CrescentOne

Name: CrescentOne
Brand: CrescentOne

Glovia G2 is one of the world's most experienced and solidly backed enterprise software firms.

Est 1970|26 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 1K|Website|FTEs 53|HQ El Segundo, California, US

MarketsProduction Planning ERP

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | CrescentOne (GLOVIA G2 / CrescentOne C1) | Epicor Kinetic | Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine/CSI) | |--------|---------------|----------------|----------------| | Starting Price | Not publicly listed (quote-based) | Quote-based; third-party estimates suggest published per-user pricing plus platform fees (varies widely) | Quote-based subscription; pricing varies by edition/tenant/partner | | Best For | Discrete manufacturers seeking a manufacturing-first ERP and flexibility/customization; existing GLOVIA installed base | Mid-market discrete manufacturers seeking a mainstream manufacturing ERP ecosystem and modern cloud UX | Discrete manufacturers seeking cloud deployment options and platform tooling (Infor OS/ION ecosystem) | | Key Strength | Manufacturing heritage and extensive module catalog; flexibility emphasized; long-lived deployments | Large ecosystem, broad market adoption, numerous implementation partners | Cloud/industry platform story and deployment flexibility; strong for certain manufacturing patterns | | Key Weakness | Sparse independent reviews; unclear public security/compliance disclosures; upgrades/migrations can be difficult with heavy customization | Implementation cost/complexity can be high; cloud transition concerns exist in some user communities | Perception of complexity around cloud/ION; some legacy customers prefer on-prem deployments | - Narrative analysis - Areas of relative strength for CrescentOne - Manufacturing-first orientation and extended module breadth. - Flexibility and customization capabilities, which reviewers acknowledge, though customization can increase downstream migration costs. - A continuity path for organizations with Fujitsu Glovia/GLOVIA lineage. - Areas where competitors often excel - Epicor Kinetic - Broader mainstream mindshare and a larger online peer community; more third-party implementation partners. - Vendor-published ROI claims exist (based on commissioned studies), though such materials are marketing content and require validation. - Infor CloudSuite Industrial - Strong cloud suite and platform narrative and deployment flexibility. - Larger review footprints in many categories than CrescentOne. - Customer testimonials comparing CrescentOne to competitors - Available public comparison snippets summarize relative review counts and ratings; CrescentOne shows fewer public reviews and lower willingness-to-recommend in some comparison views.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	CrescentOne (GLOVIA G2 / CrescentOne C1)	Epicor Kinetic	Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine/CSI)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Quote-based; third-party estimates suggest published per-user pricing plus platform fees (varies widely)	Quote-based subscription; pricing varies by edition/tenant/partner
Best For	Discrete manufacturers seeking a manufacturing-first ERP and flexibility/customization; existing GLOVIA installed base	Mid-market discrete manufacturers seeking a mainstream manufacturing ERP ecosystem and modern cloud UX	Discrete manufacturers seeking cloud deployment options and platform tooling (Infor OS/ION ecosystem)
Key Strength	Manufacturing heritage and extensive module catalog; flexibility emphasized; long-lived deployments	Large ecosystem, broad market adoption, numerous implementation partners	Cloud/industry platform story and deployment flexibility; strong for certain manufacturing patterns
Key Weakness	Sparse independent reviews; unclear public security/compliance disclosures; upgrades/migrations can be difficult with heavy customization	Implementation cost/complexity can be high; cloud transition concerns exist in some user communities	Perception of complexity around cloud/ION; some legacy customers prefer on-prem deployments

Narrative analysis
- Areas of relative strength for CrescentOne
  - Manufacturing-first orientation and extended module breadth.
  - Flexibility and customization capabilities, which reviewers acknowledge, though customization can increase downstream migration costs.
  - A continuity path for organizations with Fujitsu Glovia/GLOVIA lineage.
- Areas where competitors often excel
  - Epicor Kinetic
    - Broader mainstream mindshare and a larger online peer community; more third-party implementation partners.
    - Vendor-published ROI claims exist (based on commissioned studies), though such materials are marketing content and require validation.
  - Infor CloudSuite Industrial
    - Strong cloud suite and platform narrative and deployment flexibility.
    - Larger review footprints in many categories than CrescentOne.
- Customer testimonials comparing CrescentOne to competitors
  - Available public comparison snippets summarize relative review counts and ratings; CrescentOne shows fewer public reviews and lower willingness-to-recommend in some comparison views.

Aspect

CrescentOne (GLOVIA G2 / CrescentOne C1)

Epicor Kinetic

Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine/CSI)

Starting Price

Not publicly listed (quote-based)

Quote-based; third-party estimates suggest published per-user pricing plus platform fees (varies widely)

Quote-based subscription; pricing varies by edition/tenant/partner

Best For

Discrete manufacturers seeking a manufacturing-first ERP and flexibility/customization; existing GLOVIA installed base

Mid-market discrete manufacturers seeking a mainstream manufacturing ERP ecosystem and modern cloud UX

Discrete manufacturers seeking cloud deployment options and platform tooling (Infor OS/ION ecosystem)

Key Strength

Manufacturing heritage and extensive module catalog; flexibility emphasized; long-lived deployments

Large ecosystem, broad market adoption, numerous implementation partners

Cloud/industry platform story and deployment flexibility; strong for certain manufacturing patterns

Key Weakness

Sparse independent reviews; unclear public security/compliance disclosures; upgrades/migrations can be difficult with heavy customization

Implementation cost/complexity can be high; cloud transition concerns exist in some user communities

Perception of complexity around cloud/ION; some legacy customers prefer on-prem deployments