 9|HQ Zaandam, North Holland, NL

MarketseSignature Statutory & Regulatory Reporting

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | CreAim DS | Silverfin | PinkWeb | |--------|-----------|----------|---------| | Starting Price | Published module example: published per-module/year pricing available from the vendor for a BTW module + KvK depositing; full-suite pricing unclear | Not publicly priced in sources reviewed (typically sales-led) | Pricing not surfaced in the sources reviewed; SLA/terms documents exist | | Most suitable for | Dutch accounting firms needing client portal, approvals, SBR/XBRL filing, and PKI signing | Firms seeking broader post-accounting automation, structured data, and reporting | Firms in the Dutch accountancy ecosystem seeking connectivity and portal services | | Key strength | Focus on Dutch compliance workflows (SBR/Digipoort/KvK deposit) and integrated signing and portal features | Broader automation layer, integrations, analytics and reporting capabilities | Presence in Dutch accountancy software landscape and related connectivity offerings | | Key weakness | Public review footprint on major B2B platforms is limited; consumer reviews show support-related signals; full-suite pricing transparency is limited | May involve higher cost/complexity for full-feature deployments | Public information is more limited; requires vendor diligence | Narrative analysis - Direct competitors and their key differentiators - Silverfin emphasizes a structured data hub, compliance automation templates, analytics/reporting, and integrations. - CreAim DS focuses on Dutch SBR/XBRL workflows, portal-based collaboration, and signing workflows. - Feature comparison: where does CreAim DS excel vs lag behind? - Likely excels: - Approvals and document flows tailored to Dutch compliance interactions (tax, KvK, banks) - Embedded PKI-based signing workflows where required by local processes - Likely lags: - Publicly visible independent reviews and analyst coverage compared with larger international platforms - Broader data automation and analytics narratives where some competitors position strongly - Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives - CreAim publishes module pricing for at least some functions; many competitors are sales-led. Buyers should perform an apples-to-apples TCO analysis considering office users, client users, message volumes, and add-ons (signing, depositing, mobile app). - Customer testimonials comparing this product to competitors - No independent third-party comparative testimonials were found. Consumer reviews include at least one comment claiming another provider handled an identity service faster. - Market share and adoption trends - Adoption claims are vendor-published and were not independently verified in the sources reviewed. - When customers choose competitors instead (and why) - Customers may choose competitors when they require broader automation, advisory analytics, or when they prioritize particular procurement criteria such as vendor footprint on independent review platforms.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	CreAim DS	Silverfin	PinkWeb
Starting Price	Published module example: published per-module/year pricing available from the vendor for a BTW module + KvK depositing; full-suite pricing unclear	Not publicly priced in sources reviewed (typically sales-led)	Pricing not surfaced in the sources reviewed; SLA/terms documents exist
Most suitable for	Dutch accounting firms needing client portal, approvals, SBR/XBRL filing, and PKI signing	Firms seeking broader post-accounting automation, structured data, and reporting	Firms in the Dutch accountancy ecosystem seeking connectivity and portal services
Key strength	Focus on Dutch compliance workflows (SBR/Digipoort/KvK deposit) and integrated signing and portal features	Broader automation layer, integrations, analytics and reporting capabilities	Presence in Dutch accountancy software landscape and related connectivity offerings
Key weakness	Public review footprint on major B2B platforms is limited; consumer reviews show support-related signals; full-suite pricing transparency is limited	May involve higher cost/complexity for full-feature deployments	Public information is more limited; requires vendor diligence

Narrative analysis

Direct competitors and their key differentiators
- Silverfin emphasizes a structured data hub, compliance automation templates, analytics/reporting, and integrations.
- CreAim DS focuses on Dutch SBR/XBRL workflows, portal-based collaboration, and signing workflows.
Feature comparison: where does CreAim DS excel vs lag behind?
- Likely excels:
  - Approvals and document flows tailored to Dutch compliance interactions (tax, KvK, banks)
  - Embedded PKI-based signing workflows where required by local processes
- Likely lags:
  - Publicly visible independent reviews and analyst coverage compared with larger international platforms
  - Broader data automation and analytics narratives where some competitors position strongly
Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives
- CreAim publishes module pricing for at least some functions; many competitors are sales-led. Buyers should perform an apples-to-apples TCO analysis considering office users, client users, message volumes, and add-ons (signing, depositing, mobile app).
Customer testimonials comparing this product to competitors
- No independent third-party comparative testimonials were found. Consumer reviews include at least one comment claiming another provider handled an identity service faster.
Market share and adoption trends
- Adoption claims are vendor-published and were not independently verified in the sources reviewed.
When customers choose competitors instead (and why)
- Customers may choose competitors when they require broader automation, advisory analytics, or when they prioritize particular procurement criteria such as vendor footprint on independent review platforms.

Aspect

CreAim DS

Silverfin

PinkWeb

Starting Price

Published module example: published per-module/year pricing available from the vendor for a BTW module + KvK depositing; full-suite pricing unclear

Not publicly priced in sources reviewed (typically sales-led)

Pricing not surfaced in the sources reviewed; SLA/terms documents exist

Most suitable for

Dutch accounting firms needing client portal, approvals, SBR/XBRL filing, and PKI signing

Firms seeking broader post-accounting automation, structured data, and reporting

Firms in the Dutch accountancy ecosystem seeking connectivity and portal services

Key strength

Focus on Dutch compliance workflows (SBR/Digipoort/KvK deposit) and integrated signing and portal features

Broader automation layer, integrations, analytics and reporting capabilities

Presence in Dutch accountancy software landscape and related connectivity offerings

Key weakness

Public review footprint on major B2B platforms is limited; consumer reviews show support-related signals; full-suite pricing transparency is limited

May involve higher cost/complexity for full-feature deployments

Public information is more limited; requires vendor diligence